Blocking Mechanism of Ultrafiltration and Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration Membrane for Dye Removal from Model Waste Water

被引:7
|
作者
Aryanti, Nita [1 ,2 ]
Sandria, Fatikhatul K. Ika [1 ]
Wardhani, Dyah Hesti [1 ]
机构
[1] Diponegoro Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Semarang, Indonesia
[2] Diponegoro Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Membrane Res Ctr Mer C, Semarang, Indonesia
关键词
Dye; Micellar; Pore Blocking; Surfactant; Ultrafiltration; AQUEOUS-SOLUTION; FOULING MECHANISMS; REACTIVE DYES; TECHNOLOGIES; SURFACTANTS; WASTEWATERS; FLUX;
D O I
10.1166/asl.2017.8730
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration Membrane (MEUF) is a development of ultrafiltration technology. In the MEUF, a surfactant having a concentration above its Critical Micelle Concentration is added into a solution containing small size solute. At that concentration, surfactant generates amphiphilic micelle having a diameter greater than membrane pore. The MEUF is one of promising technology to separate low molecular solute such as dye since the amphiphilic micelle will entrap the small solute. In this research, Ultrafiltration and MEUF were studied to remove reactive dyes from synthetic waste water and their membrane blocking mechanism were evaluated. Remazol dyes mixture with water were chosen as model dye-polluted waste water. The performance of both ultrafiltration and MEUF system were compared in the term of flux profile and rejection (dye concentration and Chemical Oxygen Demand). The result showed that permeate flux decline was more pronounced for the UF compared to the MEUF. Investigation of blocking mechanism was determined by using Hermia Model. It was found that the blocking mechanism for both Ultrafiltration and MEUF were dominated with Cake Formation Mechanism.
引用
收藏
页码:2598 / 2600
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Removal of dye from wastewater using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration and recovery of surfactant
    Purkait, MK
    DasGupta, S
    De, S
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 37 (01) : 81 - 92
  • [2] Removal of Nutrients from Water Using Biosurfactant Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration
    Era, Sarjana Binte Rafiq
    Mulligan, Catherine N.
    MOLECULES, 2023, 28 (04):
  • [3] Removal of phenol from synthetic waste water using Gemini micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (GMEUF)
    Zhang, Wenxiang
    Huang, Guohe
    Wei, Jia
    Li, Huiqin
    Zheng, Rubing
    Zhou, Ya
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2012, 235 : 128 - 137
  • [4] Assessment of the micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration process with a tight UF membrane for the removal of aniline from water
    Tanhaei, Bahareh
    Chenar, Mahdi Pourafshari
    Saghatoleslami, Nasser
    Hesampour, Mehrdad
    Kallioinen, Mari
    Manttari, Mika
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2014, 52 (31-33) : 5748 - 5756
  • [5] Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration with a novel modified membrane for removal of arsenate and emerging contaminants from water
    Raval, Hiren D.
    Parmar, Parth
    Raval, Kevin
    DESALINATION, 2024, 574
  • [6] Removal of arsenic from groundwater by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF)
    Iqbal, Javed
    Kim, Ho-Jeong
    Yang, Jung-Seok
    Baek, Kitae
    Yang, Ji-Won
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2007, 66 (05) : 970 - 976
  • [7] Produced Water Treatment by Micellar-Enhanced Ultrafiltration
    Deriszadeh, Ali
    Husein, Maen M.
    Harding, Thomas G.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (05) : 1767 - 1772
  • [8] Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration for simultaneous removal of ferricyanide and nitrate
    Baek, K
    Lee, HH
    Yang, JW
    DESALINATION, 2003, 158 (1-3) : 157 - 166
  • [9] Removal characteristics of anionic metals by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration
    Baek, K
    Kim, BK
    Cho, HJ
    Yang, JW
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2003, 99 (03) : 303 - 311
  • [10] Studies of membrane fouling mechanisms involved in the micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration using blocking models
    Zhang, Wenxiang
    Liang, Wenzhong
    Huang, Guohe
    Wei, Jia
    Ding, Luhui
    Jaffrin, Michel Y.
    RSC ADVANCES, 2015, 5 (60) : 48484 - 48491