Optimizing soybean plant population for a short-season production system in the southern USA

被引:83
|
作者
Ball, RA
Purcell, LC
Vories, ED
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Dept Crop & Soil Environm Sci, Fayetteville, AR 72704 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, NE Res & Extens Ctr, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Keiser, AR 72351 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2135/cropsci2000.403757x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production systems that utilize short-season cultivars for double cropping and late sowing often have insufficient time to establish a complete canopy prior to reproductive development. Our objectives were to evaluate plant population as a tool to manage crop growth, maximum biomass (BM), the time required for canopy closure, and yield, Field tests were sown on 8 July 1997 and 26 June 1998 at Keiser, AR (35 degrees 67' N, 90 degrees 83' W) in 0.19-, 0.57-, and 0.95-m rows with maturity group IV soybean cultivars Asgrow 4922 (A4922) and Manokin. Yield from irrigated and nonirrigated treatments increased as population density increased from 7 to 134 plants m(-2), except when lodging occurred. Populations recommended for early-season sowing (25-35 plants m(-2)) resulted in many plots not achieving 90% light interception (LI), especially in 1998 when weather was hotter and drier than in 1997, The time required after emergence to begin linear crop growth (t(b)) was dependent on LI, and as density increased, tb decreased. The values of t(b) varied from 16 to 27 d in 1997 and 22 to 37 d in 1998, with up to 12 d difference in achieving >90% LI, In this short-season production system, yield, crop growth rate between R1 and R5, BM, and t(b) were dependent upon the early establishment of a high LI, Losses attributable to excessive delays in canopy establishment and slow crop growth could be minimized by using high populations in narrow rows, Our research indicates that higher populations than are traditionally recommended provide a way to optimize grain yields in time-constrained systems.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 764
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Yield and risk utilizing short-season soybean production in the mid-southern USA
    Boquet, DJ
    CROP SCIENCE, 1998, 38 (04) : 1004 - 1011
  • [2] Genetic improvement rates of short-season soybean increase with plant population
    Cober, ER
    Morrison, MJ
    Ma, B
    Butler, G
    CROP SCIENCE, 2005, 45 (03) : 1029 - 1034
  • [3] Plant population density and maturity effects on profitability of short-season maize production in the midsouthern USA
    Popp, M
    Edwards, J
    Manning, P
    Purcell, LC
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2006, 98 (03) : 760 - 765
  • [4] Path analyses of population density effects on short-season soybean yield
    Ball, RA
    McNew, RW
    Vories, ED
    Keisling, TC
    Purcell, LC
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2001, 93 (01) : 187 - 195
  • [5] Short-season soybean yield compensation in response to population and water regime
    Ball, RA
    Purcell, LC
    Vories, ED
    CROP SCIENCE, 2000, 40 (04) : 1070 - 1078
  • [6] EVALUATION OF AN INTEGRATED SHORT-SEASON MANAGEMENT PRODUCTION SYSTEM FOR COTTON
    HEILMAN, MD
    NAMKEN, LN
    NORMAN, JW
    LUKEFAHR, MJ
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1979, 72 (06) : 896 - 900
  • [7] Maturity and pubescence color are associated in short-season soybean
    Cober, ER
    Voldeng, HD
    Morrison, MJ
    CROP SCIENCE, 1997, 37 (02) : 424 - 427
  • [8] When is short-season soybean most susceptible to drought?
    Morrison, M. J.
    McLauglin, N.
    Cober, E. R.
    Butler, G.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2006, 86 (05) : 1419 - 1419
  • [9] When is short-season soybean most susceptible to water stress?
    Morrison, M. J.
    McLaughlin, N. B.
    Cober, E. R.
    Butler, G. M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2006, 86 (05) : 1327 - 1331
  • [10] Plant population density effects on maize inbred lines grown in short-season environments
    Modarres, AM
    Hamilton, RI
    Dijak, M
    Dwyer, LM
    Stewart, DW
    Mather, DE
    Smith, DL
    CROP SCIENCE, 1998, 38 (01) : 104 - 108