Cytogenetics in reproductive medicine: the contribution of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)

被引:38
|
作者
Wells, D
Levy, B
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, London, England
[2] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Human Genet, New York, NY USA
[3] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Pediat, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/bies.10232
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Cytogenetic research has had a major impact on the field of reproductive medicine, providing an insight into the frequency of chromosomal abnormalities that occur during gametogenesis, embryonic development and pregnancy. In humans, aneuploidy has been found to be relatively common during fetal life, necessitating prenatal screening of high-risk pregnancies. Aneuploidy rates are higher still during the preimplantation stage of development. An increasing number of IVF laboratories have attempted to improve pregnancy rates by using preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to ensure that the embryos transferred to the mother are chromosomally normal. This paper reviews some of the techniques that are key to the detection of aneuploidy in reproductive samples including comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). CGH has provided an unparalleled insight into the nature of chromosome imbalance in human embryos and polar bodies. The clinical application of CGH for the purposes of PGD and the future extensions of the methodology, including DNA microarrays, are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 300
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contribution of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to the classification of diffuse gliomas
    Guidara, Souhir
    Barritault, Marc
    Alix, Eudeline
    Sanlaville, Damien
    Meyronet, David
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 429
  • [2] Comparison of Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) to FISH and Cytogenetics in Prognostic Evaluation of CLL
    Giudice, C.
    Chang, A. S.
    Chang, D.
    Barry, T. S.
    Hibbard, M. K.
    Chen, S.
    Chen, R.
    O'Malley, D. P.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2010, 90 : 297A - 297A
  • [3] Comparison of Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH) to FISH and Cytogenetics in Prognostic Evaluation of CLL
    Giudice, C.
    Chang, A. S.
    Chang, D.
    Barry, T. S.
    Hibbard, M. K.
    Chen, S.
    Chen, R.
    O'Malley, D. P.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2010, 23 : 297A - 297A
  • [4] COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION (CGH) AND CYTOGENETICS PROVIDE COMPLEMENTARY INFORMATION TO IDENTIFY GENETIC ABNORMALITIES IN AML
    AVETLOISEAU, H
    THEIL, K
    MCCONNELL, T
    WILLMAN, CL
    ATWATER, S
    PALLAVICINI, MG
    BLOOD, 1994, 84 (10) : A599 - A599
  • [5] COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION IN CLINICAL CYTOGENETICS
    BRYNDORF, T
    KIRCHHOFF, M
    ROSE, H
    MAAHR, J
    GERDES, T
    KARHU, R
    KALLIONIEMI, A
    CHRISTENSEN, B
    LUNDSTEEN, C
    PHILIP, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1995, 57 (05) : 1211 - 1220
  • [6] Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) of augmentation cystoplasties
    Appanna, Timson C.
    Doak, Shareen H.
    Jenkins, Spencer A.
    Kynaston, Howard G.
    Stephenson, Timothy P.
    Parry, James M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 14 (06) : 539 - 544
  • [7] Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH): ten years of substantial progress in human solid tumor molecular cytogenetics
    Gebhart, E
    CYTOGENETIC AND GENOME RESEARCH, 2004, 104 (1-4) : 352 - 358
  • [8] Comparative genomic hybridization as a tool in tumour cytogenetics
    James, LA
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1999, 187 (04): : 385 - 395
  • [9] DNA in situ hybridization (interphase cytogenetics) versus comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in human cancer: detection of numerical and structural chromosome aberrations
    Van Dekken, H
    Krijtenburg, PJ
    Alers, JC
    ACTA HISTOCHEMICA, 2000, 102 (01) : 85 - 94
  • [10] COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION (CGH) FINDINGS IN BELLINI DUCT CARCINOMAS
    Becker, F.
    Junker, K.
    Hartmann, A.
    Grobholz, R.
    Pflugmann, T.
    Siemer, S.
    Stoeckle, M.
    Wullich, B.
    Jung, V.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2009, 8 (04) : 378 - 378