Screening CO2 storage options in The Netherlands

被引:64
|
作者
Ramirez, Andrea [1 ]
Hagedoorn, Saskia [2 ]
Kramers, Leslie [3 ]
Wildenborg, Ton [3 ]
Hendriks, Chris [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst, Grp Sci Technol & Soc, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Ecofys Netherlands BV, NL-3503 RK Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] TNO Built Environm & Geosci, NL-3508 TA Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
CO2; storage; Screening; Costs; Risks; SITE SELECTION; SAFETY; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.10.015
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper describes the development and application of a methodology to screen and rank Dutch reservoirs suitable for long-term large scale CO2 storage The screening focuses on off- and on-shore individual aquifers. gas and oil fields In total 176 storage reservoirs have been taken into consideration 138 gas fields, 4 oil fields and 34 aquifers, with a total theoretical storage potential of about 3200 Mt CO2 The reservoirs are screened according to three criteria potential storage capacity, storage costs and effort needed to manage risk Due to the large number of reservoirs, which limits the possibility to use any pair-wise comparison method (e g Multi-Criteria programs such as Bosda or Naiade), a spreadsheet tool was designed to provide an assessment of each of the criteria through an evaluation of the fields present in the database and a set of scores provided by a (inter)national panel of experts The assessment is sufficiently simple and allows others to review it, re-do it or expand it The results of the methodology show that plausible comparisons of prospective sites with limited characterization data are possible (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 380
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Screening CO2 storage options in the Netherlands
    Ramirez, Andrea
    Hagedoorn, Saskia
    Kramers, Leslie
    Wildenborg, Ton
    Hendriks, Chris
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9, 2009, 1 (01): : 2801 - 2808
  • [2] Offshore storage options for CO2 in the Netherlands
    Neele, Filip
    Hofstee, Cor
    Arts, Rob
    Vandeweijer, Vincent
    Nepveu, Manuel
    ten Veen, Johan
    Wilschut, Frank
    GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 5220 - 5229
  • [3] Informed public opinion in the Netherlands: Evaluation of CO2 capture and storage technologies in comparison with other CO2 mitigation options
    de Best-Waldhober, Marjolein
    Daamen, Dancker
    Ramirez, Andrea Ramirez
    Faaij, Andre
    Hendriks, Chris
    de Visser, Erika
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2012, 10 : 169 - 180
  • [4] Potential for geological storage of CO2 in the Netherlands
    Schreurs, HCE
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 303 - 308
  • [5] Direct ocean storage of CO2: Options and obstacles
    Haugan, PM
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH (1997) INTERNATIONAL OFFSHORE AND POLAR ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL I, 1997, 1997, : 499 - 504
  • [6] CO2 STORAGE OPTIONS IN THE DEEP-SEA
    OHSUMI, T
    MARINE TECHNOLOGY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 1995, 29 (03) : 58 - 66
  • [7] STORAGE RESTRICTIONS AND THE PREFERENCE FOR CO2 REMOVAL OPTIONS
    OKKEN, PA
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1993, 34 (9-11) : 823 - 831
  • [8] Introduction on CO2 geological storage.: Classification of storage options
    Lokhorst, A
    Wildenborg, I
    OIL & GAS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-REVUE D IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES, 2005, 60 (03): : 513 - 515
  • [9] Screening criteria for CO2 storage in oil reservoirs
    Kovscek, AR
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 20 (7-8) : 841 - 866
  • [10] Evaluation of geologic storage options of CO2: Applicability, cost, storage capacity and safety
    Aydin, Gokhan
    Karakurt, Izzet
    Aydiner, Kerim
    ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (09) : 5072 - 5080