Comparison and evaluation of concurrent saccharification and anaerobic digestion of Napier grass after pretreatment by three microbial consortia

被引:57
|
作者
Wen, Boting [1 ,2 ]
Yuan, Xufeng [1 ]
Li, Qing X. [2 ]
Liu, Jingjing [1 ]
Ren, Jiwei [1 ]
Wang, Xiaofen [1 ]
Cui, Zongjun [1 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Agron & Biotechnol, Ctr Biomass Engn, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hawaii, Dept Mol Biosci & Bioengn, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
关键词
Microbial consortium; Pretreatment; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Anaerobic digestion; CELLULOSE-DEGRADATION; BIOLOGICAL PRETREATMENT; ENZYMATIC-HYDROLYSIS; COMMUNITY; DIVERSITY; FERMENTATION; CLOSTRIDIUM; BACTERIA; CULTURE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.043
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Napier grass is potentially a viable feedstock for biofuel production. The present study investigated biological pretreatment of Napier grass by three microbial consortia followed by saccharification and anaerobic digestion. The pretreatment efficiencies of three microbial consortia were compared in terms of degradation ability, saccharide and biogas yield. The lignocellulose loss rates of Napier grass varied largely. The biomass pretreated by the consortium WSD-5 gave 43.4% and 66.2% total sugar yield under low and moderate loadings of commercial enzyme mixtures, while the highest yield was 83.2% pretreated by the consortium MC1 under a high enzyme loading. The maximum methane yield of pretreated samples by the consortia MC1, WSD-5 and XDC-2 were 259, 279, 247 ml/g VS, respectively, which were 1.39, 1.49 and 1.32 times greater than the values of the untreated controls. This study showed that pretreatments by MC1, WSD-5 and XDC-2 were capable of significantly enhancing both the saccharide and methane yields from Napier grass. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 111
页数:10
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Comparison of Different Mechanical Pretreatment Methods for the Anaerobic Digestion of Landscape Management Grass
    Heller, Rene
    Brandhorst, Christina
    Huelsemann, Benedikt
    Lemmer, Andreas
    Oechsner, Hans
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (24)
  • [2] Performance evaluation and microbial community analysis of microaerobic pretreatment on thermophilic dry anaerobic digestion
    Zhen, Feng
    Luo, Xinjian
    Xing, Tao
    Sun, Yongming
    Kong, Xiaoying
    Li, Wenzhe
    BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2021, 167
  • [3] Effective pretreatment of lignocellulosic co-substrates using barley straw-adapted microbial consortia to enhanced biomethanation by anaerobic digestion
    Raut, Mahendra P.
    Pandhal, Jagroop
    Wright, Phillip C.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 321
  • [4] Evaluation of continuous mesophilic anaerobic sludge digestion after high temperature microwave pretreatment
    Toteci, Isil
    Kennedy, Kevin J.
    Droste, Ronald L.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2009, 43 (05) : 1273 - 1284
  • [5] Sludge disintegration and anaerobic digestion enhancement by alkaline-thermal pretreatment: Economic evaluation and microbial population analysis
    Park, Jungsu
    Cayetano, Roent Dune A.
    Kim, Gi-Beom
    Jo, Yura
    Kwon, Yeelyung
    Lei, Zhongfang
    Kim, Sang-Hyoun
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 346
  • [6] Anaerobic Two-Phase Co-Digestion for Renewable Energy Production: Estimating the Effect of Substrate Pretreatment, Hydraulic Retention Time and Participating Microbial Consortia
    Kabaivanova, Lyudmila
    Hubenov, Venelin
    Dimitrov, Neven
    Petrova, Penka
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (12):
  • [7] Enhancing anaerobic digestion of dewatered sewage sludge through thermal hydrolysis pretreatment: Performance evaluation and microbial community analysis
    Kim, Hanwoong
    Choi, Gyucheol
    Lee, Changsoo
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2024, 57
  • [8] Two-phase anaerobic digestion of municipal solid wastes enhanced by hydrothermal pretreatment: Viability, performance and microbial community evaluation
    Li, Wei
    Guo, Jianbin
    Cheng, Huicai
    Wang, Wei
    Dong, Renjie
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 189 : 613 - 622
  • [9] Comparison of energy recovery after anaerobic digestion of three Marchica lagoon algae (Caulerpa prolifera, Colpomenia sinuosa, Gracilaria bursa-pastoris)
    El Asri, Ouahid
    Ramdani, Mohamed
    Latrach, Lahbib
    Haloui, Benyounes
    Ramdani, Mohamed
    Afilal, Mohamed Elamin
    SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2017, 11 : 47 - 52
  • [10] Highly efficient anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and horticultural waste using a three-stage thermophilic bioreactor: Performance evaluation, microbial community analysis, and energy balance assessment
    Zhang, Le
    Kuroki, Agnes
    Loh, Kai-Chee
    Seok, Jiyeux Kim
    Dai, Yanjun
    Tong, Yen Wah
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 223