Enchanted Determinism: Power without Responsibility in Artificial Intelligence

被引:113
|
作者
Campolo, Alexander [1 ]
Crawford, Kate [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Stevanovich Inst Format Knowledge, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] NYU, New York, NY 10003 USA
[3] Microsoft Res, Redmond, WA USA
关键词
artificial intelligence; deep learning; enchantment; Max Weber; magic; classification; CHARISMA;
D O I
10.17351/ests2020.277
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Deep learning techniques are growing in popularity within the field of artificial intelligence (AI). These approaches identify patterns in large scale datasets, and make classifications and predictions, which have been celebrated as more accurate than those of humans. But for a number of reasons, including nonlinear path from inputs to outputs, there is a dearth of theory that can explain why deep learning techniques work so well at pattern detection and prediction. Claims about "superhuman" accuracy and insight, paired with the inability to fully explain how these results are produced, form a discourse about AI that we call enchanted determinism. To analyze enchanted determinism, we situate it within a broader epistemological diagnosis of modernity: Max Weber's theory of disenchantment. Deep learning occupies an ambiguous position in this framework. On one hand, it represents a complex form of technological calculation and prediction, phenomena Weber associated with disenchantment. On the other hand, both deep learning experts and observers deploy enchanted, magical discourses to describe these systems' uninterpretable mechanisms and counter-intuitive behavior. The combination of predictive accuracy and mysterious or unexplainable properties results in myth-making about deep learning's transcendent, superhuman capacities, especially when it is applied in social settings. We analyze how discourses of magical deep learning produce techno-optimism, drawing on case studies from game-playing, adversarial examples, and attempts to infer sexual orientation from facial images. Enchantment shields the creators of these systems from accountability while its deterministic, calculative power intensifies social processes of classification and control.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 19
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Artificial intelligence and responsibility
    Lauwaert, Lode
    AI & SOCIETY, 2021, 36 (03) : 1001 - 1009
  • [2] Artificial intelligence and responsibility
    Lode Lauwaert
    AI & SOCIETY, 2021, 36 : 1001 - 1009
  • [3] Artificial intelligence and the ethic of responsibility
    Terrones Rodriguez, Antonio Luis
    CUESTIONES DE FILOSOFIA, 2018, 4 (22): : 141 - 170
  • [5] DETERMINISM AND RESPONSIBILITY
    WEINBERGER, O
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHISCHE FORSCHUNG, 1980, 34 (04): : 607 - 620
  • [6] Determinism and responsibility
    Russell, H. N.
    SCIENCE, 1943, 97 (2516) : 249 - 253
  • [7] Artificial intelligence, ethics, and intergenerational responsibility
    Klockmann, Victor
    von Schenk, Alicia
    Villeval, Marie Claire
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2022, 203 : 284 - 317
  • [8] Artificial Intelligence and Morality: A Social Responsibility
    Kanade, Anuradha
    Karad, Vishwanath
    Bhoite, Sachin
    Kanade, Shantanu
    Jain, Niraj
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENCE STUDIES IN BUSINESS, 2023, 13 (01): : 65 - 75
  • [9] Ethical and legal responsibility for Artificial Intelligence
    Henz P.
    Discover Artificial Intelligence, 2021, 1 (01):
  • [10] Reply to “Collective Responsibility and Artificial Intelligence”
    Nathan Gabriel Wood
    Philosophy & Technology, 2024, 37 (2)