Are Endoscopic Therapies Appropriate for Superficial Submucosal Esophageal Adenocarcinoma? An Analysis of Esophagectomy Specimens

被引:153
|
作者
Sepesi, Boris
Watson, Thomas J.
Zhou, David [2 ]
Polomsky, Marek
Litle, Virginia R.
Jones, Carolyn E.
Raymond, Daniel P.
Hu, Rui [3 ]
Qiu, Xing [3 ]
Peters, Jeffrey H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Dept Surg, Sch Med & Dent, Div Thorac & Foregut Surg, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Dept Biostat & Computat Biol, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
关键词
HIGH-GRADE DYSPLASIA; LYMPH-NODE METASTASIS; BARRETTS-ESOPHAGUS; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; TUMOR INVASION; RESECTION; NEOPLASIA; CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.003
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection and ablation have advanced the treatment of intramucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma and have been promoted as definitive therapy for selected superficial submucosal tumors. Controversy exists regarding the prevalence of nodal metastases at various depths of mucosal and submucosal invasion. Our aim was to clarify this prevalence and identify predictors of nodal spread. STUDY DESIGN: An expert gastrointestinal pathologist retrospectively reviewed 54 T1 adenocarcinomas from 258 esophagectomy specimens (2000 to 2008). Tumors were classified as intramucosal or submucosal, the latter being subclassified as SM1 (upper third), SM2 (middle third), or SM3 (lower third) based on the depth of tumor invasion. The depth of invasion was correlated with the prevalence of positive nodes. Fisher's exact test and univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify variables predicting nodal disease. RESULTS: Nodal metastases were present in 0% (0 of 25) of intramucosal, 21% (3 of 14) of SM1, 36% (4 of 11) of SM2, and 50% (2 of 4) of SM3 tumors. The differences were significant between intramucosal and submucosal tumors (p < 0.0001), although not between the various subclassifications of submucosal tumors (p = 0.503). Univariate logistic regression identified poor differentiation (p = 0.024), lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.049), and number of harvested lymph nodes (p = 0.037) as significantly correlated with nodal disease. Multivariate logistic regression did not identify any of the tested variables as independent predictors of the prevalence of positive lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: All depths of submucosal invasion of esophageal adenocarcinoma were associated with an unacceptably high prevalence of nodal metastases and a marked increase relative to intramucosal cancer. Accurate predictors of nodal spread, independent of tumor depth, are currently lacking and will be necessary before recommending endoscopic resection with or without concomitant ablation as curative treatment for even superficial submucosal neoplasia. (J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210:418-427. (C) 2010 by the American College of Surgeons)
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 427
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinicopathologic correlations of superficial esophageal adenocarcinoma in endoscopic submucosal dissection specimens
    Dhingra, Sadhna
    Bahdi, Firas
    May, Sarah B.
    Othman, Mohamed O.
    DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [2] Clinicopathologic correlations of superficial esophageal adenocarcinoma in endoscopic submucosal dissection specimens
    Sadhna Dhingra
    Firas Bahdi
    Sarah B. May
    Mohamed O. Othman
    Diagnostic Pathology, 16
  • [3] ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION VERSUS ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR THE TREATMENT OF SUPERFICIAL ESOPHAGEAL LESIONS: A RETROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
    Bazarbashi, Ahmad Najdat
    McCarty, Thomas R.
    Redd, Walker D.
    Hathorn, Kelly
    Jajoo, Kunal
    Thompson, Christopher C.
    Aihara, Hiroyuki
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 91 (06) : AB154 - AB155
  • [4] Outcomes after endoscopic mucosal resection or esophagectomy for submucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma
    Nelson, David B.
    Dhupar, Rajeev
    Katkhuda, Riham
    Correa, Arlene
    Goltsov, Alexei
    Maru, Dipen
    Sepesi, Boris
    Antonoff, Mara B.
    Mehran, Reza J.
    Rice, David C.
    Vaporciyan, Ara A.
    Davila, Marta
    Davila, Raquel
    Betancourt, Sonia
    Ajani, Jaffer
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 156 (01): : 406 - +
  • [5] Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer in the remnant esophagus after esophagectomy
    Suzuki, Yugo
    Kikuchi, Daisuke
    Nakamura, Satoshi
    Iizuka, Toshiro
    Ochiai, Yorinari
    Hayasaka, Junnosuke
    Ueno, Masaki
    Udagawa, Harushi
    Hoteya, Shu
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2024, 37 (12)
  • [6] Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma
    Oyama, Tsuneo
    Hotta, Kinichi
    Tomori, Akihisa
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 65 (05) : AB110 - AB110
  • [7] Outcomes after endoscopic mucosal resection or esophagectomy for submucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma Discussion
    Darling, Gail E.
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Meyers, Bryan Fitch
    Lerut, Toni
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 156 (01): : 412 - 413
  • [8] Is less really more? Endoscopic mucosal resection versus esophagectomy for submucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma
    Raja, Siva
    Bribriesco, Alejandro C.
    Sanaka, Madhu R.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 156 (01): : 414 - 415
  • [9] Outcomes of Primary Esophagectomy and Esophagectomy after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity-Score-Matched Analysis
    Kim, Minjee
    Kim, Tae Jun
    Kim, Ga Hee
    Lee, Yeong Chan
    Lee, Hyuk
    Min, Byung-Hoon
    Lee, Jun Haeng
    Rhee, Poong-Lyul
    Kim, Jae J.
    Min, Yang Won
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (23)
  • [10] Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer
    Aadam, A. A.
    Abe, S.
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2018, 31 (07)