Comparative environmental evaluation of aggregate production from recycled waste materials and virgin sources by LCA

被引:365
|
作者
Hossain, Md. Uzzal [1 ]
Poon, Chi Sun [1 ]
Lo, Irene M. C. [2 ]
Cheng, Jack C. P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Aggregates production; Construction and demolition waste; Environmental impacts; Lifecycle assessment; Waste glass; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; DEMOLITION WASTE; FEASIBLE USE; FLY-ASH; CONCRETE; CONSTRUCTION; BLOCKS; CEMENT; GLASS; MANUFACTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.02.009
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The management of construction and demolition (C&D) waste and waste glass is a serious concern in Hong Kong, as well as other countries due to their non-combustible and non-putrescible nature, and the running out of disposal outlets. However, mineral wastes derived from C&D activities and waste glass are considered to have potential to be re-used as construction materials, especially as aggregates. In addition, Hong Kong urgently needs alternative and sustainable sources of aggregate, as the local quarry sites for aggregate production are expected to be exhausted soon. Many experimental studies have demonstrated that recycled aggregates from C&D waste and waste glass can be potentially recycled for various engineering applications in Hong Kong, but no study has yet attempted to assess the sustainability by life cycle assessment (LCA) techniques. In order to increase the environmental awareness in the construction industry, assessment of the environmental performance of construction materials by LCA is therefore needed. The present study was conducted to assess and compare the environmental consequences of recycled aggregates production from C&D waste and waste glass, and natural aggregate production from virgin materials by LCA by using case specific and first hand data. The results reveal that compared with natural coarse aggregates, recycled coarse aggregates produced from C&D waste reduce 65% greenhouse gases (GHGs) emission with a saving of 58% non-renewableenergy consumption. Similar environmental benefits are observed for producing recycled fine aggregates from C&D waste. In addition, compared with the production of natural fine aggregates from river sand, producing recycled fine aggregates from waste glass saves 54% energy consumption and reduces 61% GHGs, and 46% SO2 eq emissions. According to the IMPACT 2002+ Method, significant health, resource, climate change and ecosystem damages can be saved in producing recycled aggregates from both waste materials compared to producing and importing aggregates from virgin sources. This is the first ever LCA study on producing recycled aggregates from waste glass. Therefore, it can be concluded that substantial net environmental benefits can be realized for producing recycled aggregates from C&D waste and waste glass. The results can provide a guidance to maximize C&D waste and waste glass recycling, resourceful treatment of wastes and conserve natural resources. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 77
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] LCA applied to comparative environmental evaluation of aggregate production from recycled waste materials and virgin sources
    Linares R.
    López-Uceda A.
    Piccinali A.
    Martínez-Ruedas C.
    Galvín A.P.
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (31) : 44023 - 44035
  • [2] Comparative Environmental Impacts of Recycled Concrete Aggregate and Manufactured Sand Production
    Gyanendra Kumar Attri
    Ramesh Chandra Gupta
    Sandeep Shrivastava
    Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 2022, 6 : 737 - 749
  • [3] Comparative Environmental Impacts of Recycled Concrete Aggregate and Manufactured Sand Production
    Attri, Gyanendra Kumar
    Gupta, Ramesh Chandra
    Shrivastava, Sandeep
    PROCESS INTEGRATION AND OPTIMIZATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 6 (03) : 737 - 749
  • [4] Could the recycled yarns substitute for the virgin cotton yarns: a comparative LCA
    Yun Liu
    Haihong Huang
    Libin Zhu
    Cheng Zhang
    Feiyue Ren
    Zhifeng Liu
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2020, 25 : 2050 - 2062
  • [5] Could the recycled yarns substitute for the virgin cotton yarns: a comparative LCA
    Liu, Yun
    Huang, Haihong
    Zhu, Libin
    Zhang, Cheng
    Ren, Feiyue
    Liu, Zhifeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (10): : 2050 - 2062
  • [6] Production of lightweight aggregate from waste materials
    Weinecke, MH
    Faulkner, BP
    MINING ENGINEERING, 2002, 54 (11) : 39 - 43
  • [7] Economic and Environmental Evaluation and Optimal Ratio of Natural and Recycled Aggregate Production
    Ghanbari, Milad
    Abbasi, Armin Monir
    Ravanshadnia, Mehdi
    ADVANCES IN MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2017, 2017
  • [8] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Cellulose Nanofibres Production Routes from Virgin and Recycled Raw Materials
    Gallo Stampino, Paola
    Riva, Laura
    Punta, Carlo
    Elegir, Graziano
    Bussini, Daniele
    Dotelli, Giovanni
    MOLECULES, 2021, 26 (09):
  • [9] LCA of virgin and recycled materials to assess the sustainability of paved surfaces in agricultural environment
    Santolini, Enrica
    Bovo, Marco
    Barbaresi, Alberto
    Torreggiani, Daniele
    Tassinari, Patrizia
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 393
  • [10] Combination of LCA and circularity index for assessment of environmental impact of recycled aggregate concrete
    Kadawo, Abdinasir
    Sadagopan, Madumita
    During, Otto
    Bolton, Kim
    Nagy, Agnes
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE CEMENT-BASED MATERIALS, 2021, : 1 - 12