Pain assessment by pupil dilation reflex in response to noxious stimulation in anaesthetized adults

被引:42
|
作者
Wildemeersch, D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Peeters, N. [1 ]
Saldien, V. [1 ]
Vercauteren, M. [2 ,3 ]
Hans, G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Antwerp Univ Hosp UZA, Dept Anaesthesia, Edegem, Belgium
[2] Antwerp Univ Hosp UZA, Multidisciplinary Pain Ctr, Edegem, Belgium
[3] Univ Antwerp, Lab Pain Res, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
analgesia; assessment; monitoring; reflex; IMMEDIATE POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; LIGHT REFLEX; INFRARED PUPILLOMETRY; CONTROLLED INFUSION; ANESTHESIA; REMIFENTANIL; PROPOFOL; ANALGESIA; PREDICTION; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1111/aas.13129
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn response to noxious stimulation, pupillary dilation reflex (PDR) occurs even in anaesthetized patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the ability of pupillometry with an automated increasing stimulus intensity to monitor intraoperative opioid administration. MethodsThirty-four patients undergoing elective surgery were enrolled. Induction by propofol anaesthesia was increased progressively until the sedation depth criteria (SeD) were attained. Subsequently, a first dynamic pupil measurement was performed by applying standardized nociceptive stimulation (SNS). A second PDR evaluation was performed when remifentanil reached a target effect-site concentration. Automated infrared pupillometry was used to determine PDR during nociceptive stimulations generating a unique pupillary pain index (PPI). Vital signs were measured. ResultsAfter opioid administration, anaesthetized patients required a higher stimulation intensity (57.43mA vs 32.29mA, P<.0005). Pupil variation in response to the nociceptive stimulations was significantly reduced after opioid administration (8mm vs 28mm, P<.0005). The PPI score decreased after analgesic treatment (8 vs 2, P<.0005), corresponding to a 30% decrease. The elicitation of PDR by nociceptive stimulation was performed without changes in vital signs before (HR 76 vs 74/min, P=.09; SBP 123 vs 113mmHg, P=.001) and after opioid administration (HR 63 vs 62/min, P=.4; SBP 98.66 vs 93.77mmHg, P=.032). ConclusionsDuring propofol anaesthesia, pupillometry with the possibility of low-intensity standardized noxious stimulation via PPI protocol can be used for PDR assessment in response to remifentanil administration.
引用
收藏
页码:1050 / 1056
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Phasic pupil dilation response to noxious stimulation in humans
    Chapman, CR
    Oka, S
    Jacobson, RC
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH WORLD CONGRESS ON PAIN, 1997, 8 : 449 - 458
  • [2] Propofol reduces the pupil dilation response to noxious stimulation in humans
    Oka, Shunichi
    Nakanishi, Honami
    Oi, Yoshiyuki
    Suzuki, Naoto
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 108 : 375 - 375
  • [3] Pupil dilation response to noxious stimulation: Effect of varying nitrous oxide concentration
    Oka, Shunichi
    Chapman, C. Richard
    Kim, Barkhwa
    Nakajima, Ichiro
    Shimizu, Osamu
    Oi, Yoshlyuki
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 118 (09) : 2016 - 2024
  • [4] Phasic pupil dilation response to noxious stimulation in normal volunteers: Relationship to brain evoked potentials and pain report
    Chapman, CR
    Oka, S
    Bradshaw, DH
    Jacobson, RC
    Donaldson, GW
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 36 (01) : 44 - 52
  • [5] Alfentanil blocks reflex pupillary dilation in response to noxious stimulation but does not diminish the light reflex
    Larson, MD
    Kurz, A
    Sessler, DI
    Dechert, M
    Bjorksten, AR
    Tayefeh, F
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (04) : 849 - 855
  • [6] Pupil response to noxious corneal stimulation
    Alabi, Emmanuel B.
    Simpson, Trefford L.
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (01):
  • [7] Interest of pupillary reflex dilation and noxious stimulation response index in predicting reaction to incision
    Bouroche, G.
    Bentivegna, E.
    Billard, V.
    ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 2013, 32 : A22 - A23
  • [8] Phasic pupil dilation response to noxious stimulation: Effects of conduction distance. sex, and age
    Oka, S
    Chapman, CR
    Jacobson, RC
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 14 (02) : 97 - 105
  • [10] Effect site concentrations of remifentanil and pupil response to noxious stimulation
    Barvais, L
    Engelman, E
    Eba, JM
    Coussaert, E
    Cantraine, F
    Kenny, GN
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 91 (03) : 347 - 352