Platform governance for sustainable development: Reshaping citizenadministration relationships in the digital age

被引:81
|
作者
Janowski, Tomasz [1 ,2 ]
Estevez, Elsa [3 ,4 ]
Baguma, Rehema [5 ]
机构
[1] Gdansk Univ Technol, Fac Management & Econ, Dept Appl Informat Management, Gdansk, Poland
[2] Danube Univ Krems, Fac Business & Globalizat, Dept E Governance Econ & Adm, Krems An Der Donau, Austria
[3] Univ Nacl Sur, Dept Ciencias & Ingn Comp, Argentina UNS, Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[4] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, Inst Ciencias & Ingn Comp UNS, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[5] Makarere Univ, Sch Comp & Informat Technol, Kampala, Uganda
关键词
Public governance; Platform governance; Digital government; Sustainable development; Citizen-administration relationships; PUBLIC-ATTITUDES; GOVERNMENT; PARTICIPATION; INSTITUTIONS; SERVICES; INSIGHTS; SMART; TRANSPARENCY; LEGITIMACY; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.002
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Changing governance paradigms has been shaping and reshaping the landscape of citizen-administration relationships, from impartial application of rules and regulations by administration to exercise its authority over citizens (bureaucratic paradigm), through provision of public services by administration to fulfil the needs of citizens (consumerist paradigm), to responsibility-sharing between administration and citizens for policy and service processes (participatory paradigm). The recent trend is the administration empowering citizens to create public value by themselves, through socio-technical systems that bring data, services, technologies and people together to respond to changing societal needs. Such systems are called "platforms" and the trend is called "platform paradigm". The aim of this article is to offer a conceptual framework for citizen-administration relationships under the platform paradigm. While existing models of citizen-administration relationships mainly focus on specific types of relationships, e.g. citizen trust versus administrative transparency, or citizen satisfaction versus administrative performance, the proposed framework identifies a comprehensive set of relationships that explain how decisions by citizens or administration and the policy environment mutually agreed by them contribute to shaping such relationships and building individual and collective capacity for pursuing sustainable development. The framework comprises 15 types of relationships organized along the four governance paradigms. It is illustrated through the analysis of 11 case studies published in the current issue. Based on this analysis, the article also formulates some insights that are relevant to researchers and policymakers who intend to utilize platform governance for sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页码:S1 / S16
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Holistic Governance for Sustainable Public Services: Reshaping Government-Enterprise Relationships in China's Digital Government Context
    Li, Xuesong
    Ding, Yunlong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (05)
  • [2] Sustainable Development in the Digital Age of Entrepreneurship
    Stawicka, Ewa
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (08)
  • [3] Digital governance, hotspot geoinformatics, and sustainable development: A Preface
    G. P. Patil
    Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 2010, 17 : 133 - 147
  • [4] Enhancing governance efficiency and digital remittances for sustainable development
    Saud, Shah
    Khan, Irfan
    Zaidi, Syed Anees Haider
    Haseeb, Abdul
    Li, Huiyun
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [5] Digital governance, hotspot geoinformatics, and sustainable development: A Preface
    Patil, G. P.
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL STATISTICS, 2010, 17 (02) : 133 - 147
  • [6] The Coupling and Coordination Degree of Digital Business and Digital Governance in the Context of Sustainable Development
    Kwilinski, Aleksy
    Lyulyov, Oleksii
    Pimonenko, Tetyana
    INFORMATION, 2023, 14 (12)
  • [7] On relationships between integrated policies for sustainable urban development and urban governance
    Jacquier, C
    TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR ECONOMISCHE EN SOCIALE GEOGRAFIE, 2005, 96 (04) : 363 - 376
  • [8] The contributions of resilience to reshaping sustainable development
    Reyers, Belinda
    Moore, Michele-Lee
    Haider, L. Jamila
    Schluter, Maja
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 5 (08) : 657 - 664
  • [9] The contributions of resilience to reshaping sustainable development
    Belinda Reyers
    Michele-Lee Moore
    L. Jamila Haider
    Maja Schlüter
    Nature Sustainability, 2022, 5 : 657 - 664
  • [10] Does information technology governance strengthen or weaken contract control in digital platform relationships?
    Yang, Qian
    Qian, Liping
    Zhao, Xiande
    INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2022, 122 (01) : 20 - 36