Opening Up the Participation Laboratory: The Cocreation of Publics and Futures in Upstream Participation

被引:39
|
作者
Krzywoszynska, Anna [1 ]
Matt, Watson [2 ]
Buckley, Alastair [3 ]
Chiles, Prue [4 ]
Gregson, Nicky [5 ]
Holmes, Helen [6 ]
Mawyin, Jose [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dep Geog, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Sheffield, Phys, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham, Notts, England
[5] Univ Durham, Human Geog, Durham, England
[6] Univ Manchester, Manchester, Lancs, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
upstream public engagement; invited participation; public participation; futures; energy futures; ENGAGEMENT; NANOTECHNOLOGY; CITIZENS; CRITIQUE; RISK;
D O I
10.1177/0162243917752865
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
How to embed reflexivity in public participation in techno-science and to open it up to the agency of publics are key concerns in current debates. There is a risk that engagements become limited to laboratory experiments, highly controlled and foreclosed by participation experts, particularly in upstream techno-sciences. In this paper, we propose a way to open up the participation laboratory by engaging localized, self-assembling publics in ways that respect and mobilize their ecologies of participation. Our innovative reflexive methodology introduced participatory methods to public engagement with upstream techno-science, with the public contributing to both the content and format of the project. Reflecting on the project, we draw attention to the largely overlooked issue of temporalities of participation, and the co-production of futures and publics in participation methodologies. We argue that many public participation methodologies are underpinned by the open futures model, which imagines the future as a space of unrestrained creativity. We contrast that model with the lived futures model typical of localized publics, which respects latency of materials and processes but imposes limits on creativity. We argue that to continue being societally relevant and scientifically important, public participation methods should reconcile the open future of research with the lived futures of localized publics.
引用
收藏
页码:785 / 809
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条