Couch height-based patient setup for abdominal radiation therapy

被引:5
|
作者
Ohira, Shingo [1 ,2 ]
Ueda, Yoshihiro [1 ,3 ]
Nishiyama, Kinji [4 ]
Miyazaki, Masayoshi [1 ]
Isono, Masaru [1 ]
Tsujii, Katsutomo [1 ]
Takashina, Masaaki [2 ]
Koizumi, Masahiko [2 ]
Kawanabe, Kiyoto [1 ]
Teshima, Teruki [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Med Ctr Canc & Cardiovasc Dis, Dept Radiat Oncol, Osaka, Japan
[2] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Med Phys & Engn, Suita, Osaka, Japan
[3] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Suita, Osaka, Japan
[4] Yao Municipal Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Yao, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Couch; Skin mark; Abdominal cancer; Setup; CORRECTION PROTOCOL; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; PANCREATIC-CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; GEMCITABINE; LOCALIZATION; FEASIBILITY; SURGERY; BREAST;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2015.08.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
There are 2 methods commonly used for patient positioning in the anterior-posterior (A-P) direction: one is the skin mark patient setup method (SMPS) and the other is the couch height based patient setup method (CHPS). This study compared the setup accuracy of these 2 methods for abdominal radiation therapy. The enrollment for this study comprised 23 patients with pancreatic cancer. For treatments (539 sessions), patients were set up by using isocenter skin marks and thereafter treatment couch was shifted so that the distance between the isocenter and the upper side of the treatment couch was equal to that indicated on the computed tomographic (CT) image. Setup deviation in the A-P direction for CHPS was measured by matching the spine of the digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) of a lateral beam at simulation with that of the corresponding time-integrated electronic portal image. For SMPS with no correction (SMPS/NC), setup deviation was calculated based on the couch-level difference between SMPS and CHPS. SMPS/NC was corrected using 2 off-line correction protocols: no action level (SMPS/NAL) and extended NAL (SMPS/eNAL) protocols. Margins to compensate for deviations were calculated using the Stroom formula. A-P deviation > 5 mm was observed in 17% of SMPS/NC, 4% of SMPS/NAL, and 4% of SMPS/eNAL sessions but only in one CHPS session. For SMPS/NC, 7 patients (30%) showed deviations at an increasing rate of > 0.1 mm/fraction, but for CHPS, no such trend was observed. The standard deviations (SDs) of systematic error (Sigma) were 2.6, 1.4, 0.6, and 0.8 mm and the root mean squares of random error (a) were 2.1, 2.6, 2.7, and 0.9 mm for SMPS/NC, SMPS/NAL, SMPS/eNAL, and CHPS, respectively. Margins to compensate for the deviations were wide for SMPS/NC (6.7 mm), smaller for SMPS/NAL (4.6 mm) and SMPS/eNAL (3.1 mm), and smallest for CHPS (2.2 mm). Achieving better setup with smaller margins, CHPS appears to be a reproducible method for abdominal patient setup. (C) 2016 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 63
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Couch-Height Based Patient Setup for Abdominal Radiation Therapy
    Oohira, S.
    Ueda, Y.
    Nishiyama, K.
    Miyazaki, M.
    Isono, M.
    Katsutomo, T.
    Takashina, M.
    Koizumi, M.
    Kawanabe, K.
    Teruki, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S827 - S828
  • [2] Effectiveness of couch height-based patient set-up and an off-line correction protocol in prostate cancer radiotherapy
    van Lin, ENJT
    Nijenhuis, E
    Huizenga, H
    van der Vight, L
    Visser, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 50 (02): : 569 - 577
  • [3] A HEIGHT-BASED NOMENCLATURE OF GREATNESS
    RAPPORT, RL
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1992, 76 (04) : 726 - 726
  • [4] CAMERA-BASED INDEPENDENT COUCH HEIGHT VERIFICATION IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY
    Kusters, M.
    Louwe, R.
    Biemans-vanKastel, L.
    Nieuwenkamp, H.
    Zahradnik, R.
    Claessen, R.
    van Seters, R.
    Huizenga, H.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 : S525 - S525
  • [5] Camera-based independent couch height verification in radiation oncology
    Kusters, Martijn
    Louwe, Rob
    Biemans-van Kastel, Liesbeth
    Nieuwenkamp, Henk
    Zahradnik, Rien
    Claessen, Roy
    van Seters, Ronald
    Huizenga, Henk
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 16 (05): : 442 - 446
  • [6] Height-based deformation and ray supersampling for colon unfolding
    Ahn, Honam
    Shin, Byeong-Seok
    ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL REALITY AND TELE-EXISTENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4282 : 1098 - +
  • [7] Height-based model for the categorization of athletes in combat sports
    Beslija, Tea
    Cular, Drazen
    Kezic, Ana
    Tomljanovic, Mario
    Ardigo, Luca Paolo
    Dhabhi, Wissem
    Padulo, Johnny
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SPORT SCIENCE, 2021, 21 (04) : 471 - 480
  • [8] MRI-Based Treatment Simulation and Patient Setup for Radiation Therapy of Brain Cancer
    Yang, Y.
    Cao, M.
    Han, F.
    Santhanam, A.
    Neylon, J.
    Gomez, C.
    Kaprealian, T.
    Sheng, K.
    Agazaryan, N.
    Low, D.
    Hu, P.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 176 - 176
  • [9] The Usefulness of a Virtual Environment-Based Patient Setup Training System for Radiation Therapy
    Fujibuchi, Toshioh
    Kaneko, Kosuke
    Arakawa, Hiroyuki
    Okada, Yoshihiro
    JOURNAL OF IMAGING, 2024, 10 (08)
  • [10] Accuracy of UTE-MRI-based patient setup for brain cancer radiation therapy
    Yang, Yingli
    Cao, Minsong
    Kaprealian, Tania
    Sheng, Ke
    Gao, Yu
    Han, Fei
    Gomez, Caitlin
    Santhanam, Anand
    Tenn, Stephen
    Agazaryan, Nzhde
    Low, Daniel A.
    Hu, Peng
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (01) : 262 - 267