The precautionary principle and medical decision making

被引:60
作者
Resnik, DB [1 ]
机构
[1] E Carolina Univ, Brody Sch Med, Dept Med Humanities, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY | 2004年 / 29卷 / 03期
关键词
cancer screening tests; evidence-based medicine; expected utility theory; medical decision-making; precautionary principle; probability;
D O I
10.1080/03605310490500509
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The precautionary principle is a useful strategy for decision-making when physicians and patients lack evidence relating to the potential outcomes associated with various choices. According to a version of the principle defended here, one should take reasonable measures to avoid threats that are serious and plausible. The reasonableness of a response to a threat depends on several factors, including benefit vs. harm, realism, proportionality, and consistency. Since a concept of reasonableness plays an essential role in applying the precautionary principle, this principle gives physicians and patients a decision-making strategy that encourages the careful weighing and balancing of different values that one finds in humanistic approaches to clinical reasoning. Properly understood, the principle presents a worthwhile alternative to approaches to clinical reasoning that apply expected utility theory to decision problems.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 299
页数:19
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
ALBERT D, 1999, REASONING MED INTRO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, AG 21 UN PROGR ACT R
[3]  
[Anonymous], PUBLIC AFFAIRS Q
[4]  
[Anonymous], J ENV LAW PRACTICE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, CAUSALITY
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1999, BLACKS LAW DICT, V7th
[7]  
Audi R., 2001, The Architecture of Reason: The Structure and Substance of Rationality
[8]  
Beauchamp TL, 1989, The Principles of biomedical ethics, V3rd
[9]  
BOORSE C, 1975, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V5, P49
[10]  
BOYLE P, 2000, GETTING DOCTORS LIST