How do spine instrumentation parameters influence the 3D correction of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A patient-specific biomechanical study

被引:7
|
作者
La Barbera, Luigi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Larson, A. Noelle [4 ]
Aubin, Carl-Eric [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Polytech Montreal, Dept Mech Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] St Justine Univ Hosp Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Politecn Milan, Dept Chem Mat & Chem Engn, Milan, Italy
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Orthoped Surg, Rochester, MN USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Deformity correction; Screw pattern; Implant density; Rod contour; Spine biomechanics; Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS); CORRECTION OBJECTIVES; IMPLANT DISTRIBUTION; SURGICAL-CORRECTION; ROD SHAPE; LENKE; STIFFNESS; DENSITY; FUSION; SCREWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105346
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background: Patient-specific models promises to support the surgical decision-making process, particularly in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The present computational biomechanical study investigates how specific instrumentation parameters impact 3D deformity correction in thoracic scoliosis. Methods: 1080 instrumentation simulations of a representative patient were run. The independent instrumentation parameters were: screw pattern, upper and lower instrumented vertebrae, rod curvature and rod stiffness. ANOVA and correlation analyses analyzed how the instrumentation parameters influenced the 3D correction. Findings: Coronal plane correction was affected by the lower instrumented vertebra and rod stiffness (explaining 84% and 11%, respectively, of its overall variance). The sagittal profile was controlled by rod curvature and the upper vertebra (56% and 36%). The transverse plane vertebral rotation was influenced by lower, upper instrumented vertebra and screw pattern (35%, 32% and 19%). The Cobb angle correction was strongly correlated with the number of fused vertebrae, particularly when grouped by the upper instrumented vertebra (r = -0.91) and rod stiffness (r = -0.73). Thoracic kyphosis was strongly correlated with the number of fused vertebrae grouped by rod curvature (r = 0.84). Apical vertebral rotation was moderately correlated with the number of fused vertebrae grouped by upper/lower instrumented vertebra (r = 0.55/0.58), although variations were minimal. Interpretation: Instrumenting the last vertebra touching the central sacral vertical line improves 3D correction. A trade-off between a more cranial vs. caudal upper instrumented vertebra, respectively beneficial for coronal/sagittal vs. transverse plane correction, is required. High rod stiffness, differential rod contouring, and screw pattern were effective for coronal correction, thoracic kyphosis, and axial vertebral derotation, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How do spine instrumentation parameters influence the 3D correction of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A patient-specific biomechanical study
    La Barbera, Luigi
    Larson, A. Noelle
    Aubin, Carl-Eric
    Clinical Biomechanics, 2021, 84
  • [2] In silico patient-specific optimization of correction strategies for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    La Barbera, Luigi
    Larson, A. Noelle
    Rawlinson, Jeremy
    Aubin, Carl-Eric
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2021, 81
  • [3] The Patient-Specific Brace Design and Biomechanical Analysis of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
    Nie, Wen-Zhong
    Ye, Ming
    Liu, Zu-De
    Wang, Cheng-Tao
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2009, 131 (04):
  • [4] Patient-specific rods for thoracic kyphosis correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: Preliminary results
    Solla, Federico
    Clement, Jean-Luc
    Cunin, Vincent
    Bertoncelli, Carlo M.
    Fiere, Vincent
    Rampal, Virginie
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2020, 106 (01) : 159 - 165
  • [5] Biomechanical analysis of rod contouring in posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion for 3D correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Marine Gay
    Xiaoyu Wang
    Todd Ritzman
    Lorena Floccari
    Richard M. Schwend
    Carl-Eric Aubin
    Spine Deformity, 2023, 11 : 1309 - 1316
  • [6] Biomechanical analysis of rod contouring in posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion for 3D correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Gay, Marine
    Wang, Xiaoyu
    Ritzman, Todd
    Floccari, Lorena
    Schwend, Richard M.
    Aubin, Carl-Eric
    SPINE DEFORMITY, 2023, 11 (06) : 1309 - 1316
  • [7] Patient-Specific Surgical Correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review
    Solla, Federico
    Ilharreborde, Brice
    Clement, Jean-Luc
    Rose, Emma O.
    Monticone, Marco
    Bertoncelli, Carlo M.
    Rampal, Virginie
    CHILDREN-BASEL, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [8] Anterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: Historic prospective study
    Franic, M
    Kovac, V
    CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 47 (02) : 239 - 245
  • [9] 3D rod shape changes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis instrumentation: how much does it impact correction?
    Franck Le Navéaux
    Carl-Eric Aubin
    Stefan Parent
    Peter O. Newton
    Hubert Labelle
    European Spine Journal, 2017, 26 : 1676 - 1683
  • [10] 3D rod shape changes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis instrumentation: how much does it impact correction?
    Le Naveaux, Franck
    Aubin, Carl-Eric
    Parent, Stefan
    Newton, Peter O.
    Labelle, Hubert
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 26 (06) : 1676 - 1683