Response rate and content differences between web and mail surveys

被引:1
|
作者
Leone, Erin Hoerl [1 ]
Bankovich, Brittany [2 ]
Morales, Nia [3 ]
Sauby, Kristen [1 ]
Shields, Roger [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservat Commiss, Fish & Wildlife Res Inst, Ctr Biostat & Modeling, 1105 SW Williston Rd, Gainesville, FL 32653 USA
[2] Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservat Commiss, Fish & Wildlife Res Inst, Ctr Spatial Anal, 1105 SW Williston Rd, Gainesville, FL 32653 USA
[3] Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservat Commiss, Freshwater Fisheries Res, Fish & Wildlife Res Inst, 7386 NW 71st St, Gainesville, FL 32653 USA
[4] Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservat Commiss, Div Hunting & Game Management, Wild Turkey Management, 3911 Highway 2321, Panama City, FL 32409 USA
[5] Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agcy, Wildlife & Forestry Div, 5107 Edmondson Pike, Nashville, TN 37211 USA
来源
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN | 2022年 / 46卷 / 02期
关键词
hunter demographics; hunter harvest surveys; survey response rates; web surveys; NONRESPONSE RATES; BIAS; ISSUES; IMPACT; MODE;
D O I
10.1002/wsb.1292
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (Commission) conducts an annual harvest survey of licensed wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) hunters to determine the proportion of license holders that hunt and the estimated total harvest. The harvest survey is traditionally conducted with a mailed postcard, which is increasingly costly and time-consuming to administer. The Commission has considered using a less costly and less protracted web-based survey. From 2012 through 2014, we conducted web and mail surveys of licensed turkey hunters to compare response rates and reported rate of hunting participation. The average response rate differed between mail and web survey respondents (25.5% and 16.5%, respectively). Rates of hunting participation also differed between the survey modes; 40.5% and 61.4%, respectively, of mail and web survey respondents said that they hunted during the previous spring season. When hunting participation rates were extrapolated to the total number of license holders in the state, the projected average number of hunters across the 3 years was 17,356 (52%) greater from the web survey than the mail survey. Demographic weighting (age class, sex, ethnicity, median household income, or urbanicity) failed to account for the difference in reported hunting participation between survey modes. Our results indicated that respondents of the 2 survey modes differed fundamentally in either their hunting behavior or in their propensity to respond to the surveys, both of which have ramifications when management decisions are based on the results of harvest surveys. Although a mixed-mode survey may be a feasible option to reduce cost and still obtain accurate harvest estimates, we caution against abruptly switching from mail to web surveys given the vastly different outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] INCREASING RESPONSE RATE IN SURVEYS BY MAIL
    SIEBER, M
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EXPERIMENTELLE UND ANGEWANDTE PSYCHOLOGIE, 1979, 26 (02): : 334 - 340
  • [2] COMPARING RESPONSE RATES AND RESPONSE CONTENT IN MAIL VERSUS ELECTRONIC MAIL SURVEYS
    MEHTA, R
    SIVADAS, E
    JOURNAL OF THE MARKET RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1995, 37 (04): : 429 - 439
  • [3] Differences in Response Quality between Web and Social Media Surveys
    Zhu, Wenlong
    Shao, Peiji
    Fang, Jiaming
    Cao, Yunzhong
    2013 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION REFORM AND MANAGEMENT INNOVATION (ERMI 2013), PT 1, 2013, 44 : 279 - 282
  • [4] An Analysis of Response Rate and Economic Costs Between Mail and Web-Based Surveys Among Practicing Dentists: A Randomized Trial
    Patrick C. Hardigan
    Claudia Tammy Succar
    Jay M. Fleisher
    Journal of Community Health, 2012, 37 : 383 - 394
  • [5] An Analysis of Response Rate and Economic Costs Between Mail and Web-Based Surveys Among Practicing Dentists: A Randomized Trial
    Hardigan, Patrick C.
    Succar, Claudia Tammy
    Fleisher, Jay M.
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2012, 37 (02) : 383 - 394
  • [6] A comparison of response rate, response time, and costs of mail and electronic surveys
    Shannon, DM
    Bradshaw, CC
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 2002, 70 (02): : 179 - 192
  • [7] RESPONSE RATES AND RESPONSE CONTENT IN MAIL VERSUS FACE-TO-FACE SURVEYS
    KRYSAN, M
    SCHUMAN, H
    SCOTT, LJ
    BEATTY, P
    PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1994, 58 (03) : 381 - 399
  • [8] Response rates for mixed-mode surveys using mail and e-mail/Web
    Converse, Patrick D.
    Wolfe, Edward W.
    Huang, Xiaoting
    Oswald, Frederick L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2008, 29 (01) : 99 - 107
  • [9] Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet
    Dillman, Don A.
    Phelps, Glenn
    Tortora, Robert
    Swift, Karen
    Kohrell, Julie
    Berck, Jodi
    Messer, Benjamin L.
    SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2009, 38 (01) : 3 - 20
  • [10] RESPONSE PATTERNS TO MAIL SURVEYS
    COX, WE
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1966, 3 (04) : 392 - 397