On the use of the E-value for sensitivity analysis in epidemiologic studies

被引:1
|
作者
Rigo Vale, Conceicao Christina [1 ]
de Oliveira Almeida, Nubia Karla [2 ]
Varnier Rodrigues de Almeida, Renan Moritz [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Inst Alberto Luiz Coimbra Posgrad & Pesquisa Engn, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Fluminense, Dept Estat, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
来源
CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA | 2021年 / 37卷 / 06期
关键词
Measures of Association; Exposure; Risk or Outcome; Observational Studies as Topic; Health Care Outcome Assessment; RISK-FACTORS;
D O I
10.1590/0102-311X00294720
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This study illustrates the use of a recently developed sensitivity index, the E-value, helpful in strengthening causal inferences in observational epidemiological studies. The E-value aims to determine the minimum required strength of association between an unmeasured confounder and an exposure/outcome to explain the observed association as non-causal. Such parameter is defined as, E-value = RR + root RR(RR - 1) where RR is the risk ratio between the exposure and the outcome. Our work illustrates the E-value using observational data from a recently published study on the relationship between indicators of prenatal care adequacy and the outcome low birthweight. The E-value ranged between 1.45 and 5.63 according to the category and prenatal care index evaluated, showing the highest value for the "no prenatal care" category of the GINDEX index and the minimum value for "intermediate prenatal care" of the APNCU index. For "inappropriate prenatal care" (all indexes), the E-value ranged between 2.76 (GINDEX) and 4.99 (APNCU). These findings indicate that only strong confounder/low birthweight associations (more than 400% increased risk) would be able to fully explain the prenatal care vs. low birthweight association observed. The E-value is a useful, intuitive sensitivity analysis tool that may help strengthening causal inferences in epidemiological observational studies.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Key concepts in clinical epidemiology: the use of the E-value for sensitivity analysis
    Chung, William T.
    Chung, Kevin C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 163 : 92 - 94
  • [2] Sensitivity Analysis in Observational Research: Introducing the E-Value
    VanderWeele, Tyler J.
    Ding, Peng
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 167 (04) : 268 - +
  • [3] A note on a sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding, and the related E-value
    Sjolander, Arvid
    JOURNAL OF CAUSAL INFERENCE, 2020, 8 (01) : 229 - 248
  • [4] Technical Considerations in the Use of the E-Value
    VanderWeele, Tyler J.
    Ding, Peng
    Mathur, Maya
    JOURNAL OF CAUSAL INFERENCE, 2019, 7 (02)
  • [5] SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: E-VALUE BASED ON DIRECT ADJUSTED SURVIVAL PROBABILITIES
    Zhang, Mei-Jie
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 55 (SUPPL 1) : 180 - 180
  • [6] Correcting Misinterpretations of the E-Value
    VanderWeele, Tyler J.
    Mathur, Maya B.
    Ding, Peng
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 170 (02) : 131 - +
  • [7] Are Observational Studies on Distal Radius Fracture Treatment Robust? An E-value Approach to Analysis
    Wang, Chien-Wei
    Chung, William T.
    Baxter, Natalie B.
    Chung, Kevin C.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2023, 481 (06) : 1174 - 1192
  • [8] CORR Insights®: Are Observational Studies on Distal Radius Fracture Treatment Robust? An E-value Approach to Analysis
    Ring, David C.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2023, 481 (06) : 1193 - 1195
  • [9] Add e-value to our future!
    O'Brien, AT
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2003, 81 (48) : 46 - 46
  • [10] A method for sample size calculation via E-value in the planning of observational studies
    Fang, Yixin
    He, Weili
    Hu, Xiaofei
    Wang, Hongwei
    PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2021, 20 (01) : 163 - 174