MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING VS. TRANSVAGINAL ULTRASOUND FOR CERVICAL LENGTH ASSESSMENT IN THE SECOND HALF OF PREGNANCY

被引:3
|
作者
Brandao, Rosieny Souza [1 ]
Pires, Claudio Rodrigues [1 ]
de Souza, Eduardo [1 ]
Avanza, Leonardo Luiz [1 ]
Mattar, Rosiane [1 ]
Araujo Junior, Edward [1 ]
Marcondes, Luciano [1 ]
Nardozza, Machado [1 ]
Moron, Antonio Fernandes [1 ]
机构
[1] Sao Paulo Fed Univ UNIFESP, Dept Obstet, BR-01250010 Sao Paulo, Brazil
来源
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2010年 / 36卷 / 04期
关键词
Pregnancy; Cervix; Transvaginal sonography; Magnetic resonance imaging; GESTATIONAL-AGE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.12.002
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this cross-sectional study involving 42 women between 20 and 39 weeks gestation was to compare transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) vs. magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessment of cervical length measurement during the second half of pregnancy and to evaluate the reproducibility of cervical measurements obtained through MRI. Cervical length was measured through TVUS by a single examiner. On the same day, all women also had MRI and cervical length was assessed by two independent blinded observers. There were no significant differences in the mean cervical length obtained through TVUS and MRI (paired t-test, p = 0.191). The Bland-Altman test indicated concordance between measurements obtained through methods as well as good intra- and interobserver reproducibility for MRI measurements. Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.990 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.982 to 0.995; p < 0.001) for measurements performed using MRI by two different observers and 0.995 (95% CI: 0.991 to 0.997; p < 0.001) for measurements performed using the same method by a single operator. Cervical length measured through TVUS and MRI does not differ significantly. There is a good reproducibility of cervical measurements obtained through MRI. (E-mail: crpires@ uol.com.br) (C) 2010 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 575
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transvaginal Ultrasound vs. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Value in Endometriosis Diagnosis
    Bausic, Alexandra
    Coroleuca, Ciprian
    Coroleuca, Catalin
    Comandasu, Diana
    Matasariu, Roxana
    Manu, Andrei
    Frincu, Francesca
    Mehedintu, Claudia
    Bratila, Elvira
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (07)
  • [2] Transvaginal Ultrasound vs. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: What Is the Optimal Imaging Modality for the Diagnosis of Endometriosis?
    Bausic, Alexandra Irma Gabriela
    Matasariu, Daniela Roxana
    Manu, Andrei
    Bratila, Elvira
    BIOMEDICINES, 2023, 11 (10)
  • [3] Ultrasound examination vs. magnetic resonance imaging in lymphedema
    Guvener, Orhan
    Ricci, Vincenzo
    Ozcakar, Levent
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2022, 82 : 139 - 140
  • [4] Ultrasound examination vs. magnetic resonance imaging in lymphedema
    Guvener, Orhan
    Ricci, Vincenzo
    Ozcakar, Levent
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2022, 82 : 139 - 140
  • [5] Assessment of Transvaginal Ultrasound Cervical Length Image Quality
    Penick, Emily R.
    Kliethermes, Chris
    Grimstad, Frances
    Chescheir, Nancy C.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 (03): : 578 - 579
  • [6] Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cervical Ectopic Pregnancy in the Second Trimester
    Le, Thang
    Poder, Liina
    Deans, Abby
    Joe, Bonnie N.
    Laros, Russell K., Jr.
    Coakley, Fergus V.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2012, 36 (02) : 249 - 252
  • [7] ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT OF CERVICAL LENGTH IN PREGNANCY
    Chao, An-Shine
    Chao, Angel
    Hsieh, Peter Ching-Chang
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 47 (03): : 291 - 295
  • [8] Interobserver agreement of transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in local staging of cervical cancer
    Palsdottir, K.
    Fridsten, S.
    Blomqvist, L.
    Alagic, Z.
    Fischerova, D.
    Gaurilcikas, A.
    Hasselrot, K.
    Jaderling, F.
    Testa, A. C.
    Sundin, A.
    Epstein, E.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 58 (05) : 773 - 779
  • [9] Adherence to criteria for transvaginal ultrasound imaging and measurement of cervical length
    Iams, Jay D.
    Grobman, William A.
    Lozitska, Albina
    Spong, Catherine Y.
    Saade, George
    Mercer, Brian M.
    Tita, Alan T.
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Sorokin, Yoram
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Leveno, Kenneth J.
    Blackwell, Sean C.
    Esplin, M. Sean
    Tolosa, Jorge E.
    Thorp, John M.
    Caritis, Steve N.
    Van Dorsten, Peter J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 209 (04) : 365.e1 - 365.e5
  • [10] Cervical length assessment in twin pregnancies using transvaginal ultrasound
    Ong, S
    Smith, A
    Smith, N
    Campbell, D
    Wilson, A
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2000, 79 (10) : 851 - 853