Beef feedlot cattle prefer more forage in their ration when given a choice.

被引：0
|
作者：
Zobel, G.
Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. S.
Veria, D.
Genswein, B. M. A.
Gibb, T.
Zobel, A. M.
Gibb, D.
Von Keyserlingk, M. A. G.
机构：
[1] Univ British Columbia, Welfare Program, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[2] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
[3] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Agassiz, BC, Canada
[4] Trent Univ, Inst Spect, Peterborough, ON K9J 7B8, Canada
来源：
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE | 2006年 / 86卷 / 04期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号：
0905 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：596 / 597
页数：2
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Inclusion of zeolites(clinoptilolite) in finishing ration of feedlot beef cattle.
    Jones, N. M.
    Engle, T. E.
    Han, H.
    Wagner, J. J.
    Archibeque, S. L.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2017, 95 : 267 - 267
  • [2] Substitution of corn grain with white oat grain in non-forage diets for feedlot beef cattle
    Pereira, Lucas Braido
    Machado, Diego Soares
    Alves Filho, Dari Celestino
    Brondani, Ivan Luiz
    Adams, Sander Martinho
    da Silva, Mauren Burin
    Cocco, Joziane Michelon
    Maidana, Fabiana Moro
    Klein, John Lenon
    Volpatto, Rodrigo Soares
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 53
  • [3] When Do Consumers Prefer More Choice? Moderating Effects of Regulatory Focus
    Bodur, H. Onur
    Matyas, Lissa
    ADVANCES IN CONSUMER RESEARCH, VOL 35, 2008, 35 : 787 - 788
  • [4] Choice matters: participants are more likely to adhere to screening when given a choice of approaches
    不详
    COLORECTAL CANCER, 2012, 1 (03) : 198 - 198
  • [5] Dry and wet conditions during the prepartum forage growing season affect offspring feedlot performance and carcass composition in beef cattle
    Meyer, A. M.
    Vander Ley, B. L.
    Gatson, G. A.
    Busby, W. D.
    Gunn, P. J.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 : 130 - 130
  • [6] Do consumers prefer pasture-raised dual-purpose cattle when considering meat products? A hypothetical discrete choice experiment for the case of minced beef
    Schulze, Maureen
    Spiller, Achim
    Risius, Antje
    MEAT SCIENCE, 2021, 177
  • [7] Effects of Non Forage Fiber Sources in Total Mixed Ration on Feed Intake, Nutrient Digestibility, Chewing Behavior and Ruminal Fermentation in Beef Cattle
    Chumpawadee, S.
    Pimpa, O.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND VETERINARY ADVANCES, 2009, 8 (10): : 2038 - 2044
  • [8] Comparison of fatty acid and sensory profiles of beef from forage-fed cattle with retail united states department of agriculture choice and select beef
    Baublits, R. T.
    Pohlman, F. W.
    Brown, A. H., Jr.
    Rule, D. C.
    Johnson, Z. B.
    Onks, D. O.
    Murrieta, C. M.
    Sandelin, B. A.
    Richards, C. J.
    Loveday, H. D.
    Pugh, R. B.
    JOURNAL OF MUSCLE FOODS, 2006, 17 (03) : 311 - 329
  • [9] POST-HARVEST PINEAPPLE PLANT FORAGE AS A POTENTIAL FEEDSTUFF FOR BEEF-CATTLE - EVALUATED BY LABORATORY ANALYSES, INVITRO AND INVIVO DIGESTIBILITY AND FEEDLOT TRIALS
    KELLEMS, RO
    WAYMAN, O
    NGUYEN, AH
    NOLAN, JC
    CAMPBELL, CM
    CARPENTER, JR
    HOA, EB
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1979, 48 (05) : 1040 - 1048
  • [10] Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and performance by beef feedlot cattle given Lactobacillus direct-fed microbials
    Brashears, MM
    Galyean, ML
    Loneragan, GH
    Mann, JE
    Killinger-Mann, K
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2003, 66 (05) : 748 - 754
12