Do geopolitical events transmit opportunity or threat to green markets? Decomposed measures of geopolitical risks

被引:101
|
作者
Sohag, Kazi [1 ]
Hammoudeh, Shawkat [2 ,3 ]
Elsayed, Ahmed H. [4 ,5 ]
Mariev, Oleg [1 ]
Safonova, Yulia [1 ]
机构
[1] Ural Fed Univ, Grad Sch Econ & Management, Ekaterinburg, Russia
[2] Drexel Univ, Lebow Coll Business, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Univ Econ HCMC, Bur Int Business, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
[4] Univ Durham, Dept Econ & Finance, Durham, England
[5] Zagazig Univ, Fac Commerce, Dept Econ, Zagazig, Egypt
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
Green equity; Green bonds; Geopolitical risks; Cross-quantilogram; OIL RETURNS; STOCK-PRICES; VOLATILITY; WAR; UNCERTAINTY; TERRORISM; DYNAMICS; IMPACT; PREDICTABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106068
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The growth of clean energies and technologies requires a sound financial market, while equity and bond markets are exposed to geopolitical risks. We investigate the response of green equity and green bonds to newly develop decomposed measures of geopolitical risks, including geopolitical acts, threats, and narrow and broad measures. To this end, we apply two robust methods; namely, the cross-quantilogram and quantile and quantile (QQ) approaches, to estimate the conditional and unconditional volatility spillovers considering short, medium, and long term. Surprisingly our empirical investigation demonstrates that all measures of geopolitical risk (except geopolitical acts) transmit positive shocks to the green investments (both equity and bonds) from bearish to bullish market states. At the bullish state, green markets respond negatively to the highest quantiles of all measures of geopolitical risks under a long memory. However, the geopolitical acts negatively shock the green bonds and green equity at some extreme quantiles. Our empirical findings are beneficial by transmitting opportunities and preventing risks for investment decision-making in the green markets, considering geopolitical risks.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The role of geopolitical risks on the Turkish economy opportunity or threat
    Mansour-Ichrakieh, Layal
    Zeaiter, Hussein
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2019, 50
  • [2] Geopolitical risk: An opportunity or a threat to the green bond market?
    Liu, Fangying
    Qin, Chuan
    Qin, Meng
    Stefea, Petru
    Norena-Chavez, Diego
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2024, 131
  • [3] Asymmetric effects of geopolitical risks and uncertainties on green bond markets
    Tang, Yumei
    Chen, Xihui Haviour
    Sarker, Provash Kumer
    Baroudi, Sarra
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2023, 189
  • [4] Do geopolitical uncertainty and inflation transmit opportunities or threats to green energy consumption?
    Mishra, Amritkant
    Sahu, Pritish Kumar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [5] Can Bitcoin hedge the risks of geopolitical events?
    Su, Chi-Wei
    Qin, Meng
    Tao, Ran
    Shao, Xue-Feng
    Albu, Lucian Liviu
    Umar, Muhammad
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2020, 159 (159)
  • [6] Do geopolitical risks matter for inbound tourism?
    Ender Demir
    Giray Gozgor
    Sudharshan Reddy Paramati
    Eurasian Business Review, 2019, 9 : 183 - 191
  • [7] Exploring the connection between geopolitical risks and energy markets
    Almeida, Dora
    Ferreira, Paulo
    Dionisio, Andreia
    Aslam, Faheem
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2025, 141
  • [8] Do geopolitical risks matter for inbound tourism?
    Demir, Ender
    Gozgor, Giray
    Paramati, Sudharshan Reddy
    EURASIAN BUSINESS REVIEW, 2019, 9 (02) : 183 - 191
  • [9] Strategic insights into carbon markets, digital finance and geopolitical risks for advancing green sustainability investments
    Mnif, Emna
    Jarboui, Anis
    Mouakhar, Khaireddine
    MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2024, 35 (07) : 1622 - 1649
  • [10] Geopolitical Risks and Movements in Islamic Bond and Equity Markets: A Note
    Bouri, Elie
    Demirer, Riza
    Gupta, Rangan
    Marfatia, Hardik A.
    DEFENCE AND PEACE ECONOMICS, 2019, 30 (03) : 367 - 379