Social Media Competition for User Satisfaction: A Niche Analysis of Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Pinterest, and Twitter

被引:0
|
作者
Kweon, Sang-Hee [1 ]
Kang, Bo Young [1 ]
Ma, Liyao [1 ]
Guo, Wei [1 ]
Tian, Zaimin [1 ]
Kim, Se-jin [2 ]
Kweon, Heaji [3 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Social media; Niche breadth; Niche overlap; Competitive superiority;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-20454-9_24
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper explores five social media's media ecological location in the social user through niche analysis of five key SNS services (Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Pinterest, and Twitter). Based on the results of 224 SNS user's questionnaire, factor analysis was carried out to extract five common factors of relationship, sociality, convenience, routine, and entertainment. The results of the niche analysis showed that Facebook had the widest niche in sociality (.627) and convenience (.636), and YouTube showed the widest niche in routine (.670) and entertainment (.615). For relationship (.520), Instagram had the widest niche. In terms of five factors, Facebook and YouTube have the greatest overlap in relationship (1.826) and sociality (2.696), while Pinterest and Twitter had the biggest overlap in routine (1.937); entertainment (2.263) and convenience (2.583). Besides, YouTube and Twitter had the most overlap. Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube had a competitive advantage over Pinterest in terms of all factors.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 249
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Managing your social campaign strategy using Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube & Pinterest: An interview with Dana Howard, social media marketing manager
    Howard, Dana
    Mangold, W. Glynn
    Johnston, Tim
    BUSINESS HORIZONS, 2014, 57 (05) : 657 - 665
  • [2] Representativeness of Social Media in Great Britain: Investigating Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Pinterest, Google plus , and Instagram
    Blank, Grant
    Lutz, Christoph
    AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2017, 61 (07) : 741 - 756
  • [3] Social media platforms for politics: A comparison of Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, Reddit, Snapchat, and WhatsApp
    Boulianne, Shelley
    Hoffmann, Christian P.
    Bossetta, Michael
    NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2024,
  • [4] Commentary: Impact of social media applications like Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube on ophthalmological education
    Kaur, Kirandeep
    Gurnani, Bharat
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 70 (09) : 3253 - 3254
  • [5] Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest and co.: body image and social media
    Genevieve Pepin
    Natalie Endresz
    Journal of Eating Disorders, 3 (Suppl 1)
  • [6] Social Media as a Learning Media: A Comparative Analysis of Youtube, WhatsApp, Facebook and Instagram Utillization
    Patmanthara, Syaad
    Febiharsa, Dhega
    Dwiyanto, Felix Andika
    2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONICS AND INFORMATION ENGINEERING (ICEEIE), 2019, : 183 - 186
  • [7] Assessment of the Medical Reliability of Videos on Social Media: Detailed Analysis of the Quality and Usability of Four Social Media Platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube)
    Gurler, Deniz
    Buyukceran, Ismail
    HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (10)
  • [8] TRANSVERSAL POLARISED DISCOURSE ABOUT "IMMIGRATION" THROUGH MULTIPLE SOCIAL MEDIA: TWITTER, FACEBOOK, INSTAGRAM, YOUTUBE
    de Rosa, Annamaria Silvana
    Bocci, Elena
    Salvati, Marco
    Latini, Martina
    Bonito, Mattia
    Carpignano, Nicola
    Nubola, Antonio
    Palombi, Tommaso
    Tovo, Giampaolo
    14TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED2020), 2020, : 3257 - 3267
  • [9] Social media influence on young people and children: Analysis on Instagram, Twitter and YouTube
    Lozano-Blasco, Raquel
    Mira-Aladren, Marta
    Gil-Lamata, Mercedes
    COMUNICAR, 2023, 31 (74) : 125 - 137
  • [10] UTILIZATION OF FACEBOOK, TWITTER, YOUTUBE AND INSTAGRAM IN THE PROSTATE CANCER COMMUNITY
    Struck, Julian
    Siegel, Fabian
    Kramer, Mario
    Tsaur, Igor
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Haferkamp, Axel
    Merseburger, Axel
    Borgmann, Hendrik
    Salem, Johannes
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E484 - E485