Associations of Blood Analysis with Feed Efficiency and Developmental Stage in Grass-Fed Beef Heifers

被引:22
|
作者
Consolo, Nara R. B. [1 ]
Munro, Jasper C. [2 ]
Bourgon, Stephanie L. [3 ]
Karrow, Niel A. [4 ]
Fredeen, Alan H. [5 ]
Martell, Janel E. [6 ]
Montanholi, Yuri R. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Zootecnia, BR-13635900 Pirassununga, Brazil
[2] AgSights, Elora, ON N0B 1S0, Canada
[3] Univ Guelph, Ontario Vet Coll, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[4] Univ Guelph, Dept Anim Biosci, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[5] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Anim Sci & Aquaculture, Truro, NS B2N 5E3, Canada
[6] Harper Adams Univ, Anim Prod Welf & Vet Sci Dept, Newport TF10 8NB, Shrops, England
来源
ANIMALS | 2018年 / 8卷 / 08期
关键词
alkaline phosphatase; biomarker; hemoglobin; immunoglobulin; leukocyte; physiology indicator trait; potassium; pregnancy; residual feed intake; triiodothyronine; PLACENTAL ALKALINE-PHOSPHATASE; IMMUNE-RESPONSES; REFERENCE VALUES; THYROID-HORMONE; GROWTH-HORMONE; DAIRY-CATTLE; TRADE-OFFS; PARAMETERS; LACTATION; METABOLISM;
D O I
10.3390/ani8080133
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Individual cattle of identical developmental stage vary in their efficiency of feed utilization to achieve a similar productive performance in terms of growth rate and body composition upon accounting for breed, age and gestation stage. Technical issues to measure individual feed intake on the farm limits the identification of feed-efficient cattle. This creates a demand for indirect approaches to infer feed efficiency, such as blood parameters. Our study revealed differences in blood parameters when comparing grass-fed heifers classified as either efficient or inefficient. These differences were also influenced by the developmental stage of the heifers; some blood analytes had distinct relevance to infer about feed efficiency when comparing younger non-pregnant heifers with older and pregnant heifers. In general, improved feed efficiency seems to relate to a lower oxygen carrying capacity. We also provide evidence of associations between indicators of the immune system, blood enzymes and ions and feed efficiency. Additionally, blood analysis presented metabolic differences between non-pregnant heifers with older and pregnant heifers. Blood analysis as a practical measure for feed efficiency has relevance in the nutritional management and genetic improvement of beef cattle, which will contribute to the broad sustainability of beef farming. Abstract Proxies for feed efficiency, such as blood-based indicators, applicable across heifers varying in genetic makeup and developmental state are needed. Assessments of blood analytes and performance were made in heifer calves and pregnant heifers. Residual feed intake, a measure of feed efficiency, was used to categorize each population of heifers as either efficient or inefficient. Efficient heifer calves had lower mean cell hemoglobin, greater lymphocyte count, and fewer segmented neutrophils at the end of the test compared to inefficient calves. Efficient pregnant heifers had greater counts of lymphocytes with fewer segmented neutrophils at the end than inefficient pregnant heifers. Efficient heifer calves exhibited higher specific immunoglobulin M than inefficient calves. Throughout the test, efficient heifer calves had elevated potassium and phosphorus, and reduced alkaline phosphatase (ALP) compared to inefficient heifers. Efficient pregnant heifers showed greater ALP, non-esterified fatty acids and creatinine, but lower cholesterol and globulin than inefficient pregnant heifers. Levels of red and white blood cells, creatine kinase, cholesterol, glucose, potassium and phosphorus were higher in heifer calves compared with pregnant heifers. There is potential for blood analytes as proxies for feed efficiency; however, it is necessary to consider the inherent associations with feed efficiency and heifers' developmental stage.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GEORGIA - GRASS-FED BEEF CAPITAL
    REAGAN, JO
    GEORGIA AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1980, 21 (03): : 13 - 15
  • [2] SLAUGHTER RESULTS ANALYSIS OF GRASS-FED BEEF CATTLE
    Muizniece, Inga
    Kairisa, Daina
    RESEARCH FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2017, VOL 2, 2017, : 62 - 66
  • [3] US grass-fed beef premiums
    Wang, Yangchuan
    Isengildina-Massa, Olga
    Stewart, Shamar
    AGRIBUSINESS, 2023, 39 (03) : 664 - 690
  • [4] IMPETUS FOR GRASS-FED BEEF PRODUCTION IN THE BEEF BELT
    Romig, Kevin
    GEOGRAPHICAL REVIEW, 2013, 103 (01) : 112 - 120
  • [5] Analysis of preference for domestic grass-fed beef in Japanese youths
    Orime, Ai
    Yonezawa, Tomohiro
    Ogasawara, Hideki
    Kuroyanagi, Tadashi
    Manda, Tomiharu
    ANIMAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2012, 83 (03) : 268 - 271
  • [6] Grass-fed beef's carbon footprint
    Guglielmi, Giorgia
    SCIENCE, 2017, 358 (6359) : 16 - 16
  • [7] Aging increases lightness of grass-fed beef
    Wicks, Jordan C.
    Wivell, Alexis L.
    Beline, Mariane
    Zumbaugh, Morgan D.
    Bodmer, Jocelyn S.
    Yen, Con-Ning
    Wilson, Thomas B.
    Greiner, Scott P.
    Johnson, Sally E.
    Shi, Tim H.
    Silva, Saulo L.
    Gerrard, David E.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 8
  • [8] Ruminal Transcriptomic Analysis of Grass-Fed and Grain-Fed Angus Beef Cattle
    Li, Yaokun
    Carrillo, Jose A.
    Ding, Yi
    He, YangHua
    Zhao, Chunping
    Zan, Linsen
    Song, Jiuzhou
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06):
  • [9] Grass-Fed Beef: How is it Marketed by US Producers?
    Gillespie, Jeffrey
    Sitienei, Isaac
    Bhandari, Basu
    Scaglia, Guillermo
    INTERNATIONAL FOOD AND AGRIBUSINESS MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2016, 19 (02): : 171 - 188
  • [10] Producing grass-fed beef using the Herbopack approach
    Poncelet, R.
    Bonnault, R.
    FOURRAGES, 2017, (230): : 127 - 130