Data analysis methods for evaluating lithographic performance

被引:18
|
作者
Ferguson, RA [1 ]
Martino, RM [1 ]
Brunner, TA [1 ]
机构
[1] IBM Microelect, Semicond Res & Dev Ctr, Hopewell Junction, NY 12533 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1116/1.589653
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Lithographic improvements obtained from process modifications or application of optical enhancement techniques can often be obscured within experimental noise and inconsistent data analysis techniques. At IBM, the need for a common platform for the accurate analysis of lithographic data led to the development of a new software analysis package entitled LEOPOLD. In this article, the exposure-defocus methodology taken by LEOPOLD for accurate calculation of the total lithographic process window in the presence of experimental noise is outlined; the extension of this method to the evaluation of the common process window through applications in the areas of optical proximity effects, analysis of optical enhancement techniques, and across-field exposure tool characterization is also demonstrated. (C) 1997 American Vacuum Society.
引用
收藏
页码:2387 / 2393
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Data analysis methods for evaluating lithographic performance
    Ferguson, Richard A.
    Martino, Ronald M.
    Brunner, Timothy A.
    Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics Processing and Phenomena, 1997, 15 (06):
  • [2] ELECTRICAL TEST METHODS FOR EVALUATING LITHOGRAPHIC PROCESSES AND EQUIPMENT
    YEN, D
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY OF PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS, 1982, 342 : 73 - 81
  • [3] The analysis of the criteria of phase error by evaluating the influence of lens aberration on the lithographic performance
    Jeong, CY
    Ahn, JK
    Park, KY
    Choi, JS
    Lee, JG
    Optical Microlithography XVIII, Pts 1-3, 2005, 5754 : 1681 - 1692
  • [4] Methods for evaluating lithographic performance of exposure tools for the 45nm node: ECD and scatterometry
    Huang, K
    Rice, BJ
    Coombs, B
    Freed, R
    METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR MICROLITHOGRAPHY XVIII, PTS 1 AND 2, 2004, 5375 : 494 - 502
  • [5] PERFORMANCE OF THE BOOTSTRAP AND JACKKNIFE METHODS IN EVALUATING DATA
    ALIMOV, YI
    SHAEVICH, AB
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1993, 48 (05) : 601 - 603
  • [6] Evaluating the performance of sparse principal component analysis methods in high-dimensional data scenarios
    Bonner, Ashley J.
    Beyene, Joseph
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2017, 46 (05) : 3794 - 3811
  • [7] Evaluating Performance of Missing Data Imputation Methods in IRT Analyses
    Kalkan, Omur Kaya
    Kara, Yusuf
    Kelecioglu, Hulya
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ASSESSMENT TOOLS IN EDUCATION, 2018, 5 (03): : 403 - 416
  • [8] Evaluating Sampling Methods for Content Analysis of Twitter Data
    Kim, Hwalbin
    Jang, S. Mo
    Kim, Sei-Hill
    Wan, Anan
    SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY, 2018, 4 (02): : 1 - 10
  • [9] Analysis of the performance of operational data analysis methods
    Conti, C
    Dehombreux, P
    Verlinden, O
    Datoussaid, S
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1996, 10 (05) : 579 - 593
  • [10] Data analysis methods for evaluating cardiovascular disease in patients
    Hussein W.N.
    Mohammed Z.M.
    Almnaseer Z.A.
    Measurement: Sensors, 2023, 25