Multi-actor multi-criteria sustainability assessment framework for energy and industrial systems in life cycle perspective under uncertainties. Part 1: weighting method

被引:12
|
作者
Ren, Jingzheng [1 ]
Ren, Xusheng [2 ]
Liang, Hanwei [3 ]
Dong, Liang [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Zhang, Long [6 ]
Luo, Xiao [7 ,8 ]
Yang, Yingkui [9 ]
Gao, Zhiqiu [10 ]
机构
[1] Hongkong Polytech Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Sch Chem & Chem Engn, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Forecast & Evaluat Meteoro, Sch Geog & Remote Sensing, Nanjing 210044, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Leiden Univ, CML, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] NIES, Ctr Social & Environm Syst Res, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058506, Japan
[6] China Univ Geosci, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[7] Tongji Univ, Coll Architecture & Urban Planning, 1239 Siping Rd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[8] Shanghai Tongji Urban Planning & Design Inst, 1111 North Zhongshan Rd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[9] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Environm & Business Econ, DK-96700 Esbjerg, Denmark
[10] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Atmospher Phys, State Key Lab Atmospher Boundary Layer Phys & Atm, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Analytical hierarchy process; Interval number; Life cycle assessment; Multi-actor multi-criteria decision-making; Weights; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; FUZZY-AHP; CHINA; SECURITY; MODEL; LCA;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-016-1251-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Life cycle sustainability assessment is meaningful for the decision-makers/stakeholders to select the most sustainable option among multiple alternatives; however, there are usually various severe uncertainty problems in sustainability-oriented decision-making, i.e., the vagueness and ambiguity that existed in human judgments and the lack of information. This study aims at developing a novel life cycle multi-criteria sustainability assessment method for helping the decision-makers/stakeholders to determine the sustainability level of the industrial and energy systems. In part 1, an improved interval analytic hierarchy process (AHP) which allows multiple decision-makers/stakeholders to participate in the decision-making was developed to determine the weights of the criteria which were used in life cycle sustainability assessment. It is usually difficult for the decision-makers/stakeholders to use the numbers from 1 to 9 and their reciprocals for determining the comparison matrix when using the traditional AHP method for weight calculation, because human judgments usually involve various uncertainties. In order to the overcome this weak point of the traditional AHP, an improved AHP, so-called interval AHP, in which, multiple decision-makers/stakeholders are allowed to participate in the decision-making and allowed to use interval numbers instead of crisp numbers to establish the comparison matrix for determining the weights of the criteria for life cycle sustainability assessment, has been developed. The proposed method was used to determine the weights of the four aspects for life cycle sustainability assessment including economic, safety, social, and environmental aspects. Five representative stakeholders were invited to participate in the decision-making. After Monte Carlo simulation, the final weights of the four aspects have been determined with the proposed interval AHP. An interval AHP method was developed for determining the weights of the criteria for life cycle sustainability assessment; the decision-makers are allowed to use interval numbers to establish the comparison matrix for weight calculation. The weighting coefficients determined by Monte Carlo method can accurately reflect the preferences and willingness of multi-actor comparing with the traditional AHP method. This paper merely presents a novel method to calculate the weights of the criteria for life cycle sustainability assessment, but the method for determining the sustainability performance has been presented in part 2.
引用
收藏
页码:1397 / 1405
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-actor multi-criteria sustainability assessment framework for energy and industrial systems in life cycle perspective under uncertainties. Part 1: weighting method
    Jingzheng Ren
    Xusheng Ren
    Hanwei Liang
    Liang Dong
    Long Zhang
    Xiao Luo
    Yingkui Yang
    Zhiqiu Gao
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 1397 - 1405
  • [2] Multi-actor multi-criteria sustainability assessment framework for energy and industrial systems in life cycle perspective under uncertainties. Part 2: improved extension theory
    Ren, Jingzheng
    Ren, Xusheng
    Liang, Hanwei
    Dong, Liang
    Zhang, Long
    Luo, Xiao
    Yang, Yingkui
    Gao, Zhiqiu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (09): : 1406 - 1417
  • [3] Multi-actor multi-criteria sustainability assessment framework for energy and industrial systems in life cycle perspective under uncertainties. Part 2: improved extension theory
    Jingzheng Ren
    Xusheng Ren
    Hanwei Liang
    Liang Dong
    Long Zhang
    Xiao Luo
    Yingkui Yang
    Zhiqiu Gao
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 1406 - 1417
  • [4] Multi-criteria decision making for the prioritization of energy systems under uncertainties after life cycle sustainability assessment
    Ren, Jingzheng
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2018, 16 : 45 - 57
  • [5] A multi-criteria sustainability assessment for biodiesel alternatives in Spain: Life cycle assessment normalization and weighting
    Fernandez-Tirado, Francisca
    Parra-Lopez, Carlos
    Romero-Gamez, Mercedes
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2021, 164 (164) : 1195 - 1203
  • [6] Range-based Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis: A combined method of Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis and Monte Carlo simulation to support participatory decision making under uncertainty
    Baudry, Gino
    Macharis, Cathy
    Vallee, Thomas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 264 (01) : 257 - 269
  • [7] Multi-Criteria Life Cycle Approach to Develop Weighting of Sustainability Indicators for Pavement
    Yang, Shih-Hsien
    Liu, Jack Yen Hung
    Nam Hoai Tran
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (07)
  • [8] Proposal of a multi-expert multi-criteria model for the sustainability assessment of industrial systems under uncertainty
    Xu, Di
    Yuan, Jinhai
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2025, 27 (01) : 269 - 292
  • [9] Fuzzy Multi-actor Multi-criteria Decision Making for sustainability assessment of biomass-based technologies for hydrogen production
    Ren, Jingzheng
    Fedele, Andrea
    Mason, Marco
    Manzardo, Alessandro
    Scipioni, Antonio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2013, 38 (22) : 9111 - 9120
  • [10] A hybrid multi-criteria dynamic sustainability assessment framework for integrated multi-energy systems incorporating hydrogen at ports
    Tang, Daogui
    Zheng, Zihuan
    Guerrero, Josep M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2025, 99 : 540 - 552