The Comprehensive Snack Parenting Questionnaire (CSPQ): Development and Test-Retest Reliability

被引:16
|
作者
Gevers, Dorus W. M. [1 ]
Kremers, Stef P. J. [1 ]
de Vries, Nanne K. [1 ,2 ]
van Assema, Patricia [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, NUTRIM Sch Nutr & Translat Res Metab, Dept Hlth Promot, Med Ctr, POB 616, NL-6200 Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, CAPHRI Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Dept Hlth Promot, Med Ctr, POB 616, NL-6200 Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
food parenting practices; questionnaire; reliability; snack intake; children; CSPQ; snacking; VEGETABLE CONSUMPTION; CHILDHOOD OVERWEIGHT; CHILDREN; BEHAVIORS; ADULTHOOD; TRACKING; VALIDITY; QUALITY; OBESITY; FRUIT;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph15050862
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The narrow focus of existing food parenting instruments led us to develop a food parenting practices instrument measuring the full range of food practices constructs with a focus on snacking behavior. We present the development of the questionnaire and our research on the test-retest reliability. The developed Comprehensive Snack Parenting Questionnaire (CSPQ) covers 21 constructs. Test-retest reliability was assessed by calculating intra class correlation coefficients and percentage agreement after two administrations of the CSPQ among a sample of 66 Dutch parents. Test-retest reliability analysis revealed acceptable intra class correlation coefficients (0.41) or agreement scores (0.60) for all items. These results, together with earlier work, suggest sufficient psychometric characteristics. The comprehensive, but brief CSPQ opens up chances for highly essential but unstudied research questions to understand and predict children's snack intake. Example applications include studying the interactional nature of food parenting practices or interactions of food parenting with general parenting or child characteristics.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Test-retest reliability of the suicide opinion questionnaire
    Domino, G
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1996, 78 (03) : 1009 - 1010
  • [2] Test-retest reliability of the Cost for Patients Questionnaire
    Poder, Thomas G.
    Coulibaly, Lucien P.
    Hassan, Abakar Idriss
    Conombo, Blanchard
    Laberge, Maude
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2022, 38 (01)
  • [3] Test-retest reliability of the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire
    Jason, Leonard A.
    So, Suzanna
    Brown, Abigail A.
    Sunnquist, Madison
    Evans, Meredyth
    FATIGUE-BIOMEDICINE HEALTH AND BEHAVIOR, 2015, 3 (01): : 16 - 32
  • [4] TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF THE FRANKFURT COMPLAINT QUESTIONNAIRE
    Loas, Gwenole
    Yon, Valerie
    Monestes, Jean Louis
    Cuesta, Manuel J.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2011, 108 (02) : 503 - 506
  • [5] Test-retest reliability of the Organizational Commitment Questionnaire
    Lam, SSK
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 138 (06): : 787 - 788
  • [6] Test-retest reliability of the revised diplopia questionnaire
    Mansukhani, Sasha A.
    Hatt, Sarah R.
    Leske, David A.
    Holmes, Jonathan M.
    JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2019, 23 (06): : 319 - 320
  • [7] THE TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF THE COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM FOR THE RORSCHACH TEST
    DERUITER, C
    COHEN, L
    VANDERGRIJP, DN
    BINKHUYSEN, PJF
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 27 (3-4) : 345 - 350
  • [8] Test-Retest Reliability of the ABILOCO Questionnaire in Individuals with Stroke
    de Menezes, Kenia K. P.
    Avelino, Patrick R.
    Faria-Fortini, Iza
    Basilio, Marluce L.
    Nascimento, Lucas R.
    Teixeira-Salmela, Luci F.
    PM&R, 2019, 11 (08) : 843 - 848
  • [9] Preliminary test-retest reliability of the Wheelchair Satisfaction Questionnaire
    Bane, Heather M.
    Sheafer, Vicki
    Rispin, Karen
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 17 (05) : 555 - 558
  • [10] Test-Retest Reliability of the Susceptibility to Driver Distraction Questionnaire
    Marulanda, Susana
    Chen, Huei-Yen Winnie
    Donmez, Birsen
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2015, (2518) : 54 - 59