共 9 条
- [1] TAXPAYERS IDENTITY NOT PRIVILEGED, SAYS DISTRICT COURTJOURNAL OF TAXATION, 1976, 45 (01): : 51 - 52不详
- [2] THE TAXPAYER'S FIRST TAX COURT VICTORY IN SECTION 722TAXES-THE TAX MAGAZINE, 1946, 24 (10): : 936 - 939Landman, J. H.
- [3] Scientist's court appeal may extend state whistleblower law overseasSCIENTIST, 1996, 10 (01): : 1 - &Sternberg, S
- [4] Widow's suit over experimental drug remanded to state court - Federal food, drug and cosmetic act provides no private cause of action, US district judge saysBIOTECHNOLOGY LAW REPORT, 1996, 15 (03): : 387 - 388不详
- [7] STATE OF TEXAS, Plaintiff, v. YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO, et al., Defendants EP-99-CV-320-KC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, EL PASO DIVISION 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70159 May 27, 2016, Decided May 27, 2016, FiledGAMING LAW REVIEW & ECONOMICS-REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2016, 20 (08): : 691 - 710不详
- [8] UCC Commentary - Although collecting banks may be liable in damages for breaching section 4-207's transfer and presentment warranties, recent court decisions typically find that they do not have to pay the attorney's fees of other collecting or payor banks that bring successful suits or claims against themBANKING LAW JOURNAL, 1999, 116 (06): : 557 - 564Krinick, EH
- [9] THE CHEROKEE NATION, THE CHICKASAW NATION, AND THE CHOCTAW NATION, Plaintiffs, THE CITIZEN POTAWATOMI NATION, THE MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION, THE QUAPAW NATION, THE DELAWARE NATION, THE SEMINOLE NATION, THE WICHITA AND AFFILIATED TRIBES, Plaintiffs-in-Intervention, v. J. KEVIN STITT, in his official capacity as the Governor of the State of Oklahoma, Defendant/Counterclaimant. No. CIV-19-1198-D United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma Plaintiffs' and Plaintiffs-in-Intervention's Opening Brief in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Filed May 22, 2020GAMING LAW REVIEW-ECONOMICS REGULATION COMPLIANCE AND POLICY, 2020, 24 (08): : 575 - 590不详