Supply quality management with wholesale price and revenue-sharing contracts under horizontal competition

被引:126
|
作者
El Ouardighi, Fouad [1 ]
Kim, Bowon [2 ]
机构
[1] ESSEC Business Sch, F-95021 Cergy Pontoise, France
[2] KAIST Grad Sch Management, Seoul 130722, South Korea
关键词
Design quality; Supply quality management; Horizontal competition; Wholesale price contract; Revenue sharing contract; COORDINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2010.02.035
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In a number of industries (e.g., the airplane industry, aerospace industry, auto industry, or computer industry), certain suppliers essentially have a monopoly on the production technology for key components, and inevitably manufacturers in these industries have common suppliers. A key part of manufacturers' work with suppliers concerns improving the quality of their respective products, which gives rise to a collaborative activity usually termed as "supply quality management". When the manufacturers are competitors, they do not wish to see a common supplier dividing his involvement in quality improvement unequally between themselves and their rivals. However, as the suppliers collaborate with several manufacturers, it is highly questionable whether their efforts will be strictly equivalent for each manufacturer. In this paper, a non-cooperative dynamic game is formulated in which a single supplier collaborates with two manufacturers on design quality improvements for their respective products. The manufacturers compete for market demand both on price and design quality. The paper analyzes how each party should allocate resources for quality improvement over time. In order to take into account the potential coordinating power of the compensation scheme adopted in this type of decentralized setting, we compare the possible outcomes under a wholesale price contract and a revenue-sharing contract. (C) 2010 Elsevier By. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 340
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Revenue-Sharing Contracts Under Quality Uncertainty in Remanufacturing
    Vedantam, Aditya
    Iyer, Ananth
    PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2021, 30 (07) : 2008 - 2026
  • [2] Supply quality management with optimal wholesale price and revenue sharing contracts: A two-stage game approach
    El Ouardighi, Fouad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2014, 156 : 260 - 268
  • [3] Revenue sharing contracts for horizontal capacity sharing under competition
    Qin, Juanjuan
    Wang, Kun
    Wang, Ziping
    Xia, Liangjie
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2020, 291 (1-2) : 731 - 760
  • [4] Revenue sharing contracts for horizontal capacity sharing under competition
    Juanjuan Qin
    Kun Wang
    Ziping Wang
    Liangjie Xia
    Annals of Operations Research, 2020, 291 : 731 - 760
  • [5] Coordination and competition in a common retailer channel: Wholesale price versus revenue-sharing mechanisms
    Chakraborty, Tulika
    Chauhan, Satyaveer S.
    Vidyarthi, Navneet
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2015, 166 : 103 - 118
  • [6] On the role of revenue-sharing contracts in supply chains
    Krishnan, Harish
    Winter, Ralph A.
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 39 (01) : 28 - 31
  • [7] Revenue-sharing vs. wholesale-price contracts in assembly systems with random demand
    Gerchak, Y
    Wang, YZ
    PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2004, 13 (01) : 23 - 33
  • [8] Pareto and Kaldor-Hicks improvements with revenue-sharing and wholesale-price contracts under manufacturer rebate policy
    Hou, Xiyang
    Li, Jianbin
    Liu, Zhixin
    Guo, Yongjiang
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 298 (01) : 152 - 168
  • [9] Revenue-sharing versus wholesale price mechanisms under different channel power structures
    Pan, Kewen
    Lai, K. K.
    Leung, Stephen C. H.
    Xiao, Di
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 203 (02) : 532 - 538
  • [10] Revenue-sharing contracts across an extended supply chain
    van der Rhee, Bo
    Schmidt, Glen
    van der Veen, Jack A. A.
    Venugopal, V.
    BUSINESS HORIZONS, 2014, 57 (04) : 473 - 482