Geotechnical reliability analysis with limited data: Consideration of model selection uncertainty

被引:58
|
作者
Zhang, J. [1 ]
Huang, H. W. [1 ]
Juang, C. H. [2 ]
Su, W. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Dept Geotech Engn, Minist Educ, Key Lab Geotech & Underground Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Clemson Univ, Glenn Dept Civil Engn, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
关键词
Probabilistic method; Failure probability; Model uncertainty; Slope stability; SPREAD FOUNDATIONS; DESIGN; FOOTINGS; IMPACT; RISK; LOAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.08.002
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The limited amount of data available in geotechnical practice makes it difficult to identify a unique probability model for the joint distribution of uncertain variables. Yet, the calculated failure probability can be sensitive to the probability model used, even if different models are calibrated based on the same data. The model selection uncertainty is a poorly understood area of research in current geotechnical practice. In this study, we show how to construct candidate probability models based upon the copula theory to more realistically model the soil data with explicit consideration of the possible non-linear dependence relationship between random variables. The authors used a Bayesian method to quantify the model selection uncertainty and to compare the validity of the candidate models. A model averaging method that combines predictions from competing models was then developed to deal with the situation when the effect of model selection uncertainty cannot be neglected. Averaging over the reliability index seems more plausible than averaging over the failure probability in geotechnical reliability analyses. To reduce the computational work, models with significantly less model probabilities can be removed from the model averaging process without an obvious effect on the prediction accuracy. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 37
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability analysis of motorcycle crash severity outcomes: Consideration of model selection uncertainty
    Yu, Qiong
    Zhou, Yue
    Li, Haibo
    Jiang, Xinguo
    TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION, 2022, 23 (06) : 377 - 383
  • [2] Model uncertainty representation in geotechnical reliability analyses
    Ronold, Knut O.
    Bjerager, Peter
    Journal of geotechnical engineering, 1992, 118 (03): : 363 - 376
  • [3] MODEL UNCERTAINTY REPRESENTATION IN GEOTECHNICAL RELIABILITY ANALYSES
    RONOLD, KO
    BJERAGER, P
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1992, 118 (03): : 363 - 376
  • [4] MODEL UNCERTAINTY REPRESENTATION IN GEOTECHNICAL RELIABILITY ANALYSES
    TANG, WH
    GILBERT, RB
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1993, 119 (11): : 1859 - 1861
  • [5] A hybrid data-driven model for geotechnical reliability analysis
    Liu, Wenli
    Li, Ang
    Fang, Weili
    Love, Peter E. D.
    Hartmann, Timo
    Luo, Hanbin
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2023, 231
  • [6] MODEL UNCERTAINTY REPRESENTATION IN GEOTECHNICAL RELIABILITY ANALYSES - CLOSURE
    RONOLD, KO
    BJERAGER, P
    JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1993, 119 (11): : 1861 - 1862
  • [7] Reliability analysis with consideration of asymmetrically dependent variables: Discussion and application to geotechnical examples
    Zhang, Yi
    Gomes, Antonio Topa
    Beer, Michael
    Neumann, Ingo
    Nackenhorst, Udo
    Kim, Chul-Woo
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2019, 185 : 261 - 277
  • [8] A reliability analysis framework coupled with statistical uncertainty characterization for geotechnical engineering
    Han, Liang
    Zhang, Wengang
    Wang, Lin
    Fu, Jia
    Xu, Liang
    Wang, Yu
    GEOSCIENCE FRONTIERS, 2024, 15 (06)
  • [9] An index of effective number of variables for uncertainty and reliability analysis in model selection problems
    Martino, Luca
    Morgado, Eduardo
    Castillo, Roberto San Millan
    SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2025, 227
  • [10] An optimal model using data envelopment analysis for uncertainty metrics in reliability
    Zu, Tianpei
    Kang, Rui
    Wen, Meilin
    Yang, Yi
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2018, 22 (16) : 5561 - 5568