Prospective cross-validation of three methods of predicting failing pregnancies of unknown location

被引:21
|
作者
Condous, G. [1 ]
Van Calster, B.
Kirk, E.
Timmerman, D.
Van Huffel, S.
Bourne, T.
机构
[1] St Georges Univ London, Early Pregnancy Gynaecol Ultrasound & MAS Unit, London, England
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Elect Engn, ESAT, Louvain, Belgium
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, ESAT, Hosp Gasthuisberg, Louvain, Belgium
[4] Univ Sydney, Nepean Hosp, Nepean Clin Sch, Early Pregnancy Unit,Nepean Ctr Perinatal Care &, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
failing pregnancy of unknown location; hCG ratio; logistic regression; progesterone;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/del460
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: We compared the performance of each of three tests for predicting pregnancy failure in the pregnancy of unknown (PUL) population. METHODS: In a prospective observational study, we compared the performance of three models for the prediction of pregnancy failure in women with a PUL: (i) logistic-regression model incorporating vaginal bleeding, endometrial thickness (ET), initial serum progesterone and hCG levels; (ii) serum progesterone at 0 h; and (3) the hCG ratio. RESULTS: A total of 5942 consecutive pregnant women attending the Early Pregnancy Unit were scanned and 439 (7.4%) were classified as PULs. Of these women, 420 had complete data for serum hCG at 0 and 48 h, the hCG ratio, serum progesterone at 0 h, vaginal bleeding and ET. The final outcomes were 219 (52.1%) failing PULs, 167 (39.8%) intra-uterine pregnancies and 34 (8.1%) ectopic pregnancies. For the prediction of pregnancy failure in the PUL population, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for the logistic-regression model was 0.907 (Standard error (SE) 0.015), the AUC for serum progesterone was 0.952 (SE 0.010) and the AUC for the hCG ratio was 0.980 (SE 0.004). This improved performance of the hCG ratio was significant when compared with that of initial serum progesterone (P = 0.0076) and the logistic-regression model (P < 0.0001). Using the hCG ratio cut-offs of < 0.87 and < 0.79, the serum progesterone cut-off of < 20 mnol 1-1 and the logistic-regression cut-off of > 70% for the prediction of failing PUL, sensitivities were 86.3 and 82.2% (S), 87.2% (NS) and 78.1% (S), specificities were 97.0 and 98.0% (NS), 89.6% (S) and 88.6% (S), positive-likelihood ratios were 28.91, 41.30, 8.34 and 6.82 and negative-likelihood ratios were 0.14, 0.18, 0.14 and 0.25, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The hCG ratio seems to be an optimal test for the prediction of pregnancy failure in a PUL population. The hCG ratio cut-off of 0.79 is recommended on the basis of minimizing risk to those PULs discharged at 48 h. Most importantly, when the hCG ratio is below a particular cut-off, these women can be discharged at 48 h without intervention and need for further follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:1156 / 1160
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Failing pregnancies of unknown location: a prospective evaluation of the human chorionic gonadotrophin ratio
    Condous, G
    Kirk, E
    Van Calster, B
    Van Huffel, S
    Timmerman, D
    Bourne, T
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (05) : 521 - 527
  • [2] Predicting outcomes in pregnancies of unknown location
    Kirk, Emma
    Bourne, Tom
    WOMENS HEALTH, 2008, 4 (05) : 491 - 499
  • [3] Cross-validation methods
    Browne, MW
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 44 (01) : 108 - 132
  • [4] Validation and Cross-Validation Methods for ASCAT
    Anderson, Craig
    Figa-Saldana, Julia
    Wilson, John Julian William
    Ticconi, Francesca
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 10 (05) : 2232 - 2239
  • [5] An application of methods for the probabilistic three-class classification of pregnancies of unknown location
    Van Calster, Ben
    Condous, George
    Kirk, Emma
    Bourne, Tom
    Timmerman, Dirk
    Van Huffel, Sabine
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2009, 46 (02) : 139 - 154
  • [6] Comparisons between Three Cross-Validation Methods for Measuring Learners' Performances
    Cernezel, Ales
    Rozman, Ivan
    Brumen, Bostjan
    INFORMATION MODELLING AND KNOWLEDGE BASES XXVI, 2014, 272 : 77 - 87
  • [7] AN EVALUATION OF 2 METHODS OF CROSS-VALIDATION
    MCCORNACK, RL
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1959, 5 (01) : 127 - 130
  • [8] Retrospective validation of a model to predict the outcome of pregnancies of unknown location
    Dap, M.
    Chaillot, M.
    Rouche, J.
    de Malartic, C. Mezan
    Morel, O.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2022, 50 (05): : 390 - 394
  • [9] CROSS-VALIDATION OF BIOANALYTICAL METHODS BETWEEN LABORATORIES
    GILBERT, MT
    BARINOVCOLLIGON, I
    MIKSIC, JR
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 1995, 13 (4-5) : 385 - 394
  • [10] Cross-validation of three jump power equations
    Sayers, SP
    Harackiewicz, DV
    Harman, EA
    Frykman, PN
    Rosenstein, MT
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1999, 31 (04): : 572 - 577