Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment Including Specific Diaphragm Techniques Improves Pain and Disability in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Trial

被引:28
|
作者
Marti-Salvador, Mireia [1 ]
Hidalgo-Moreno, Laura [1 ]
Domenech-Fernandez, Julio [2 ,3 ]
Francisco Lison, Juan [2 ]
Dolores Arguisuelas, Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cardenal Herrera CEU, CEU Univ, Dept Physiotherapy, Valencia, Spain
[2] Univ Cardenal Herrera CEU, CEU Univ, Dept Med, Valencia, Spain
[3] Hosp Arnau Vilanova, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Valencia, Spain
来源
关键词
Diaphragm; Manual therapy; Rehabilitation; FEAR-AVOIDANCE BELIEFS; SPANISH VERSION; MYOFASCIAL RELEASE; DEPRESSION SCALE; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; MANUAL TREATMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; THERAPY; VALIDATION; FIBROMYALGIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2018.04.022
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the effects of an osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT), which includes a diaphragm intervention compared to the same OMT with a sham diaphragm intervention in chronic nonspecific low back pain (NS-CLBP). Design: Parallel group randomized controlled trial. Setting: Private and institutional health centers. Participants: Participants (N=66) (18-60y) with a diagnosis of NS-CLBP lasting at least 3 months. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive either an OMT protocol including specific diaphragm techniques (n=33) or the same OMT protocol with a sham diaphragm intervention (n = 33), conducted in 5 sessions provided during 4 weeks. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes were pain (evaluated with the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire [SF-MPQ] and the visual analog scale [VAS]) and disability (assessed with the Roland-Morris Questionnaire [RMQ] and the Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]). Secondary outcomes were fear-avoidance beliefs, level of anxiety and depression, and pain catastrophization. All outcome measures were evaluated at baseline, at week 4, and at week 12. Results: A statistically significant reduction was observed in the experimental group compared to the sham group in all variables assessed at week 4 and at week 12 (SF-MPQ [mean difference -6.2; 95% confidence interval, -8.6 to -3.8]; VAS [mean difference -2.7; 95% confidence interval, -3.6 to -1.8]; RMQ [mean difference -3.8; 95% confidence interval, -5.4 to -2.2]; ODI [mean difference -10.6; 95% confidence interval, -14.9 to 6.3]). Moreover, improvements in pain and disability were clinically relevant. Conclusions: An OMT protocol that includes diaphragm techniques produces significant and clinically relevant improvements in pain and disability in patients with NS-CLBP compared to the same OMT protocol using sham diaphragm techniques. (C) 2018 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:1720 / 1729
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Osteopathic manipulative treatment for chronic low back pain - A randomized controlled trial
    Licciardone, JC
    Stoll, ST
    Fulda, KG
    Russo, DP
    Siu, J
    Winn, W
    Swift, J
    SPINE, 2003, 28 (13) : 1355 - 1362
  • [2] Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment Is Effective for Nonspecific Low Back Pain
    Rosendahl, Nicolette O'Donnell
    Seffinger, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION, 2015, 115 (01): : 51 - 52
  • [3] The effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment on pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Popovich, John M.
    Cholewicki, Jacek
    Reeves, N. Peter
    Destefano, Lisa A.
    Rowan, Jacob J.
    Francisco, Timothy J.
    Prokop, Lawrence L.
    Zatkin, Mathew A.
    Lee, Angela S.
    Sikorskii, Alla
    Pathak, Pramod K.
    Choi, Jongeun
    Radcliffe, Clark J.
    Ramadan, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE, 2024, 124 (05): : 219 - 230
  • [4] Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain
    Quesnay, Paul
    Md, Johann Cailhol
    Falgarone, Geraldine
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 181 (08) : 1143 - 1143
  • [5] Recovery From Chronic Low Back Pain After Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Licciardone, John C.
    Gatchel, Robert J.
    Aryal, Subhash
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION, 2016, 116 (03): : 144 - 155
  • [6] Osteopathic manipulative treatment combined with exercise improves pain and disability in individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial
    Groisman, Sandro
    Malysz, Tais
    da Silva, Luciano de Souza
    Ribeiro Sanches, Tamara Rocha
    Bragante, Karoline Camargo
    Locatelli, Franciele
    Vigolo, Cleder Pontel
    Vaccari, Simone
    Rosa Francisco, Cristina Homercher
    Steigleder, Simone Monteiro
    Jotz, Geraldo Pereira
    JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2020, 24 (02) : 189 - 195
  • [7] Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment for Low Back Pain
    Ponna, Vimala
    Talsma, Joel
    Pierce-Talsma, Stacey
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION, 2020, 120 (06): : E84 - E85
  • [8] Effect of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment vs Sham Treatment on Activity Limitations in Patients With Nonspecific Subacute and Chronic Low Back Pain A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Nguyen, Christelle
    Boutron, Isabelle
    Zegarra-Parodi, Rafael
    Baron, Gabriel
    Alami, Sophie
    Sanchez, Katherine
    Daste, Camille
    Boisson, Margaux
    Fabre, Laurent
    Krief, Peggy
    Krief, Guillaume
    Lefevre-Colau, Marie-Martine
    Rannou, Francois
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 181 (05) : 620 - 630
  • [9] Osteopathic Manipulative Therapy in Women With Postpartum Low Back Pain and Disability: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
    Schwerla, Florian
    Rother, Katrin
    Rother, Denis
    Ruetz, Michaela
    Resch, Karl-Ludwig
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION, 2015, 115 (07): : 416 - 425