Comparison of three semen extenders: tris egg yolk, EQUEX® and LDL (low density lipoproteins) in canine sperm cryopreservation

被引:0
|
作者
Bencharif, D. [1 ]
Amirat-Briand, L. [1 ]
Garand, A. [1 ]
Anton, M. [2 ]
Schmitt, E. [3 ]
Desherces, S. [3 ]
Delhomme, G. [3 ]
Langlois, M. L. [4 ]
Barriere, P. [4 ]
Destrumelle, S. [1 ]
Vera-Munoz, O. [1 ]
Tainturier, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Natl Vet Agroalimentaire & Alimentat, Lab Biotechnol & Pathol Reprod, F-44307 Nantes, France
[2] INRA, Biopolymeres Interact Assemblages UR1268, Equipe Interfaces & Syst Disperses, F-44316 Nantes 3, France
[3] IMV Technol, F-61302 Aigle, France
[4] CHU Hotel Dieux, Dept Reprod Pathol, F-44093 Nantes 1, France
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 78
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Freezing canine sperm: Comparison of semen extenders containing Equex® and LDL (Low Density Lipoproteins)
    Bencharif, Djemil
    Amirat-Briand, Lamia
    Garand, Annabelle
    Anton, Marc
    Schmitt, Eric
    Desherces, Serge
    Delhomme, Guy
    Langlois, Marie-Laure
    Barriere, Paul
    Destrumelle, Sandrine
    Vera-Munoz, Oscar
    Tainturier, Daniel
    ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2010, 119 (3-4) : 305 - 313
  • [2] The advantages of using a combination of LDL and glutamine in comparison with TRIS egg yolk and Equex® STAMP extenders in the cryopreservation of canine semen
    Bencharif, Djemil
    Amirat-Briand, Lamia
    Garand, Annabelle
    Anton, Marc
    Schmitt, Eric
    Desherces, Serge
    Delhomme, Guy
    Langlois, Marie-Laure
    Barriere, Paul
    Destrumelle, Sandrine
    Vera-Munoz, Oscar
    Tainturier, Daniel
    RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2012, 93 (01) : 440 - 447
  • [3] Comparison of diluents supplemented with egg yolk or LDL for the Cryopreservation of canine semen
    Bencharif, D.
    Tainturier, D.
    Amirat, L.
    Barriere, J. P.
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2006, 41 (04) : 316 - 316
  • [4] The advantages of LDL (Low Density Lipoproteins) in the cryopreservation of canine semen
    Bencharif, D.
    Amirat, L.
    Anton, M.
    Schmitt, E.
    Desherces, S.
    Delhomme, G.
    Langlois, M. -L.
    Barriere, P.
    Larrat, M.
    Tainturier, D.
    THERIOGENOLOGY, 2008, 70 (09) : 1478 - 1488
  • [5] Comparing ethylene glycol with glycerol for cryopreservation of canine semen in egg-yolk TRIS extenders
    Martins-Bessa, Ana
    Rocha, Antonio
    Mayenco-Aguirre, A.
    THERIOGENOLOGY, 2006, 66 (09) : 2047 - 2055
  • [6] Are artificial insemination centres ready to replace egg yolk by low density lipoproteins (LDL) in extenders for bull semen cryopreservation? : recent results review
    Amirat-Briand, L.
    Bencharif, D.
    Vera-Munoz, O.
    Anton, M.
    Schmidt, E.
    Desherces, S.
    Tainturier, D.
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2010, 45 : 75 - 75
  • [7] Comparison of TRIS-egg yolk and OPTIXcell® extender for cryopreservation of canine sperm
    Fleisch, A.
    Malama, E.
    Bollwein, H.
    Janett, F.
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2015, 50 : 31 - 32
  • [8] Refrigeration of canine sperm at+4°C: Comparative study of four different extenders for the refrigeration of canine sperm at+4°C: LDL, Tris egg yolk, Equex®, and INRA96®
    Bencharif, D.
    Amirat-Briand, L.
    Le Guillou, J.
    Vialtelle, C.
    Anton, M.
    Schmitt, E.
    Desherces, S.
    Barriere, P.
    Tainturier, D.
    REVUE DE MEDECINE VETERINAIRE, 2013, 164 (05) : 252 - 262
  • [9] Cryopreservation of canine sperm using egg yolk and soy bean based extenders
    Jesus Sanchez-Calabuig, Maria
    Maillo, Veronica
    Beltran-Brena, Paula
    de la Fuente Martinez, Julio
    Calera-Carrillo, Silvestre
    Felix Perez-Gutierrez, Jose
    Perez-Cerezales, Serafin
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 17 (03) : 233 - 238
  • [10] IN VITRO ASSESSMENT OF TRIS EGG YOLK AND SOYBEAN LECITHIN BASED EXTENDERS FOR CRYOPRESERVATION OF CROSSBRED RAM SEMEN
    Khatun, Arjuma
    Fazili, M. R.
    Malik, A. A.
    Shah, R. A.
    Khan, H. M.
    Choudhury, A. R.
    Naikoo, M.
    Lone, F. A.
    Malik, Abrar
    CRYOLETTERS, 2021, 42 (02) : 73 - 80