Management of isolated femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis

被引:20
|
作者
Qato, Khalil [1 ]
Conway, Allan M. [1 ]
Mondry, Laurie [1 ]
Giangola, Gary [1 ]
Carroccio, Alfio [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwell Hlth, Lenox Hill Hosp, Div Vasc Surg, New York, NY USA
关键词
Femoropopliteal stent; In-stent restenosis; Femoropopliteal occlusive disease; ANGIOPLASTY; BALLOON;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2018.01.030
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The optimal catheter-directed therapy for femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains controversial with limited durability. The natural history of untreated ISR is not well characterized. We evaluated the midterm outcomes of patients with asymptomatic isolated femoropopliteal ISR who were observed under a surveillance program. Methods: Patients treated with isolated femoropopliteal stents from January 2009 to December 2013 were retrospectively investigated for the development of ISR. ISR was classified on the basis of duplex ultrasound criteria, with > 50% defined as peak systolic velocity (PSV) twice that of the normal vessel and > 75% as PSV > 400 cm/s or four times the normal PSV. Asymptomatic patients with ISR of > 50% were tracked for progression to high-grade (> 75%) stenosis, occlusion, need for reintervention, and amputation. Results: Asymptomatic ISR of > 50% was identified in 62 (15.3%) of 402 patients with isolated femoropopliteal stents. The mean time for development of ISR was 22.1 (620.1) months. The mean age was 72 (69.7) years, and 34 (55.7%) patients were female. Thirty-one (50%) patients were diabetic, 18 (29.1%) were smokers, and 8 (12.9%) had chronic kidney disease. Indications for treatment were claudication in 49 (79.0%), tissue loss in 9 (14.5%), and rest pain in 4 (6.4%) patients. TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) A lesions were treated in 13 (21%) patients, TASC B lesions in 24 (38.7%), and TASC C lesions in 25 (40.3%). Three-vessel runoff was identified in 25 (40.3%) patients, two-vessel runoff in 18 (29.0%), and one-vessel runoff in 19 (30.6%). Under surveillance, ISR of > 50% progressed to > 75% or occlusion in 20 (32.3%) patients. The mean time to progression was 17.4 months, and the mean overall follow-up was 33.1 months. Reintervention was required in 22 (35.0%) patients, with an average of 1.95 (range, 1-4) interventions per patient. Reintervention was undertaken in 19 (86%) patients for claudication and in 3 (18%) patients for critical limb ischemia. One patient required an amputation despite previous reintervention for progression. Progression to > 75% stenosis was predictive of need for reintervention (P=.004). Conclusions: Under a surveillance program, asymptomatic patients with femoropopliteal ISR of > 50% may be observed with a low risk of limb loss. Given the slow rate of progression and the poor durability of reintervention, surveillance with delayed intervention may be warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:807 / 810
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Viabahn for Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis
    Al Shammeri, Owayed
    Bitar, Fahad
    Ghitelman, Jaime
    Soukas, Peter
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 56 (13) : B96 - B96
  • [2] Viabahn for femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis
    Al Shammeri, Owayed
    Bitar, Fahad
    Ghitelman, Jaime
    Soukas, Peter A.
    ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE, 2012, 32 (06) : 575 - 582
  • [3] Endovascular Management of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis: A Systematic Review
    Varela, Daniel L.
    Armstrong, Ehrin J.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2019, 20 (10) : 915 - 925
  • [4] Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery In-stent Restenosis
    Kim, Wonho
    Choi, Donghoon
    KOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2018, 48 (03) : 191 - 197
  • [5] Effective Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis With Stent Grafts
    Monahan, Thomas S.
    Vartanian, Shant
    Schneider, Darren B.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 54 (03) : 917 - 918
  • [6] Laser Atherectomy for Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis
    Armstrong, Ehrin J.
    Thiruvoipati, Thejasvi
    Tanganyika, Kundai
    Singh, Gagan D.
    Laird, John R.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2015, 22 (04) : 506 - 513
  • [7] The endovascular approach for in-stent restenosis in femoropopliteal disease
    Cannavale, Alessandro
    Tsetis, Dimitrios
    Krokidis, Miltiadis
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2015, 13 (04) : 391 - 401
  • [8] Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis What Is the Standard of Care?
    Rymer, Jennifer A.
    Jones, W. Schuyler
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 11 (12)
  • [9] Femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis: current treatment strategies
    Singh, G. D.
    Armstrong, E. J.
    Laird, J. R.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 55 (03): : 325 - 333
  • [10] The Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis Back to the Future
    Laird, John R.
    Yeo, Khung Keong
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 59 (01) : 24 - 25