Social psychological predictors of satisfaction with intrapartum and postpartum care - what matters to women in Czech maternity hospitals?

被引:11
|
作者
Takacs, Lea [1 ]
Seidlerova, Jitka Mlikova [2 ]
Sulova, Lenka [1 ]
Hoskovcova, Simona Horakova [1 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Dept Psychol, Fac Arts & Philosophy, J Palacha 2, Prague 11638 1, Czech Republic
[2] Charles Univ Prague, Internal Dept 2, Fac Med Pilsen, Prague 11638 1, Czech Republic
来源
OPEN MEDICINE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
Maternity care; satisfaction with childbirth care; patient-caregiver relationship; women's health; patient satisfaction; PATIENT SATISFACTION; CONTINUOUS SUPPORT; CHILDBIRTH; STRESS; EXPERIENCE; BIRTH; LABOR; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1515/med-2015-0022
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify the social psychological factors affecting women's evaluation of care provided in Czech maternity hospitals using following criteria: satisfaction with intrapartum and postpartum care, willingness to return to a given hospital and to recommend the hospital to others. Methods: 762 women completed a 71-item original Czech questionnaire KLI-P designed to measure the psychosocial climate in both delivery and after-birth unit on six scales. The sample was representative of the Czech parturients population. Multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate the predictive value of the questionnaire scales for maternal satisfaction, willingness to return to and to recommend a given hospital. Results: For delivery unit, the satisfaction predictors were: helpfulness and empathy of midwives (chi(2)= 48.9), communication of information and availability of caregivers (chi(2)= 16.6), helpfulness and empathy of physicians (chi(2)= 10.9), symmetrical and respectful attitude of staff members (chi(2)= 9.7) and physical comfort and services (chi(2)= 7.6). The predictors of satisfaction with after-birth unit included helpfulness and empathy of the staff (chi(2)>= 42.1), communication of information and availability of caregivers (chi(2)= 52.5), physical comfort and services (chi(2)= 30.6), control and involvement in decision-making (chi(2)= 6.6) and parity (chi(2)= 8.6). The factors influencing women's willingness to return to and to recommend a hospital differed from the predictors of general satisfaction. Conclusions: The satisfaction factors revealed in this research correspond predominantly to the results of studies conducted in other countries (warm, non-formal and supportive approach, sufficient and well-timed provision of information and explanation, availability of caregivers, physical environment). However, participation in decision making, which has been repeatedly shown to be among the strongest predictors of childbirth satisfaction, was not important for the Czech parturients' satisfaction with intrapartal care. This finding can be explained by different attitudes and expectations of both parturients and caregivers in a post-totalitarian country.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 127
页数:9
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Maternal satisfaction with intrapartum care and associated factors among postpartum women at public hospitals of North Shoa Zone Ethiopia
    Silesh, Mulualem
    Lemma, Tesfanesh
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (12): : e0260710
  • [2] Women's satisfaction with intrapartum care and its predictors at Harar hospitals, Eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
    Getenet, Agegnehu Bante
    Roba, Kedir Teji
    Endale, Berhanu Seyoum
    Mamo, Abera Mersha
    Darghawth, Rasha
    NURSING-RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2019, 9 : 1 - 11
  • [3] Women's postnatal psychological functioning: the role of satisfaction with intrapartum care and the birth experience
    Michels, Allie
    Kruske, Sue
    Thompson, Rachel
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 31 (02) : 172 - 182
  • [4] Prevalence and predictors of perceived disrespectful maternity care in postpartum Iranian women: a cross-sectional study
    Hajizadeh, Khadije
    Vaezi, Maryam
    Meedya, Shahla
    Charandabi, Sakineh Mohammad Alizadeh
    Mirghafourvand, Mojgan
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [5] Prevalence and predictors of perceived disrespectful maternity care in postpartum Iranian women: a cross-sectional study
    Khadije Hajizadeh
    Maryam Vaezi
    Shahla Meedya
    Sakineh Mohammad Alizadeh Charandabi
    Mojgan Mirghafourvand
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 20
  • [6] Satisfaction with childbirth care in Brazilian maternity hospitals participating in the Stork Network program: women's opinions
    Santos, Yamme Ramos Portella
    de Carvalho, Thaiza Dutra Gomes
    Leal, Neide Pires
    Leal, Maria do Carmo
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2023, 39 (05):
  • [7] Advancing the health of women and newborns: predictors of patient satisfaction among women attending antenatal and maternity care in rural Rwanda
    Mutaganzwa, Christine
    Wibecan, Leah
    Iyer, Hari S.
    Nahimana, Evrard
    Manzi, Anatole
    Biziyaremye, Francois
    Nyishime, Merab
    Nkikabahizi, Fulgence
    Hirschhorn, Lisa R.
    Magge, Hema
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2018, 30 (10) : 793 - 801
  • [8] Continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) increases women’s satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care: results from the COSMOS randomised controlled trial
    Della A. Forster
    Helen L. McLachlan
    Mary-Ann Davey
    Mary Anne Biro
    Tanya Farrell
    Lisa Gold
    Maggie Flood
    Touran Shafiei
    Ulla Waldenström
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16
  • [9] Continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) increases women's satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care: results from the COSMOS randomised controlled trial
    Forster, Della A.
    McLachlan, Helen L.
    Davey, Mary-Ann
    Biro, Mary Anne
    Farrell, Tanya
    Gold, Lisa
    Flood, Maggie
    Shafiei, Touran
    Waldenstrom, Ulla
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2016, 16
  • [10] The Nature of Intrapartum Care in U. S. Hospitals: What Can We Learn From Grand Multiparous Women?
    Fleming, Susan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2010, 9 (04): : 470 - 470