A Cascading Bias Correction Method for Global Climate Model Simulated Multiyear Precipitation Variability

被引:1
|
作者
Frei, Allan [1 ,2 ]
Mukundan, Rajith [3 ]
Chen, Jie [4 ]
Gelda, Rakesh K. [3 ]
Owens, Emmet M. [3 ]
Gass, Jordan [3 ]
Ravindranath, Arun [2 ]
机构
[1] City Univ New York, Hunter Coll, Dept Geog & Environm Sci, New York, NY 10017 USA
[2] City Univ New York, Inst Sustainable Cities, Hunter Coll, New York, NY 10017 USA
[3] New York City Dept Environm Protect, Water Qual Modeling Sect, New York City, Kingston, Jamaica
[4] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn Sc, Wuhan, Peoples R China
关键词
Climate variability; Model evaluation; performance; Multidecadal variability; EXTREME HYDROLOGICAL EVENTS; SOURCE AREA HYDROLOGY; NEW-YORK; CHANGE IMPACT; DROUGHT; STREAMFLOW; TEMPERATURE; FREQUENCY; RUNOFF; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1175/JHM-D-21-0148.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The use of global climate model (GCM) precipitation simulations typically requires corrections for precipitation biases at subgrid spatial scales, typically at daily or monthly time scales. However, over many regions GCMs underestimate the magnitudes of multiyear precipitation extremes in the observed climate, resulting in a likely underestimation of the magnitudes of multiyear precipitation extremes in future scenarios. The objective of this study is to propose a method to extract from GCMs more realistic scenarios of multiyear precipitation extremes over time horizons of decades to one century. This proposed correction method is analogous to widely used bias correction methods, except that it is applied to variability at longer time scales than previous implementations (i.e., multiyear rather than daily or monthly). A case study of precipitation over a basin from the New York City water supply system demonstrates the potential magnitude of the underestimation of multiyear precipitation using uncorrected GCM scenarios, and the potential impact of the correction on multiyear hydrological extremes. Overall, it is a practical, conceptually simple approach meant for water supply system impact studies, but can be used for any impact studies that require more realistic multiyear extreme precipitation extreme scenarios. Significance StatementThe purpose of this study is to present a practical method to address a particular difficulty that in some regions arises in climate change impact studies: global climate models tend to underestimate the multiyear variability of precipitation over some regions, resulting in an underestimation of the magnitudes and/or intensities of prolonged droughts as well as prolonged wet periods. The method is analogous to widely used bias correction methods, except it is applied to variability at longer time scales than previous implementations (i.e., multiyear rather than daily or monthly). It is designed to provide more realistic estimates of extreme hydrological scenarios during the twenty-first century. Our particular interest is for managers of water supply systems, but the method may be of interest to others for whom multiyear precipitation extremes are critical.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 713
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of two bias correction methods for precipitation simulated with a regional climate model
    Gabriele Vanessa Tschöke
    Nadiane Smaha Kruk
    Paulo Ivo Braga de Queiroz
    Sin Chan Chou
    Wilson Cabral de Sousa Junior
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2017, 127 : 841 - 852
  • [2] Comparison of two bias correction methods for precipitation simulated with a regional climate model
    Tschoke, Gabriele Vanessa
    Kruk, Nadiane Smaha
    Braga de Queiroz, Paulo Ivo
    Chou, Sin Chan
    de Sousa Junior, Wilson Cabral
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2017, 127 (3-4) : 841 - 852
  • [3] Bias correction of daily precipitation simulated by a regional climate model: a comparison of methods
    Lafon, Thomas
    Dadson, Simon
    Buys, Gwen
    Prudhomme, Christel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2013, 33 (06) : 1367 - 1381
  • [4] Joint bias correction of temperature and precipitation in climate model simulations
    Li, Chao
    Sinha, Eva
    Horton, Daniel E.
    Diffenbaugh, Noah S.
    Michalak, Anna M.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2014, 119 (23) : 13153 - 13162
  • [5] Bias correction can modify climate model simulated precipitation changes without adverse effect on the ensemble mean
    Maurer, E. P.
    Pierce, D. W.
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2014, 18 (03) : 915 - 925
  • [6] Statistical bias correction of global simulated daily precipitation and temperature for the application of hydrological models
    Piani, C.
    Weedon, G. P.
    Best, M.
    Gomes, S. M.
    Viterbo, P.
    Hagemann, S.
    Haerter, J. O.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2010, 395 (3-4) : 199 - 215
  • [7] Precipitation by a regional climate model and bias correction in Europe and South Asia
    Dobler, Andreas
    Ahrens, Bodo
    METEOROLOGISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 2008, 17 (04) : 499 - 509
  • [8] Bias correction of global ensemble precipitation forecasts by Random Forest method
    Zarei, Morteza
    Najarchi, Mohsen
    Mastouri, Reza
    EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2021, 14 (02) : 677 - 689
  • [9] Bias correction of global ensemble precipitation forecasts by Random Forest method
    Morteza Zarei
    Mohsen Najarchi
    Reza Mastouri
    Earth Science Informatics, 2021, 14 : 677 - 689
  • [10] Bias nonstationarity of global climate model outputs: The role of internal climate variability and climate model sensitivity
    Hui, Yu
    Chen, Jie
    Xu, Chong-Yu
    Xiong, Lihua
    Chen, Hua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2019, 39 (04) : 2278 - 2294