Feasibility of Biogas Production from Napier Grass

被引:36
|
作者
Sawasdee, Vanatpornratt [1 ]
Pisutpaisal, Nipon [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Naresuan Univ, Fac Sci, Sch Renewable Energy Technol, Muang 65000, Phitsanulok, Thailand
[2] King Mongkuts Univ Technol North Bangkok, Fac Sci Appl, Dept Agroind Food & Environm Technol, Bangkok 10800, Thailand
[3] King Mongkuts Univ Technol North Bangkok, Biosensor & Bioelect Technol Ctr, Bangkok 10800, Thailand
关键词
Napier grass; mesophillic batch reactor; anaerobic sludge; benefit/cost ratio;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.1064
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The current study focused on the feasibility of biogas production from Napier grass. Napier grass, a tropical plant, can grow up in drought and dry conditions. Napier grass contains 30.9% total carbohydrates, 27% protein, lipid 14.8%, total ash 18.2%, fiber 9.1% (dry weight). Its organic compositions are an ideal feedstock for biogas production. The fresh grass was harvested after 5 week plantation, grounded in 0.5 to 1 mm diameter size before fermentation in mesophilic batch reactors, with varying solid concentrations of 5 - 15 %. The optimum condition for the biogas production was found at 5% solid concentration. Methane content, yield and production rate were 53%, 122.4 mL CH4/g TVS remove, 4.8 mL/ht at the optimum condition. Economic analysis of biogas obtained from the experiment with liquid petroleum gas (LPG) with benefit/cost ratio (B/C ratio) greater than 1 suggested that the Napier grass is considered as a potential energy crop. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1229 / 1233
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biogas production from 3 strains of Napier grass
    Sirirote, Pramote
    Promma, Farida
    Thanaboripat, Dusanee
    NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2014, 31 : S97 - S97
  • [2] Economic Feasible Evaluation of Biogas Production from Napier Grass
    Vanatpornratt, Sawasdee
    Nipon, Pisutpaisal
    RESEARCH JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2015, 10 (03): : 94 - 98
  • [3] Effects of microorganisms from cow and buffalo rumen on biogas production from Napier grass and rice straw
    Sawanon, Suriya
    Sangsri, Piyanee
    Sinbuathong, Nusara
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2021, 24 (02) : 149 - 161
  • [4] Assessment of organosolv, hydrothermal, and combined organosolv and hydrothermal with enzymatic pretreatment to increase the production of biogas from Napier grass and Napier silage
    Jomnonkhaow, Umarin
    Sittijunda, Sureewan
    Reungsang, Alissara
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 181 : 1237 - 1249
  • [5] ASSESSMENT OF BIOGAS GENERATION POTENTIAL OF NAPIER GRASS
    Deshmukh, Anuradha
    Nagarnaik, P. B.
    Daryapurkar, R. A.
    2015 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TRENDS IN ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY (ICETET), 2015, : 68 - 71
  • [6] Biogas Production from Single Digestion of Napier Grass Hydrolysate and Co-Digestion of Solid Fraction of Microwave Acid Pretreated Napier Grass with Swine Manure
    Kongjan, Prawit
    Reungsang, Alissara
    Phasukarratchai, Naphatsarnan
    Sittijunda, Sureewan
    CHIANG MAI JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2019, 46 (04): : 639 - 652
  • [7] Influences of size reduction, hydration, and thermal-assisted hydration pretreatment to increase the biogas production from Napier grass and Napier silage
    Jomnonkhaow, Umarin
    Sittijunda, Sureewan
    Reungsang, Alissara
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 331
  • [8] Biogas Production from Napier Grass (Pak Chong 1) (Pennisetum purpureum x Pennisetum americanum)
    Janejadkarn, Apiwaj
    Chavalparit, Orathai
    MATERIAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY II, 2014, 856 : 327 - 332
  • [9] Bioenergy production from roadside grass: A case study of the feasibility of using roadside grass for biogas production in Denmark
    Meyer, A. K. P.
    Ehimen, E. A.
    Holm-Nielsen, J. B.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2014, 93 : 124 - 133
  • [10] Biotechnological application of sustainable biogas production through dry anaerobic digestion of Napier grass
    Natthawud Dussadee
    Rameshprabu Ramaraj
    Tapana Cheunbarn
    3 Biotech, 2017, 7