Rationalization in Korea container terminal using DEA cross-efficiency and cluster analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Kim, Sungki [1 ]
Kim, Chanho [1 ]
Kim, Sangyoul [2 ]
Choi, Sanggyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Maritime Inst, Port Operat Dept, Pusan 49111, South Korea
[2] Pusan Natl Univ, Grad Sch Int Studies, Busan 46241, South Korea
来源
关键词
Rationalization; Terminal efficiency; Data envelopment analysis; Cluster analysis; SELECTION; PORTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajsl.2021.12.002
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Ports and container terminals today are interchanges for maritime and land transport as well as important facilities that serve as communication channels for nations, regional economies, and forelands. They also act as suppliers providing cargo handling and international logistics services at the national level. Traditionally, the port industry was less competitive than other industries. However, competition among terminals is intensifying due to recent environmental changes, and the excessive competition between Korean container terminals has produced negative effects. Therefore, it is necessary to establish terminal rationalization plans to resolve excessive competition among container terminals at the national level. This study examined the direction for terminal rationalization at the national level to alleviate excessive competition among container terminals based on the theory of supply base rationalization. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) cross-efficiency and cluster analysis were combined to provide rationalization plans based on efficiency measurement. This study is significant as it presents a strategic analytical tool to establish terminal rationalization plans at the national level and also proves its applicability. (c) 2022 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Korean Association of Shipping and Logistics, Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). CC_BY_NC_ND_4.0
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 70
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DEA cross-efficiency analysis considering competitive perspective and stakeholder
    Si Q.
    Ma Z.
    Liu Z.
    Xi Tong Gong Cheng Yu Dian Zi Ji Shu/Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42 (04): : 887 - 895
  • [2] EFFICIENCY AND CROSS-EFFICIENCY IN DEA - DERIVATIONS, MEANINGS AND USES
    DOYLE, J
    GREEN, R
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1994, 45 (05) : 567 - 578
  • [3] Evaluation techniques with a modified cross-efficiency in DEA
    Hibiki, N
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONS RESEARCH SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 1998, 41 (02) : 229 - 245
  • [4] Cross-efficiency analysis of energy sector using stochastic DEA: Considering pollutant emissions
    Hadi-Vencheh, A.
    Khodadadipour, M.
    Tan, Y.
    Arman, H.
    Roubaud, D.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 364
  • [6] A new thought on cross-efficiency evaluation in DEA
    Jiag, Hao
    Wang, Xuejun
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2007 CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS SCIENCE, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND SYSTEM DYNAMICS: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND COMPLEX SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-10, 2007, : 925 - 932
  • [7] DEA cross-efficiency aggregation based on preference structure and acceptability analysis
    Fu, Yelin
    Li, Ming
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (02) : 987 - 1011
  • [8] Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation
    Liang, Liang
    Wu, Jie
    Cook, Wade D.
    Zhu, Joe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2008, 113 (02) : 1025 - 1030
  • [9] Some alternative models for DEA cross-efficiency evaluation
    Wang, Ying-Ming
    Chin, Kwai-Sang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2010, 128 (01) : 332 - 338
  • [10] DEA Cobb-Douglas frontier and cross-efficiency
    Cook, W. D.
    Zhu, J.
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2014, 65 (02) : 265 - 268