The Safety and Efficacy of Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Adjacent Segment Disease in a Cohort of 44 Patients

被引:8
|
作者
Screven, Ryan [1 ]
Pressman, Elliot [1 ]
Rao, Gautam [1 ]
Freeman, Thomas B. [1 ]
Alikhani, Puya [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Neurosurg & Brain Repair, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
关键词
Adjacent segment disease; Lateral lumbar interbody fusion; Minimally invasive; Revision; Spine; MAJOR VASCULAR INJURY; SPINAL-FUSION; UNITED-STATES; RISK-FACTORS; BLOOD-LOSS; SURGERY; DEGENERATION; PREVALENCE; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2021.02.046
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
-BACKGROUND: A mainstay of treatment for symptom-atic adjacent segment disease (ASD) has consisted of revision with posterior decompression and fusion. This carries significant morbidity and can be technically difficult. An alternative is stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), which may avoid complications associated with revision surgery. We describe the largest cohort of patients treated with LLIF for ASD to our knowledge. -METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on all patients who underwent transpsoas LLIF for ASD at a single academic center between 2012 and 2019. Post-operative improvement was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). -RESULTS: Forty-four patients who underwent LLIF for ASD were identified. Median age was 65 years. Median time from index surgery to ASD development was 78 months. Median levels fused via LLIF was 1. Our median follow-up was 358 days. At follow-up, the median VAS back pain score was 0 (mean, 0.884), median VAS leg pain score was 1 (mean, 0.953), and median ODI was 8. The median improvement for VAS back pain was 8, for VAS leg pain was 6, and for ODI was 40. No patients suffered new neurologic symptoms postoperatively. Of the 17 patients who initially presented with non-pain neurologic symp-toms, 8 (47.1%) experienced complete resolution of symp-toms, and 5 (29.4%) experienced only some improvement. -CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the largest cohort study of patients to date evaluating stand-alone LLIF for ASD. Our patient outcomes show it is safe and effective with low risk of morbidity.
引用
收藏
页码:E225 / E230
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biomechanical Analysis of Stand-alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Adjacent Segment Disease
    Chioffe, Michael
    McCarthy, Michael
    Swiatek, Peter R.
    Maslak, Joseph P.
    Voronov, Leonard I.
    Havey, Robert M.
    Muriuki, Muturi
    Patwardhan, Avinash
    Patel, Alpesh A.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (11)
  • [2] Incidence of adjacent-segment surgery following stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Nayar, Gautam
    Roy, Souvik
    Lutfi, Waseem
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Alan, Nima
    Ozpinar, Alp
    Hamilton, Kojo
    Okonkwo, David O.
    Kanter, Adam S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2021, 35 (03) : 270 - 274
  • [3] Stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration following previous lumbar fusion
    Louie, Philip K.
    Varthi, Arya G.
    Narain, Ankur S.
    Lei, Victor
    Bohl, Daniel D.
    Shifflett, Grant D.
    Phillips, Frank M.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (11): : 2025 - 2032
  • [4] Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using a Stand-Alone Construct for the Treatment of Adjacent-Segment Lumbar Degenerative Disease
    Kai, Wang
    Cheng, Cheng
    Yao, Qingyu
    Zhang, Can
    Jian, Fengzeng
    Wu, Hao
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [5] Reasons for revision following stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion
    Nguyen, Austin Q.
    Harvey, Jackson P.
    Khanna, Krishn
    Basques, Bryce A.
    Harada, Garrett K.
    Phillips, Frank M.
    Singh, Kern
    Dewald, Christopher
    An, Howard S.
    Colman, Matthew W.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2021, 35 (01) : 60 - 66
  • [6] Comparing stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion with posterior lumbar interbody fusion for revision of rostral adjacent segment disease A STROBE-compliant study
    Zhu, Guangduo
    Hao, Yingjie
    Yu, Lei
    Cai, Yingchun
    Yang, Xiaowei
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (40)
  • [7] Comparison of Lumbar Laminectomy Alone, Lumbar Laminectomy and Fusion, Stand-alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Stand-alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Review of the Literature
    Shah, Manan
    Kolb, Bradley
    Yilmaz, Emre
    Halalmeh, Dia R.
    Moisi, Marc D.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [8] Comparison of Stand-alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Open Laminectomy and Posterolateral Instrumented Fusion in the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease Following Previous Lumbar Fusion Surgery
    Louie, Philip K.
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Khan, Jannat M.
    Markowitz, Jonathan
    Movassaghi, Kamran
    Ferguson, Joseph
    Lopez, Gregory D.
    An, Howard S.
    Phillips, Frank M.
    SPINE, 2019, 44 (24) : E1461 - E1469
  • [9] Fusion rate for stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review
    Manzur, Mustfa K.
    Steinhaus, Michael E.
    Virk, Sohrab S.
    Jivanelli, Bridget
    Vaishnav, Avani S.
    McAnany, Steven J.
    Albert, Todd J.
    Iyer, Sravisht
    Gang, Catherine Himo
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 20 (11): : 1816 - 1825
  • [10] Is instrumented lateral lumbar interbody fusion superior to stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease? A meta-analysis
    Yang, Honghao
    Liu, Jingwei
    Hai, Yong
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 92 : 136 - 146