Open data and open code for big science of science studies

被引:46
作者
Light, Robert P. [1 ]
Polley, David E. [1 ]
Boerner, Katy [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Informat & Comp, Cyberinfrastruct Network Sci Ctr, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Open data; Visualization software; Big data; Scalability; Workflows;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-014-1238-2
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Historically, science of science (Sci2) studies have been performed by single investigators or small teams. As the size and complexity of data sets and analyses scales up, a "Big Science'' approach (Price, Little science, big science, 1963) is required that exploits the expertise and resources of interdisciplinary teams spanning academic, government, and industry boundaries. Big Sci2 studies utilize "big data'', i.e., large, complex, diverse, longitudinal, and/or distributed datasets that might be owned by different stake-holders. They apply a systems science approach to uncover hidden patterns, bursts of activity, correlations, and laws. They make available open data and open code in support of replication of results, iterative refinement of approaches and tools, and education. This paper introduces a database-tool infrastructure that was designed to support big Sci2 studies. The open access Scholarly Database (http://sdb.cns.iu.edu) provides easy access to 26 million paper, patent, grant, and clinical trial records. The open source Sci2 tool (http://sci2.cns.iu.edu) supports temporal, geospatial, topical, and network studies. The scalability of the infrastructure is examined. Results show that temporal analyses scale linearly with the number of records and file size, while the geospatial algorithm showed quadratic growth. The number of edges rather than nodes determined performance for network based algorithms.
引用
收藏
页码:1535 / 1551
页数:17
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Alencar A, 2010, CISHELL EXTRACT DIRE
[2]  
Biberstine J. R., 2011, CISHELL PROPORTIONAL
[3]  
Biberstine J. R., 2012, CISHELL PROPORTIONAL
[4]   Design and Update of a Classification System: The UCSD Map of Science [J].
Boerner, Katy ;
Klavans, Richard ;
Patek, Michael ;
Zoss, Angela M. ;
Biberstine, Joseph R. ;
Light, Robert P. ;
Lariviere, Vincent ;
Boyack, Kevin W. .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (07)
[5]   Plug-and-Play Macroscopes [J].
Boerner, Katy .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2011, 54 (03) :60-69
[6]   Science Mapping Software Tools: Review, Analysis, and Cooperative Study Among Tools [J].
Cobo, M. J. ;
Lopez-Herrera, A. G. ;
Herrera-Viedma, E. ;
Herrera, F. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 62 (07) :1382-1402
[7]  
De Solla Price D., 1963, Little Science, Big Science
[8]  
Johnson D. W., 2008, GRAPH INT C 2008 WIN
[9]  
Kendall E.F., 2019, Ontology engineering, DOI [10.1007/978-3-031-79486-5, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-79486-5]
[10]   Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams [J].
Kleinberg, J .
DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, 2003, 7 (04) :373-397