An intercomparison of long-term planetary boundary layer heights retrieved from CALIPSO, ground-based lidar, and radiosonde measurements over Hong Kong

被引:75
|
作者
Su, Tianning [1 ]
Li, Jing [2 ]
Li, Chengcai [2 ]
Xiang, Pengzhan [2 ]
Lau, Alexis Kai-Hon [3 ,4 ]
Guo, Jianping [5 ]
Yang, Dongwei [2 ]
Miao, Yucong [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Peking Univ, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Environm, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Acad Meteorol Sci, State Key Lab Severe Weather, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
planetary boundary layer height; CALIPSO space lidar; maximum standard deviation method; wavelet covariance transform method; micropulse lidar; radiosonde; ENTRAINMENT ZONE THICKNESS; REANALYSIS DATA; MIXING HEIGHT; MIXED-LAYER; BACKSCATTER; DEPTH; CHINA; VARIABILITY; ATMOSPHERE; PROFILES;
D O I
10.1002/2016JD025937
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The planetary boundary layer height (PBLH) is a very important parameter in the atmosphere, because it determines the range where the most effective dispersion processes take place, and serves as a constraint on the vertical transport of heat, moisture, and pollutants. As the only space-borne lidar, Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization onboard Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) measures the vertical distribution of aerosol signals and thus offers the potential to retrieve large-scale PBLH climatology. In this study, we explore different techniques for retrieving PBLH from CALIPSO measurements and validate the results against those obtained from ground-based micropulse lidar (MPL) and radiosonde (RS) data over Hong Kong, where long-term MPL and RS measurements are available. Two methods, namely maximum standard deviation (MSD) and wavelet covariance transform (WCT), are used to retrieve PBLH from CALIPSO. Results show that the RS- and MPL-derived PBLHs share similar interannual variation and seasonality and can complement each other. Both MSD and WCT perform reasonably well compared with MPL/RS products, especially under sufficient aerosol loading. Uncertainties increase when aerosol loading is low and the CALIPSO signal consequently becomes noisier. Overall, CALIPSO captures the general PBLH seasonal variability over Hong Kong, despite a high bias in spring and a low bias in summer. The spring high bias is likely associated with elevated aerosol layers due to transport, while the summer low bias can be attributed to higher noise level associated with weaker aerosol signal.
引用
收藏
页码:3929 / 3943
页数:15
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] PBL-height derivation from the CALIOP/CALIPSO and comparing with the radiosonde and ground-based lidar measurements
    Wu, Yonghua
    Gan, Chuen-Meei
    Cordero, Lina
    Gross, Barry
    Moshary, Fred
    Ahmed, Sam
    LIDAR TECHNOLOGIES, TECHNIQUES, AND MEASUREMENTS FOR ATMOSPHERIC REMOTE SENSING VI, 2010, 7832
  • [2] Intercomparisons of cloud-top and cloud-base heights from ground-based Lidar, CloudSat and CALIPSO measurements
    Kim, Sang-Woo
    Chung, Eui-Seok
    Yoon, Soon-Chang
    Sohn, Byung-Ju
    Sugimoto, Nobuo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2011, 32 (04) : 1179 - 1197
  • [3] Long-term trends of global maximum atmospheric mixed layer heights derived from radiosonde measurements
    Li, Jing
    Chu, Yiqi
    Li, Xichen
    Dong, Yueming
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (03)
  • [4] Intercomparison of long-term ground-based measurements of total, tropospheric, and stratospheric ozone at Lauder, New Zealand
    Bjorklund, Robin
    Vigouroux, Corinne
    Effertz, Peter
    Garcia, Omaira E.
    Geddes, Alex
    Hannigan, James
    Miyagawa, Koji
    Kotkamp, Michael
    Langerock, Bavo
    Nedoluha, Gerald
    Ortega, Ivan
    Petropavlovskikh, Irina
    Poyraz, Deniz
    Querel, Richard
    Robinson, John
    Shiona, Hisako
    Smale, Dan
    Smale, Penny
    Van Malderen, Roeland
    De Maziere, Martine
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2024, 17 (23) : 6819 - 6849
  • [5] Improving Daytime Planetary Boundary Layer Height Determination from CALIOP: Validation Based on Ground-Based Lidar Station
    Liu, Zhao
    Mortier, Augustin
    Li, Zhengqiang
    Hou, Weizhen
    Goloub, Philippe
    Lv, Yang
    Chen, Xingfeng
    Li, Donghui
    Li, Kaitao
    Xie, Yisong
    ADVANCES IN METEOROLOGY, 2017, 2017
  • [6] Long-Term Ground-Based Measurements of Aerosol Optical Depth over Kuwait City
    Kokkalis, Panagiotis
    Al Jassar, Hala K.
    Solomos, Stavros
    Raptis, Panagiotis-Ioannis
    Al Hendi, Hamad
    Amiridis, Vassilis
    Papayannis, Alexandros
    Al Sarraf, Hussain
    Al Dimashki, Marwan
    REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (11):
  • [7] Ground-based water vapor raman lidar measurements up to the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere for long-term monitoring
    Leblanc, T.
    McDermid, I. S.
    Walsh, T. D.
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2012, 5 (01) : 17 - 36
  • [9] Determination of Planetary Boundary Layer Height on Short Spatial and Temporal Scales: A Demonstration of the Covariance Wavelet Transform in Ground-Based Wind Profiler and Lidar Measurements
    Compton, Jaime C.
    Delgado, Ruben
    Berkoff, Timothy A.
    Hoff, Raymond M.
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 30 (07) : 1566 - 1575