The Cardiff paediatric laryngoscope blade: a comparison with the Miller size 1 and Macintosh size 2 laryngoscope blades

被引:13
|
作者
Jones, RM [1 ]
Jones, PL [1 ]
Gildersleve, CD [1 ]
Hall, JE [1 ]
Harding, LJE [1 ]
Chawathe, MS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wales Hosp, Cardiff CF14 4XW, S Glam, Wales
关键词
anaesthesia; paediatric; equipment; laryngoscopes; intubation; tracheal;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03839.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
The Cardiff paediatric laryngoscope blade is a single blade that has been designed for use in children from birth to adolescence. This open, randomised, crossover study compared the Cardiff blade with the straight, size 1, Miller laryngoscope blade in 39 infants under 1 years of age and the curved, size 2, Macintosh blade in 39 children aged 1-16 years. The same laryngoscopic view was obtained with the Cardiff and Miller blades in 26 patients; the view was better with the Cardiff blade in seven patients and better with the Miller blade in six (median (IQR [range]) grade of laryngoscopy 1 (1-2 [1-3]) vs. 1 (1-2 [1-3]), respectively; p = 0.405). The Cardiff blade was faster at gaining a view than the Miller blade (mean (SD) time 8.5 (2.9) s vs. 10.2 (3.5) s, respectively; 95% CI for difference -2.8 to -0.4; p = 0.009). The Cardiff and Macintosh blades produced the same view in 32 patients; the view was better with the Cardiff blade in seven patients (median (IQR [range]) grade of laryngoscopy 1 (1-1 [1-3]) vs. 1 (1-2 [1-3]), respectively; p = 0.008). There was no difference in time to gain these views: mean (SD) 8.7 (3.0) s vs. 9.3 (2.7) s, respectively (95% CI for difference -1.58 to 0.40; p = 0.237). The Cardiff paediatric laryngoscope blade compares favourably with these two established laryngoscope blades in children.
引用
收藏
页码:1016 / 1019
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison between Macintosh, Miller and McCoy laryngoscope blade size 2 in paediatric patients - A randomised controlled trial
    Yadav, Pratishtha
    Kundu, Sudeshna Bhar
    Bhattacharjee, Dhurjoti P.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 63 (01) : 15 - 20
  • [2] A new universal laryngoscope blade:: a preliminary comparison with Macintosh laryngoscope blades
    Gerlach, K
    Wenzel, V
    von Knobelsdorff, G
    Steinfath, M
    Dörges, V
    RESUSCITATION, 2003, 57 (01) : 63 - 67
  • [3] Comparison of the Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscope blades
    Pritchard, C
    ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 52 (02) : 185 - 186
  • [4] Comparison of two Macintosh laryngoscope blades
    Asai, T
    Matsumoto, S
    Shingu, K
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 89 (04) : 670P - 670P
  • [5] Comparison of the Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscope blades
    Groom, P
    Hawkins, M
    ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 52 (08) : 802 - 802
  • [6] Truview™ laryngoscope - A comparison with the macintosh blade
    Harvey, K. E.
    Davies, R. G.
    Hall, J. E.
    Mecklenburgh, J. S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 21 : 71 - 71
  • [7] Comparison of the Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscope blades - Reply
    Bosworth, A
    Jago, RH
    ANAESTHESIA, 1997, 52 (03) : 280 - 282
  • [8] A comparison between the Macintosh and the McCoy laryngoscope blades
    Cook, TM
    Tuckey, JP
    ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 51 (10) : 977 - 980
  • [9] Comparison of the laryngoscopy views with the size 1 Miller and Macintosh laryngoscope blades lifting the epiglottis or the base of the tongue in infants and children <2 yr of age
    Passi, Y.
    Sathyamoorthy, M.
    Lerman, J.
    Heard, C.
    Marino, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 113 (05) : 869 - 874
  • [10] A comparison of the TruView EVO2 and macintosh laryngoscope blades
    Tutuncu, Ayse Cigdem
    Kaya, Guner
    Tunali, Yusuf
    Altintas, Fatis
    Dilmen, Ozlem Korkmaz
    CLINICS, 2011, 66 (04) : 709 - 711