The 2018 Revision to the Process of Care Model for Evaluation of Erectile Dysfunction

被引:27
|
作者
Mulhall, John P. [1 ]
Giraldi, Annamaria [2 ]
Hackett, Geoff [3 ]
Hellstrom, Wayne J. G. [4 ]
Jannini, Emmanuele A. [5 ]
Rubio-Aurioles, Eusebio [6 ]
Trost, Landon [7 ]
Hassan, Tarek A. [8 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Sexol Clin, Psychiat Ctr Copenhagen, Dept Clin Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Aston Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
[4] Tulane Univ, Med Ctr, New Orleans, LA USA
[5] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Endocrinol & Med Sexol ENDOSEX, Dept Syst Med, Rome, Italy
[6] Asociac Mexicana Salud Sexual AC AMSSAC, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[7] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[8] Pfizer Inc, New York, NY USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE | 2018年 / 15卷 / 09期
关键词
Erectile Dysfunction; Diabetes; Cardio-Vascular Disease; Depression; Hypertension; 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONSULTATION; ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; PEAK SYSTOLIC VELOCITY; SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION; RISK-FACTORS; CONSENSUS STATEMENT; CANNABIS USE; MEN; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.06.005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common condition that may affect men of all ages; in 1999, a Process of Care Model was developed to provide clinicians with recommendations regarding the evaluation and management of ED. Aim: To reflect the evolution of the study of ED since 1999, this update to the process of care model presents health care providers with a tool kit to facilitate patient interactions, comprehensive evaluation, and counseling for ED. Methods: A cross-disciplinary panel of international experts met to propose updates to the 1999 process of care model from a global perspective. The updated model was designed to be evidence-based, data-driven, and accessible to a wide range of health care providers. Outcomes: This article summarizes the resulting discussion of the expert meeting and focuses on ED evaluation. The management of ED is discussed in an article by Muhall et al (J Sex Med 2018; 15: 1280-1292). Results: A comprehensive approach to the evaluation of ED is warranted because ED may involve both psychological and organic components. The updated process of care model for evaluation was divided into core and optional components and now focuses on the combination of first-line pharmacotherapy and counseling in consideration of patient sexual dynamics. Clinical Implications: Patient evaluation for ED should encompass a variety of aspects, including medical history, sexual history, physical examination, psychological evaluation, laboratory testing, and possibly adjunctive testing. Strengths & Limitations: This update draws on author expertise and experience to provide multi-faceted guidance for the evaluation of ED in a modern context. Although a limited number of contributors provided input on the update, these experts represent diverse fields that encounter patients with ED. Additionally, no meta-analyses were performed to further support the ED evaluation guidelines presented. Conclusion: Comprehensive evaluation of ED affords health care providers an opportunity to address medical, psychological/psycho-social, and sexual issues associated with ED, with the ultimate goal being effective management and possibly resolution of ED. While some or all techniques described in the updated model may be needed for each patient, evaluation should in all cases be thorough. Copyright (C) 2018, International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1280 / 1292
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The 2018 Revision to the Process of Care Model for Management of Erectile Dysfunction
    Mulhall, John P.
    Giraldi, Annamaria
    Hackett, Geoff
    Hellstrom, Wayne J. G.
    Jannini, Emmanuele A.
    Rubio-Aurioles, Eusebio
    Trost, Landon
    Hassan, Tarek A.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2018, 15 (10): : 1434 - 1445
  • [2] The process of care model for evaluation and treatment of erectile dysfunction
    RC Rosen
    International Journal of Impotence Research, 1999, 11 : 59 - 70
  • [3] The process of care model for evaluation and treatment of erectile dysfunction
    Rosen, R
    Goldstein, I
    Heiman, J
    Korenman, S
    Lakin, M
    Lue, T
    Montague, DK
    Padma-Nathan, H
    Segraves, RT
    Shabsigh, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH, 1999, 11 (02) : 59 - 70
  • [4] The process of care model for evaluation and treatment of erectile dysfunction - Comments
    Meuleman, E
    Feng, YP
    Giuliano, F
    Glina, S
    Sohn, MHH
    Porst, H
    Sarramon, JP
    Vermeulen, A
    Pryor, JP
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH, 1999, 11 (02) : 70 - 74
  • [6] Diagnostic and treatment strategies for erectile dysfunction: the 'Process of Care' model
    Padma-Nathan, H
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH, 2000, 12 (Suppl 4) : S119 - S121
  • [7] Diagnostic and treatment strategies for erectile dysfunction: the ‘Process of Care’ model
    H Padma-Nathan
    International Journal of Impotence Research, 2000, 12 : S119 - S121
  • [8] Evaluation of care given to patients suffering from erectile dysfunction by French urologists in 2018
    Gas, J.
    Sleinnan, W.
    Borgogno, C.
    Elmokdad, M.
    Abdessater, M.
    Faix, A.
    Coloby, P.
    Bart, S.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2020, 30 (06): : 318 - 321
  • [9] EVALUATION OF ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION MANAGEMENT IN PRIMARY CARE
    Morton, S.
    Jones, C.
    Fraser, M.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2015, 12 : 240 - 240
  • [10] THE EVALUATION OF ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION
    MELMAN, A
    UROLOGIC RADIOLOGY, 1988, 10 (03) : 119 - 128