The evaluation of key comparison data: An introduction

被引:23
|
作者
Cox, MG [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Phys Lab, Teddington TW11 0LW, Middx, England
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0026-1394/39/6/9
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
Guidelines containing two procedures are proposed for the evaluation of key comparison data. They apply to the simple circulation of a single travelling standard around all the participants. The application of the procedures to a specific set of key comparison data provides a key comparison reference value (KCRV) and the associated uncertainty, the degree of equivalence of the measurement made by each participating national institute and the degrees of equivalence between measurements made by all pairs of participating institutes. Procedure A is based on the use of the weighted mean, together with consistency checks based on classical statistics regarding its applicability. Should the checks fail, action to remedy the situation is suggested. If the remedy is inappropriate, Procedure B can be applied instead. It is based on the use of the median (another informed choice) as a more robust estimator in the circumstances.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 588
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The evaluation of key comparison data using key comparison reference curves
    Cox, M. G.
    Harris, P. M.
    METROLOGIA, 2012, 49 (04) : 437 - 445
  • [2] Technical Aspects of Guidelines for the Evaluation of Key Comparison Data
    M. G. Cox
    P. M. Harris
    Measurement Techniques, 2004, 47 : 102 - 111
  • [3] Technical aspects of guidelines for the evaluation of key comparison data
    Cox, MG
    Harris, PM
    MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2004, 47 (01) : 102 - 111
  • [4] Evaluation of regional key comparison data: two approaches for data processing
    Kharitonov, I. A.
    Chunovkina, A. G.
    METROLOGIA, 2006, 43 (05) : 470 - 476
  • [5] Uncertainty Evaluation for Big Data of Mass Standards in a Key Comparison
    Ren, Xiaoping
    Nan, Fang
    Wang, Jian
    SECURITY, PRIVACY, AND ANONYMITY IN COMPUTATION, COMMUNICATION, AND STORAGE (SPACCS 2018), 2018, 11342 : 465 - 471
  • [6] The evaluation of key comparison data: determining the largest consistent subset
    Cox, Maurice G.
    METROLOGIA, 2007, 44 (03) : 187 - 200
  • [7] Introduction and summary of key clinical data
    Fraser, Ian S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2008, 13 : 1 - 3
  • [8] Uncertainty evaluation for linking a bilateral key comparison with the corresponding CIPM key comparison
    Ojanen, M.
    Shpak, M.
    Karha, P.
    Leecharoen, R.
    Ikonen, E.
    METROLOGIA, 2009, 46 (05) : 397 - 403
  • [9] Consistency tests for key comparison data
    Iyer, HK
    Wang, CM
    Vecchia, DF
    METROLOGIA, 2004, 41 (04) : 223 - 230
  • [10] Analysis of key comparison data and laboratory biases
    Chunovkina, A. G.
    Elster, C.
    Lira, I.
    Woeger, W.
    METROLOGIA, 2008, 45 (02) : 211 - 216