Urinary stress incontinence after radical prostatectomy in treatment reality Results of a rehabilitation clinic-2009 compared to 2016

Purpose Based on the work of Lent et al., the aim of this study was to compare and to evaluate the 2009 outcomes of maintaining continence after radical prostatectomy (rp) with those of patients from 2016. Patients and methods The data of all patients who underwent follow-up treatment 1 to 8 weeks after rp in 2016 (n = 1392) were evaluated by quantitative measuring all day incontinence under a defined graduation and compared to the results of 2009 (n = 1750). Results The basic data of the patients including age (p < 0.001), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value (median 10.8/13.76 ng/ml in 2009/2016), cancer stage (p = 0.001) and Gleason score (p = 0.001) were significantly higher in 2016. Robot-assisted prostatectomy (RARP; 12% in 2009 to 45% in 2016) was performed much more often than radical retropubic prostatectomy. Laparoscopic and perineal prostatectomy were rarely performed. Significantly fewer patients achieved pad-free continence at discharge in 2016 (23%) vs. 33.9% in 2009; p <= 0.001. Within the same age group, there was a significant worsening of continence (p = 0.01). The results of maintaining continence did not significantly differ between patients with open retropubic prostatectomy and RARP (p = 0.078). The certification type of a clinic had no effect on continence preservation (p = 0.12). Conclusion Incontinence rates after discharge from a rehabilitation clinic are high and have not improved over time or with new surgical techniques. The patient should be prepared for this in the patient information discussion prior to the surgery.