The EU greenhouse gas inventory for the LULUCF sector: I. Overview and comparative analysis of methods used by EU member states

被引:14
|
作者
Blujdea, Viorel N. B. [1 ,2 ]
Vinas, Raul Abad [1 ]
Federici, Sandro [1 ]
Grassi, Giacomo [1 ]
机构
[1] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Forest Resources & Climate Unit, Via Fermi 2749 TP 261, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
[2] Natl Inst Res & Dev Forestry Marin Dracea, Bd Eroilor 128, Voluntari 077190, Ilfov, Romania
关键词
LULUCF; land; GHG inventory; carbon pools; heterogeneity; methods; definitions; European Union; NATIONAL FOREST INVENTORIES; GROWING STOCK; CARBON; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1080/17583004.2016.1151504
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Reporting national greenhouses gas inventories for the Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) under the United Nations Framework Convention for Climate Change (UNFCCC) has been driving significant development of national data. Lands classification and definitions for C pools are very different across the 28 EU member states, as are the methods used for data collection and processing. Even when definitions or sampling methods were in substance the same, specifications were-different. However, member states' inventories are assumed to be fully comparable and consistent with reporting principles. For forest, data collection rely on forest inventory repeated measurements (both statistical sampling and stand-wise), while for most important contributor, the biomass, there is no preference for "gain-loss" or "stock-change" method. For cropland and grasslands, operational records information is equally important to statistical sampling and aerial photography sources for area estimation, while default emission factors are used less and less as they are being replaced by country-specific data. The obvious trend is the move toward statistical sampling covering all land categories within national territory and slight increasing use of models. Such heterogeneity requires a better harmonization of data collection and processing as to increase the credibility of the EU GHG inventory.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 259
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EU and Member States greenhouse gas emission trends and projections
    Ritter, M
    Strobel, B
    Bates, J
    Gardiner, A
    Cames, M
    van Minnen, J
    Jol, A
    NON-C02 GREENHOUSE GASES: SCIENTIFIC UNDERSTANDING, CONTROL OPTIONS AND POLICY ASPECTS, 2002, : 269 - 274
  • [2] THE LEVEL OF RENEWABLE ENERGY USED IN EU MEMBER STATES A MULTIDIMENSIONAL COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
    Grzebyk, Mariola
    Stec, Malgorzata
    ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 86 (03): : 244 - 264
  • [3] ASSESSING ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS IN EU MEMBER STATES - DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS
    Chovancova, Jana
    Stofejova, Lenka
    Gavura, Stefan
    Novotny, Roman
    Rigelsky, Martin
    ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES, 2024, 11 (04): : 242 - 259
  • [4] Assessment of the Impact of Digitalization on Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the Example of EU Member States
    Kuzior, Aleksandra
    Vyshnevskyi, Oleksandr
    Trushkina, Nataliia
    PRODUCTION ENGINEERING ARCHIVES, 2022, 28 (04) : 407 - 419
  • [5] Greenhouse gas emission accounting for EU member states from 1991 to 2012
    Su, Meirong
    Pauleit, Stephan
    Yin, Xuemei
    Zheng, Ying
    Chen, Shaoqing
    Xu, Chao
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 184 : 759 - 768
  • [6] The Right to Strike in EU Member States: A Comparative Overview with Particular Reference to Lithuania
    Petrylaite, Daiva
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LABOUR LAW AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 2010, 26 (04): : 421 - 434
  • [7] Nominal Convergence in the New EU Member States: Comparative Analysis
    Brandova, Blanka
    LIBEREC ECONOMIC FORUM 2019, 2019, : 172 - 179
  • [8] Welfare and Higher Education in EU Member States - Comparative Analysis
    Wronowska, Gabriela
    OECONOMIA COPERNICANA, 2015, 6 (01) : 33 - 45
  • [9] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FDI INCENTIVES IN NEW EU MEMBER STATES
    Miskinis, Algirdas
    Mikneviciute, Martina
    TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS, 2011, 10 (03): : 72 - 86
  • [10] Comparative Analysis of EU Member Countries Vulnerability in Oil and Gas
    Roupas, C.
    Flamos, A.
    Psarras, J.
    ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2011, 6 (04) : 348 - 356