Open innovation and company culture: Internal openness makes the difference

被引:124
|
作者
Kratzer, Jan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Meissner, Dirk [5 ]
Roud, Vitaly [6 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Entrepreneurship & Innovat Management, Berlin, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Berlin, Ctr Entrepreneurship CfE, Berlin, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Berlin, Fac Econ & Business, Res & Internationalizat, Berlin, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Berlin, Acad Board, Berlin, Germany
[5] Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econ, Moscow, Russia
[6] Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econ, Lab Econ Innovat, Moscow, Russia
关键词
Open innovation; Company culture; Human resource for innovation; Innovation climate; Innovation culture; S-AND-T; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; CREATIVITY; INDUSTRY; MODES;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.022
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
There is a common agreement that innovation is driven by the people that form the heart of any company's innovation activity. Still, people perform innovation in a special institutional environment characterized by rules and regulations that might support or impede innovation. The open innovation paradigm expects companies to engage in external relationships for innovation; however companies often neglect the actual internal openness of employees, which is an absolute must before partnering with external partner's. The article finds that company innovation culture comes in five main forms: closed innovation (driven by internal capabilities); doing, using, interacting (ad hoc processes, no link to knowledge providers); outsourcing innovation capabilities; extramural innovation, no matching internal culture/procedures and proactive innovation (match of internal and external openness). The empirical analysis shows that the closed innovation behavior is by far the most widespread among Russian companies whereas proactive innovation behavior remains an exception in the overall sample. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 138
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Relations between Innovation Openness (Open Innovation) and the Innovation Potential of SMEs
    Stanislawski, Robert
    Lisowska, Renata
    2ND GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS, ECONOMICS, MANAGEMENT AND TOURISM, 2015, 23 : 1521 - 1526
  • [2] Open innovation: it starts with the leader's openness
    Gomezel, Alenka Slavec
    Rangus, Kaja
    INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT, 2019, 21 (04): : 533 - 551
  • [3] The Openness of Open Innovation in the Product Development Process
    Zafar, Afnan
    INTELLIGENT HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 2021, 2021, 1322 : 685 - 690
  • [4] WHAT A CULTURE A DIFFERENCE MAKES - REJOINDER
    SIMPKINS, G
    WILLIAMS, RL
    GUNNINGS, T
    HARVARD EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 1971, 41 (04) : 535 - 541
  • [5] Is Your Company Ready for Open Innovation?
    Lichtenthaler, Ulrich
    Hoegl, Martin
    Muethel, Miriam
    MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2011, 53 (01) : 45 - 48
  • [6] Contributions of Open Innovation for a Communication Company
    da Silva, Breno Eustquio
    de Ramos Neves, Jorge Tadeu
    Reis Lobo Vasconcelos, Maria Celeste
    Avila Araujo, Carlos Alberto
    REVISTA GESTAO & TECNOLOGIA-JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 13 (02): : 222 - 246
  • [7] Open science in China: Openness, economy, freedom & innovation
    Zhang, Xiyuan
    Reindl, Stefan
    Tian, Hongjun
    Gou, Minghan
    Song, Ruijie
    Zhao, Taoran
    Jackson, Liz
    Jandric, Petar
    EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHY AND THEORY, 2023, 55 (04) : 432 - 445
  • [8] How Do Internal Openness and External Openness Affect Innovation Capabilities and Firm Performance?
    Wu, Yi-Ching
    Lin, Bou-Wen
    Chen, Chung-Jen
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2013, 60 (04) : 704 - 716
  • [9] Are You Open? An Investigation of the Concept of Openness for Knowledge and Innovation
    Penin, Julien
    REVUE ECONOMIQUE, 2013, 64 (01): : 133 - 148
  • [10] The difference that makes the difference: a conceptual analysis of the open dialogue approach
    Galbusera, Laura
    Kyselo, Miriam
    PSYCHOSIS-PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIAL AND INTEGRATIVE APPROACHES, 2018, 10 (01): : 47 - 54