Identifying factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images

被引:3
|
作者
Sun, Yuqi [1 ]
Wang, Simin [2 ,3 ]
Liu, Ziang [4 ]
You, Chao [2 ,3 ]
Li, Ruimin [2 ,3 ]
Mao, Ning [5 ]
Duan, Shaofeng [6 ]
Lynn, Henry S. [1 ]
Gu, Yajia [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Minist Educ, Dept Biostat,Key Lab Publ Hlth Safety, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Dept Radiol, Shanghai Canc Ctr, 270 Dongan Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Dept Oncol, 270 Dongan Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Qingdao Univ, Yantai Yuhuangding Hosp, Dept Radiol, Qingdao 264000, Shandong, Peoples R China
[6] GE Healthcare China, 1 Huatuo Rd, Shanghai 210000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Mammography; Breast Cancer; Radiomics; Artifact; SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; ARTIFACTS; DIAGNOSIS; CHALLENGES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s40644-022-00460-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Radiomics plays an important role in the field of oncology. Few studies have focused on the identification of factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models. The goal of this study was to use contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images to identify factors that may potentially influence the performance of radiomics models in diagnosing breast lesions. Methods A total of 157 women with 161 breast lesions were included. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and the random forest (RF) algorithm were employed to construct radiomics models. The classification result for each lesion was obtained by using 100 rounds of five-fold cross-validation. The image features interpreted by the radiologists were used in the exploratory factor analyses. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the association between the image features and misclassification. Additional exploratory analyses were performed to examine the findings. Results Among the lesions misclassified by both LASSO and RF >= 20% of the iterations in the cross-validation and those misclassified by both algorithms <= 5% of the iterations, univariate analysis showed that larger lesion size and the presence of rim artifacts and/or ripple artifacts were associated with more misclassifications among benign lesions, and smaller lesion size was associated with more misclassifications among malignant lesions (all p < 0.050). Multivariate analysis showed that smaller lesion size (odds ratio [OR] = 0.699, p = 0.002) and the presence of air trapping artifacts (OR = 35.568, p = 0.025) were factors that may lead to misclassification among malignant lesions. Additional exploratory analyses showed that benign lesions with rim artifacts and small malignant lesions (< 20 mm) with air trapping artifacts were misclassified by approximately 50% more in rate compared with benign and malignant lesions without these factors. Conclusions Lesion size and artifacts in CEM images may affect the diagnostic performance of radiomics models. The classification results for lesions presenting with certain factors may be less reliable.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Identifying factors that may influence the classification performance of radiomics models using contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images
    Yuqi Sun
    Simin Wang
    Ziang Liu
    Chao You
    Ruimin Li
    Ning Mao
    Shaofeng Duan
    Henry S. Lynn
    Yajia Gu
    Cancer Imaging, 22
  • [2] Radiomics for Predicting Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: Insights from Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM)
    Piccolo, Claudia Lucia
    Sarli, Marina
    Pileri, Matteo
    Tommasiello, Manuela
    Rofena, Aurora
    Guarrasi, Valerio
    Soda, Paolo
    Beomonte Zobel, Bruno
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (21)
  • [3] Classification of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) images
    Perek, Shaked
    Kiryati, Nahum
    Zimmerman-Moreno, Gali
    Sklair-Levy, Miri
    Konen, Eli
    Mayer, Arnaldo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2019, 14 (02) : 249 - 257
  • [4] Classification of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) images
    Shaked Perek
    Nahum Kiryati
    Gali Zimmerman-Moreno
    Miri Sklair-Levy
    Eli Konen
    Arnaldo Mayer
    International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2019, 14 : 249 - 257
  • [5] Factors Influencing Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Images
    Wessling, Daniel
    Maennlin, Simon
    Schwarz, Ricarda
    Hagen, Florian
    Brendlin, Andreas
    Gassenmaier, Sebastian
    Preibsch, Heike
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (19)
  • [6] Radiomics Analysis on Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography Images for Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Pilot Study
    Losurdo, Liliana
    Fanizzi, Annarita
    Basile, Teresa Maria A.
    Bellotti, Roberto
    Bottigli, Ubaldo
    Dentamaro, Rosalba
    Didonna, Vittorio
    Lorusso, Vito
    Massafra, Raffaella
    Tamborra, Pasquale
    Tagliafico, Alberto
    Tangaro, Sabina
    La Forgia, Daniele
    ENTROPY, 2019, 21 (11)
  • [7] Predicting Malignancy of Breast Imaging Findings Using Quantitative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM)
    Miller, Matthew M.
    Rubaiyat, Abu Hasnat Mohammad
    Rohde, Gustavo K.
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (06)
  • [8] Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence Analysis with Textural Metrics Extracted by Contrast-Enhanced Mammography in the Breast Lesions Classification
    Fusco, Roberta
    Piccirillo, Adele
    Sansone, Mario
    Granata, Vincenza
    Rubulotta, Maria Rosaria
    Petrosino, Teresa
    Barretta, Maria Luisa
    Vallone, Paolo
    Di Giacomo, Raimondo
    Esposito, Emanuela
    Di Bonito, Maurizio
    Petrillo, Antonella
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (05)
  • [9] Diagnostic Value of Radiomics Analysis in Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography for Identifying Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Zhang, Yongxia
    Liu, Fengjie
    Zhang, Han
    Ma, Heng
    Sun, Jian
    Zhang, Ran
    Song, Lei
    Shi, Hao
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [10] Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography (CEM) for Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response among Different Breast Cancer Subtypes
    Vidali, Sofia
    Irmici, Giovanni
    Depretto, Catherine
    Bellini, Chiara
    Pugliese, Francesca
    Incardona, Ludovica Anna
    Di Naro, Federica
    De Benedetto, Diego
    Di Filippo, Giacomo
    Ferraro, Fabiola
    De Berardinis, Claudia
    Miele, Vittorio
    Scaperrotta, Gianfranco
    Nori Cucchiari, Jacopo
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (15)