An aerosol activation metamodel of v1.2.0 of the pyrcel cloud parcel model: development and offline assessment for use in an aerosol-climate model

被引:5
|
作者
Rothenberg, Daniel [1 ]
Wang, Chien [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Dept Earth Atmospher & Planetary Sci, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
COMMUNITY ATMOSPHERE MODEL; DROPLET FORMATION; PART I; CONDENSATION NUCLEI; PARAMETERIZATION; NUMBER; IMPACT; REPRESENTATION; SIMULATIONS; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.5194/gmd-10-1817-2017
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
We describe an emulator of a detailed cloud parcel model which has been trained to assess droplet nucleation from a complex, multimodal aerosol size distribution simulated by a global aerosol-climate model. The emulator is constructed using a sensitivity analysis approach (polynomial chaos expansion) which reproduces the behavior of the targeted parcel model across the full range of aerosol properties and meteorology simulated by the parent climate model. An iterative technique using aerosol fields sampled from a global model is used to identify the critical aerosol size distribution parameters necessary for accurately predicting activation. Across the large parameter space used to train them, the emulators estimate cloud droplet number concentration (CDNC) with a mean relative error of 9.2% for aerosol populations without giant cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and 6.9% when including them. Versus a parcel model driven by those same aerosol fields, the best-performing emulator has a mean relative error of 4.6 %, which is comparable with two commonly used activation schemes also evaluated here (which have mean relative errors of 2.9 and 6.7 %, respectively). We identify the potential for regional biases in modeled CDNC, particularly in oceanic regimes, where our best-performing emulator tends to overpredict by 7 %, whereas the reference activation schemes range in mean relative error from 3 to 7 %. The emulators which include the effects of giant CCN are more accurate in continental regimes (mean relative error of 0.3 %) but strongly overestimate CDNC in oceanic regimes by up to 22 %, particularly in the Southern Ocean. The biases in CDNC resulting from the subjective choice of activation scheme could potentially influence the magnitude of the indirect effect diagnosed from the model incorporating it.
引用
收藏
页码:1817 / 1833
页数:17
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Aerosol activation and cloud processing in the global aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM
    Roelofs, G. J.
    Stier, P.
    Feichter, J.
    Vignati, E.
    Wilson, J.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2006, 6 : 2389 - 2399
  • [2] Technical Note: On the use of nudging for aerosol-climate model intercomparison studies
    Zhang, K.
    Wan, H.
    Liu, X.
    Ghan, S. J.
    Kooperman, G. J.
    Ma, P. -L.
    Rasch, P. J.
    Neubauer, D.
    Lohmann, U.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2014, 14 (16) : 8631 - 8645
  • [3] Assessment of cloud condensation nucleus activation of urban aerosol particles with different hygroscopicity and the application to the cloud parcel model
    Kawana, Kaori
    Kuba, Naomi
    Mochida, Michihiro
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2014, 119 (06) : 3352 - 3371
  • [4] The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3-Part 2: Cloud evaluation, aerosol radiative forcing, and climate sensitivity
    Neubauer, David
    Ferrachat, Sylvaine
    Siegenthaler-Le Drian, Colombe
    Stier, Philip
    Partridge, Daniel G.
    Tegen, Ina
    Bey, Isabelle
    Stanelle, Tanja
    Kokkola, Harri
    Lohmann, Ulrike
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 12 (08) : 3609 - 3639
  • [5] Prognostic parameterization of cloud ice with a single category in the aerosol-climate model ECHAM(v6.3.0)-HAM(v2.3)5
    Dietlicher, Remo
    Neubauer, David
    Lohmann, Ulrike
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 11 (04) : 1557 - 1576
  • [6] Integration of prognostic aerosol-cloud interactions in a chemistry transport model coupled offline to a regional climate model
    Thomas, M. A.
    Kahnert, M.
    Andersson, C.
    Kokkola, H.
    Hansson, U.
    Jones, C.
    Langner, J.
    Devasthale, A.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 8 (06) : 1885 - 1898
  • [7] Separating radiative forcing by aerosol-cloud interactions and rapid cloud adjustments in the ECHAM-HAMMOZ aerosol-climate model using the method of partial radiative perturbations
    Muelmenstaedt, Johannes
    Gryspeerdt, Edward
    Salzmann, Marc
    Ma, Po-Lun
    Dipu, Sudhakar
    Quaas, Johannes
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2019, 19 (24) : 15415 - 15429
  • [8] Improvement of cloud microphysics in the aerosol-climate model BCC_AGCM2.0.1_CUACE/Aero, evaluation against observations, and updated aerosol indirect effect
    Wang, Zhili
    Zhang, Hua
    Lu, Peng
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2014, 119 (13) : 8400 - 8417
  • [9] Spatio-temporal assessment of aerosol and cloud properties using MODIS satellite data and a HYSPLIT model: Implications for climate and agricultural systems
    Haseeb, Muhammad
    Tahir, Zainab
    Mahmood, Syed Amer
    Batool, Saira
    Tariq, Aqil
    Lu, Linlin
    Soufan, Walid
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT-X, 2024, 21
  • [10] Development and basic evaluation of a prognostic aerosol scheme (v1) in the CNRM Climate Model CNRM-CM6
    Michou, M.
    Nabat, P.
    Saint-Martin, D.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 8 (03) : 501 - 531