PRISMA-Children (C) and PRISMA-Protocol for Children (P-C) Extensions: a study protocol for the development of guidelines for the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of newborn and child health research

被引:20
|
作者
Kapadia, Mufiza Z. [1 ]
Askie, Lisa [2 ]
Hartling, Lisa [3 ]
Contopoulos-Ioannidis, Despina [4 ,5 ]
Bhutta, Zulfiqar A. [1 ]
Soll, Roger [6 ,7 ]
Moher, David [8 ]
Offringa, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Hosp Sick Children, Res Inst, Dept Child Hlth Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
[2] Univ Sydney, NHMRC Clin Trials Ctr, Systemat Reviews & Hlth Technol Assessment, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Univ Alberta, Dept Pediat, Alberta Res Ctr Hlth Evidence, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Pediat, Div Infect Dis, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Meta Res Innovat Ctr Stanford METRICS, Stanford, CA USA
[6] Univ Vermont, Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Burlington, VT USA
[7] Vermont Oxford Network, Burlington, VT USA
[8] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ctr Practice Changing Res, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2016年 / 6卷 / 04期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
SEARCH STRATEGIES; PLACEBO;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010270
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Paediatric systematic reviews differ from adult systematic reviews in several key aspects such as considerations of child tailored interventions, justifiable comparators, valid outcomes and child sensitive search strategies. Available guidelines, including PRISMA-P (2015) and PRISMA (2009), do not cover all the complexities associated with reporting systematic reviews in the paediatric population. Using a collaborative, multidisciplinary structure, we aim to develop evidence-based and consensus-based PRISMA-P-C (Protocol for Children) and PRISMA-C (Children) Extensions to guide paediatric systematic review protocol and completed review reporting. Methods and analysis: This project's methodology follows published recommendations for developing reporting guidelines and involves the following six phases; (1) establishment of a steering committee representing key stakeholder groups; (2) a scoping review to identify potential Extension items; (3) three types of consensus activities including meetings of the steering committee to achieve high-level decisions on the content and methodology of the Extensions, a survey of key stakeholders to generate a list of possible items to include in the Extensions and a formal consensus meeting to select the reporting items to add to, or modify for, the Extension; (4) the preliminary checklist items generated in phase III will be evaluated against the existing evidence and reporting practices in paediatric systematic reviews; (5) extension statements and explanation and elaboration documents will provide detailed advice for each item and examples of good reporting; (6) development and implementation of effective knowledge translation of the extension checklist, and an evaluation of the Extensions by key stakeholders. Ethics and Dissemination: This protocol was considered a quality improvement project by the Hospital for Sick Children's Ethics Committee and did not require ethical review. The resultant checklists, jointly developed with all relevant stakeholders, will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals as well as national and international conference presentations. Endorsement of the checklist will be sought simultaneously in multiple journals.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 1 条
  • [1] Update to the PRISMA guidelines for network meta-analyses and scoping reviews and development of guidelines for rapid reviews: a scoping review protocol
    Veroniki, Areti Angeliki
    Hutton, Brian
    Stevens, Adrienne
    Mckenzie, Joanne E.
    Page, Matthew J.
    Moher, David
    Mcgowan, Jessie
    Straus, Sharon E.
    Li, Tianjing
    Munn, Zachary
    Pollock, Danielle
    Colquhoun, Heather
    Godfrey, Christina
    Smith, Maureen
    Tufte, Janice
    Logan, Sherrie
    Catala-Lopez, Ferran
    Tovey, David
    Franco, Juan V. A.
    Chang, Stephanie
    Garritty, Chantelle
    Hartling, Lisa
    Horsley, Tanya
    Langlois, Etienne V.
    Mcinnes, Matthew
    Offringa, Martin
    Welch, Vivian
    Pritchard, Chris
    Khalil, Hanan
    Mittmann, Nicole
    Peters, Micah
    Konstantinidis, Menelaos
    Elsman, Ellen B. M.
    Kelly, Shannon E.
    Aldcroft, Adrian
    Thirugnanasampanthar, Sai Surabi
    Dourka, Jasmeen
    Neupane, Dipika
    Well, George
    Akl, Elie
    Wilson, Michael
    Soares-Weiser, Karla
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2025, 23 (03) : 517 - 526