Comparing the fixed combination brimonidine-timolol versus fixed combination dorzolamide-timolol in patients with elevated intraocular pressure

被引:22
|
作者
Arcieri, Enyr S.
Arcieri, Rafael S.
Pereira, Ana C. A.
Andreo, Eduardo G. V.
Finotti, Iona G. A.
Sa Filho, Wanderley F.
机构
[1] Univ Fed Uberlandia, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Glaucoma Serv, BR-38411092 Uberlandia, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, Dept Ophthalmol, Glaucoma Serv, UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[3] Santa Casa Campo Grande, Mato Grosso, Brazil
关键词
fixed combination; glaucoma; ocular hypertension; therapy;
D O I
10.1185/030079907X178694
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of fixed combination brimonidine-timolol (FCBT) versus fixed combination dorzolamide-timolol (FCDT) given twice daily in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OH). Design: Prospective, multicentre, masked-observer, crossover comparison. Participants: Sixteen patients with POAG and 14 with OH. Methods: The participants of the study were washed out from their previous medication and randomized to fixed FCBT or FCDT for the first 4-week treatment period. Subjects then were washed for 4 weeks and started on the opposite medication for the second 4-week period. Intraocular pressure (1013) was measured with a Goldmann applanation tonometer at 8:00 a.m.,12:00 noon and 4:00 p.m. at each baseline and at the end of each treatment period. Unsolicited ocular adverse events were also recorded. Main outcome measures: Comparison of the IOP lowering effect of FCBT and FCDT. Results: The baseline mean diurnal IOP for all 30 subjects (30 eyes) was 22.9 +/- 1.6 mmHg. Both fixed combinations significantly reduced IOP compared with baseline (p < 0.00001). The mean diurnal IOP following 4 weeks of therapy was 15.0 +/- 2.1 mmHg for FCBT and 15.4 +/- 2.1 mmHg for FCDT (p = 0.510). The mean diurnal IOP reduction was 7.8 +/- 1.9 mmHg for FCBT and 7.4 +/- 1.8 mmHg for FCDT (p = 0.430). Overall, 14 subjects complained about ocular adverse events: two only for FCBT seven only for FCDT and five for both drugs. Although there was no significant difference between the number of subjects that reported ocular adverse events with FCBT (n = 7) and FCDT (n =12) (p= 0.359), FCDT caused more ocular stinging upon instillation (n= 9) than FCBT (n= 1) (p= 0.027). Conclusion: This study suggests that FCBT and FCDT, each given twice daily, have similar efficacy in patients with POAG or OH.
引用
收藏
页码:683 / 689
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Control of Intraocular Pressure and Intraocular Pressure Fluctuation With Fixed Combination Brimonidine-Timolol versus Brimonidine or Timolol Monotherapy
    Spaeth, G. L.
    Caprioli, J.
    Bernstein, P.
    Schiffman, R.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [2] Fixed combinations of dorzolamide-timolol and brimonidine-timolol in the management of glaucoma
    Razeghinejad, M. Reza
    Sawchyn, Andrea K.
    Katz, L. Jay
    EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2010, 11 (06) : 959 - 968
  • [3] Control of Intraocular Pressure and Fluctuation With Fixed-Combination Brimonidine-Timolol Versus Brimonidine or Timolol Monotherapy
    Spaeth, George L.
    Bernstein, Paula
    Caprioli, Joseph
    Schiffman, Rhett M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 151 (01) : 93 - 99
  • [4] Comparison of the effects of dorzolamide-timolol fixed combination and brimonidine on intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification surgery
    Ozkurt, Yelda
    Oral, Yesim
    Karacan, Ozgul
    Comez, Arzu
    Dogan, Omer K.
    EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2008, 34 (01): : 21 - 23
  • [5] Effect of a fixed brimonidine-timolol combination on intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification
    Pharmakakis, Nikolaos
    Giannopoulos, Konstantinos
    Stasinos, Stavros
    Makri, Olga E.
    Georgakopoulos, Constantine D.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 37 (02): : 279 - 283
  • [6] Comparison of brimonidine-timolol and dorzolamide-timolol in the management of intraocular pressure increase after phacoemulsification
    Turk, Adem
    Ceylan, Osman Melih
    Gokce, Gokcen
    Borazan, Mehment
    Kola, Mehmet
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 8 (05) : 945 - 949
  • [7] Three-month, randomized, parallel-group comparison of brimonidine-timolol versus dorzolamide-timolol fixed-combination therapy
    Nixon, Donald R.
    Yan, David B.
    Chartrand, Jean-Pierre
    Piemontesi, Roberto L.
    Simonyi, Susan
    Hollander, David A.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2009, 25 (07) : 1645 - 1653
  • [8] Diurnal Intraocular Pressure Efficacy of the Timolol-Brimonidine Fixed Combination and the Timolol-Dorzolamide Fixed Combination as a First Choice Therapy in Patients with Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma
    Yuksel, Nursen
    Gok, Mustafa
    Altintas, Ozgul
    Caglar, Yusuf
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2011, 36 (09) : 804 - 808
  • [9] Dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost:: Effects on intraocular pressure and hemodynamics
    Janulevicienë, I
    Harris, A
    Kagemann, L
    Siesky, B
    McCranor, L
    ISOPT: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON OCULAR PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2004, : 225 - 230
  • [10] Fixed Combination Brimonidine-Timolol Versus Brimonidine for Treatment of Intraocular Pressure Elevation After Neodymium: YAG Laser Posterior Capsulotomy
    Oner, Veysi
    Alakus, Mehmet Fuat
    Tas, Mehmet
    Turkyilmaz, Kemal
    Iscan, Yalcin
    JOURNAL OF OCULAR PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 28 (06) : 576 - 580