Low powered blockchain consensus protocols based on consistent hash

被引:8
|
作者
Yu, Lei [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Xiao-fang [2 ]
Jin, Yan [2 ]
Cai, Heng-yi [1 ,2 ]
Wei, Bo [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Bin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Comp Technol, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Blockchain; Consensus protocol; Consistent hash; Low energy consumption; Decentralization; TP301;
D O I
10.1631/FITEE.1800119
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Current blockchain consensus protocols have a triangle of contradictions in aspects of decentralization, security, and energy consumption, and cannot be synchronously optimized. We describe a design of two new blockchain consensus protocols, called "CHB-consensus" and "CHBD-consensus," based on a consistent hash algorithm. Honest miners can fairly gain the opportunity to create blocks. They do not consume any extra computational power resources when creating new blocks, and such blocks can obtain the whole blockchain network to confirm consensus with fairness. However, malicious miners have to pay massive computational power resources for attacking the new block creation privilege or double-spending. Blockchain networks formed by CHB-consensus and CHBD-consensus are based on the same security assumption as that in Bitcoin systems, so they save a huge amount of power without sacrificing decentralization or security. We analyze possible attacks and give a rigorous but adjustable validation strategy. CHB-consensus and CHBD-consensus introduce a certification authority (CA) system, which does not have special management or control rights over blockchain networks or data structures, but carries the risk of privacy breaches depending on credibility and reliability of the CA system. Here, we analyze the robustness and energy consumption of CHB-consensus and CHBD-consensus, and demonstrate their advantages through theoretical derivation.
引用
收藏
页码:1361 / 1377
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Low powered blockchain consensus protocols based on consistent hash
    Lei Yu
    Xiao-fang Zhao
    Yan Jin
    Heng-yi Cai
    Bo Wei
    Bin Hu
    Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 2019, 20 : 1361 - 1377
  • [2] Review on Consensus Protocols for Blockchain
    Verma, Neetu
    Jain, Saurabh
    Doriya, Rajesh
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, COMMUNICATION, AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (ICCCIS), 2021, : 281 - 286
  • [3] A Survey of Blockchain Consensus Protocols
    Xu, Jie
    Wang, Cong
    Jia, Xiaohua
    ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2023, 55 (13S)
  • [4] Bottlenecks in Blockchain Consensus Protocols
    Alqahtani, Salem
    Demirbas, Murat
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OMNI-LAYER INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (IEEE COINS 2021), 2021, : 117 - 124
  • [5] Blockchain Consensus Mechanism Based on Improved Distributed Consistency and Hash Entropy
    Ma, Jue
    SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMMING, 2021, 2021
  • [6] ASIC-Resistance of Multi-Hash Proof-of-Work Mechanisms for Blockchain Consensus Protocols
    Cho, Hyungmin
    IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 : 66210 - 66222
  • [7] Analysis of the main consensus protocols of blockchain
    Zhang, Shijie
    Lee, Jong-Hyouk
    ICT EXPRESS, 2020, 6 (02): : 93 - 97
  • [8] Blockchain Consensus: An Overview of Alternative Protocols
    Oyinloye, Damilare Peter
    Teh, Je Sen
    Jamil, Norziana
    Alawida, Moatsum
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2021, 13 (08):
  • [9] Survey of Consensus Protocols on Blockchain Applications
    Sankar, Lakshmi Siva
    Sindhu, M.
    Sethumadhavan, M.
    2017 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (ICACCS), 2017,
  • [10] Guest editorial: Blockchain consensus protocols
    Hyland-Wood, David
    Johnson, Sandra
    COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2022, 207