Urban and social impacts of Waterfronts Development, case study: Jeddah Corniche

被引:18
|
作者
Mostafa, Lobna A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Effat Univ, Jeddah 21478, Saudi Arabia
[2] Menia Univ, Menia, Egypt
来源
GREEN URBANISM (GU) | 2017年 / 37卷
关键词
Public Waterfront; community development; urban development; social impact; Jeddah Cornish;
D O I
10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.035
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Waterfront development has always been a common topic of interest in urban studies. Through the special nature of coastal areas, urban development of these places has its own characteristics that influenced by the typology, view, land value and environmental factors. In addition, social factors, that include community characteristics, local culture and traditions affect and receive effects from this development. Development of waterfronts plans should adhere to the notion that the waterfront is an inherently public asset. Planning a waterfront development, required the city officials or a developer to start by envisioning a network of well-connected, multi-use public spaces that fit with the community's shared goals. By orienting waterfront revitalization around public spaces, new urban design should enhance the quality of existing destinations and that results in a whole city identity that is greater than the sum of its parts. This research discusses both urban and social impacts of waterfronts development, taking Jeddah Cornish development as a case study. The research aims at pointing out the main impacts of waterfront development on both Jeddah Urban development and social development. The research's methodology follows both quantitative and qualitative methods, and conducting a community survey that measure the main impacts of Cornish Jeddah development project. The research concludes the main impacts of waterfront development to assure its sustainability. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 221
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deriving Urban Design Principles for Jeddah Corniche Developments: User-Preferences Approach
    Oudah, Reem Fuad
    Ragab, Tarek
    Shokry, Mohammed
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND ENGINEERING 2019, 2019, 385
  • [2] Tweets of Transformation: Investigating Tactical Urbanism and Social Interactions in Jeddah's Colorful Corniche Initiative
    Imam, Ayman
    Hamad, Eradah O.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (18)
  • [3] A social-ecological perspective for emerging cities: The case of Corniche promenade, "urban majlis" of Doha
    Furlan, Raffaello
    Grosvald, Michael
    Azad, Aamna
    JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 6 (02)
  • [4] Embodied climate impacts in urban development: a neighbourhood case study
    Sjokvist, Simon
    Francart, Nicolas
    Balouktsi, Maria
    Birgisdottir, Harpa
    BUILDINGS & CITIES, 2025, 6 (01): : 25 - 49
  • [5] The realities of integrating physical planning and local management into urban development: A case study of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
    Mandeli, Khalid Nasralden
    HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 32 (04) : 512 - 533
  • [6] Urban Farming as a Measure of Urban Resiliency the Case of Jeddah
    Aljohani, Yara
    Ragab, Tarek S.
    Mohammed, F. M. Mohammed
    MAN AND PLACE, 2024, : 17 - 31
  • [7] Mapping Opportunities for Floating Urban Development Along Italian Waterfronts
    Calcagni, Livia
    Battisti, Alessandra
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (05)
  • [8] The Landscape Catalytic Effect of Urban Waterfronts-A Case Study of the Huangpu River in Shanghai
    Yin, Yuting
    Ma, Dongbo
    Xu, Xiran
    LAND, 2025, 14 (02)
  • [9] Making a case for social impact assessment in urban development: Social impacts and legal disputes in Queensland, Australia
    Miller, Evonne
    Buys, Laurie
    INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON INTERDISCIPLINARY BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES 2012 (ICIBSOS 2012), 2012, 65 : 285 - 292
  • [10] The impacts of urban pricing on social and spatial inequalities: The case study of Lyon (France)
    Souche, Stephanie
    Mercier, Aurelie
    Ovtracht, Nicolas
    URBAN STUDIES, 2016, 53 (02) : 373 - 399